3,176
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Self-assessment first or peer-assessment first: effects of video-based formative practice on learners’ English public speaking anxiety and performance

, &

References

  • Adachi, C., Tai, J. H. M., & Dawson, P. (2018). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 294–306. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
  • Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2017). Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 252–265. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
  • Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2018). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1106–1119. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128
  • Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. doi:10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2020). Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–32. doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2018.1441807
  • Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: Defining, explaining, and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59(1), 70–105. doi:10.1080/03634520903443849
  • Bolívar-Cruz, A., & Verano-Tacoronte, D. (2018). Self-assessment of the oral presentation competence: Effects of gender and student’s performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 94–101. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.04.001
  • Boud, D., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Bennett, S., Joughin, G., & Molloy, E. (2018). Reframing assessment research: Through a practice perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1107–1118. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1202913
  • Bourhis, J., & Allen, M. (1998). The role of videotaped feedback in the instruction of public speaking: A quantitative synthesis of published empirical research. Communication Research Reports, 15(3), 256–261. doi:10.1080/08824099809362121
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Brown, T., & Morrissey, L. (2004). The effectiveness of verbal self-guidance as a transfer of training intervention: Its impact on presentation performance, self-efficacy and anxiety. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 255–271. doi:10.1080/14703290410001733302
  • Buyukkarci, K. (2014). Formative microteaching in teaching and foreign language anxiety. The Anthropologist, 18(2), 505–511. doi:10.1080/09720073.2014.11891568
  • Cardenas-Claros, M. S., & Gruba, P. A. (2014). Listeners’ interactions with help options in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 228–245. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.724425
  • Carless, D. (2013). Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In D. Boud & L. Molly (Eds.), Feedback in higher and professional education (pp. 90–103). London: Routledge.
  • Chien, S.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146, 103751. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
  • Chow, B. W.-Y., Chiu, H. T., & Wong, S. W. L. (2018). Anxiety in reading and listening English as a foreign language in Chinese undergraduate students. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 719–738. doi:10.1177/1362168817702159
  • Coskun, A. (2017). The effect of pecha kucha presentations on students’ English public speaking anxiety. [Los efectos de presentaciones “Pecha Kucha” sobre la ansiedad a hablar en público de estudiantes de inglés]. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19, 11–22. doi:10.15446/profile.v19n_sup1.68495
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th eds.). Croydon: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advances in mixed methods design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 209–240).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2009). The impact of an innovative instructional intervention on the acquisition of oral presentation skills in higher education. Computers & Education, 53(1), 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.005
  • De Grez, L., Valcke, M., & Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments?Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(2), 129–142. doi:10.1177/1469787412441284
  • Dewaele, J.-M. (2002). Psychological and sociodemographic correlates of communicative anxiety in L2 and L3 production. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(1), 23–38. doi:10.1177/13670069020060010201
  • Dewaele, J.-M. (2017). Are perfectionists more anxious foreign language learners and users? In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 70–91). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dewaele, J.-M., & Al-Saraj, T. M. (2013). Foreign language anxiety: Some conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Psychology, 68(3), 71–78.
  • Dewaele, J. M., & Furnham, A. (1999). Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49(3), 509–544. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00098
  • Dupagne, M., Stacks, D., & Giroux, V. (2007). Effects of video streaming technology on public speaking students’ communication apprehension and competence. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(4), 479–490. doi:10.2190/5947-4W72-303L-Q578
  • Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5–6), 617–651. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
  • Ebrahimi, O. V., Pallesen, S., Kenter, R. M. F., & Nordgreen, T. (2019). Psychological interventions for the fear of public speaking: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 488. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00488
  • Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 206–220. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00275.x
  • Elmenfi, F., & Gaibani, A. (2016). The role of social evaluation in influencing public speaking anxiety of English language learners at Omar Al-Mukhtar University. Arab World English Journal, 7(3), 496–505. doi:10.24093/awej/vol7no3.35
  • Fukkink, R. G., Trienekens, N., & Kramer, L. J. C. (2011). Video feedback in education and training: Putting learning in the picture. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 45–63. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9144-5
  • Ge, Z. G. (2019). Exploring the effect of video feedback from unknown peers on e-learners’ English-Chinese translation performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–21. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1677721
  • González de Sande, J. C., & Godino-Llorente, J. I. (2014). Peer assessment and self-assessment: Effective learning tools in higher education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(3), 711–721.
  • Gotwals, A. W., Philhower, J., Cisterna, D., & Bennett, S. (2015). Using video to examine formative assessment practices as measures of expertise for mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 405–423. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9623-8
  • Han, C. (2018). A longitudinal quantitative investigation into the concurrent validity of self and peer assessment applied to English-Chinese bi-directional interpretation in an undergraduate interpreting course. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 187–196. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.01.001
  • Hartmeyer, R., Stevenson, M. P., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Evaluating design-based formative assessment practices in outdoor science teaching. Educational Research, 58(4), 420–441. doi:10.1080/00131881.2016.1237857
  • He, D. (2013). What makes learners anxious while speaking English: A comparative study of the perceptions held by university students and teachers in China. Educational Studies, 39(3), 338–350. doi:10.1080/03055698.2013.764819
  • Hinton, J. S., & Kramer, M. W. (1998). The impact of self-directed videotape feedback on students’ self-reported levels of communication competence and apprehension. Communication Education, 47(2), 151–161. doi:10.1080/03634529809379119
  • Horwitz, E. K. (2013). Becoming a language teacher: A practical guide to second language learning and teaching (2nd eds.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (2017). On the misreading of Horwitz, Horwitz and Cope (1986) and the need to balance anxiety research and the experiences of anxious language learners. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 31–47).Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
  • Huang, S.-C. (2016). Understanding learners’ self-assessment and self-feedback on their foreign language speaking performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 803–820. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1042426
  • Huck, S. W., & McLean, R. A. (1975). Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design: A potentially confusing task. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 511–518. doi:10.1037/h0076767
  • Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
  • Hung, Y.-J. (2019). Bridging assessment and achievement: Repeated practice of self-assessment in college English classes in Taiwan. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1191–1208. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1584783
  • Irons, A. (2007). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. London: Routledge.
  • Jin, Y. X., & Dewaele, J. M. (2018). The effect of positive orientation and perceived social support on foreign language classroom anxiety. System, 74, 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.01.002
  • Jing, W., & Li, W. (2009). A study of the relationship between English public speaking curriculum and the integrated ability of foreign language talents. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (9), 32–35.
  • Kasbi, S., & Elahi Shirvan, M. (2017). Ecological understanding of foreign language speaking anxiety: Emerging patterns and dynamic systems. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 1–20. doi:10.1186/s40862-017-0026-y
  • Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning and Technology, 16(1), 91–109.
  • Kim, E. J., & Lee, K. R. (2019). Effects of an examiner’s positive and negative feedback on self-assessment of skill performance, emotional response, and self-efficacy in Korea: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 142. doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1595-x
  • Koh, E., Hong, H., & Tan, J. P.-L. (2018). Formatively assessing teamwork in technology-enabled twenty-first century classrooms: Exploratory findings of a teamwork awareness programme in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(1), 129–144. doi:10.1080/02188791.2018.1423952
  • Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344–348. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
  • Kralova, Z., & Tirpakova, A. (2019). Nonnative EFL teachers’ speaking anxiety: Post-communist country context. Sage Open, 9(2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244019846698
  • Lam, R. (2016). Assessment as learning: Examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio-based classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1900–1917. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.999317
  • Langan, A. M., Shuker, D. M., Cullen, W. R., Penney, D., Preziosi, R. F., & Wheater, C. P. (2008). Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 179–190. doi:10.1080/02602930701292498
  • Leenknecht, M., Wijnia, L., Kohlen, M., Fryer, L., Rikers, R., & Loyens, S. (2021). Formative assessment as practice: The role of students’ motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 236–255. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228
  • Lee, G. C., & Wu, C.-C. (2006). Enhancing the teaching experience of pre-service teachers through the use of videos in web-based computer-mediated communication. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(4), 369–380. doi:10.1080/14703290600973836
  • Lee, H., & Kleinsmith, A. (2019). Public speaking anxiety in a real classroom: Towards developing a reflection system. Chi Ea ‘19 Extended Abstracts: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 Chi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. doi:10.1145/3290607.3312875
  • LeFebvre, L., LeFebvre, L. E., & Allen, M. (2018). Training the butterflies to fly in formation: Cataloguing student fears about public speaking. Communication Education, 67(3), 348–362. doi:10.1080/03634523.2018.1468915
  • Li, M., & Zhang, X. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-assessment and language performance in language testing and assessment. Language Testing, 38(2), 189–130. doi:10.1177/0265532220932481
  • Liang, H. Y., & Kelsen, B. (2018). Influence of personality and motivation on oral presentation performance. J Psycholinguist Res, 47(4), 755–776. doi:10.1007/s10936-017-9551-6
  • Liu, M. (2018). Bilingual/multilingual learners’ willingness to communicate in and anxiety on speaking Chinese and their associations with self-rated proficiency in Chinese. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 54–69. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1127889
  • Liu, R. Q., & Dai, M. C. (2003). FLT reform in Chinese higher education: Current situation and future development strategy. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00687.x
  • Logan, E. (2009). Self and peer assessment in action. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3(1), 29–35.
  • Lucas, S. E. (2009). The role of public speaking in China’s English language curriculum. In L. Wang (Eds.), English public speaking in global context: Challenges and innovations (pp. 3–24). Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • Lucas, S. E. (2010). The art of public speaking (10th ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • Lucas, S. E. (2013). English public speaking and the cultivation of talents for Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 163–182. doi:10.1515/cjal-2013-0011
  • Lucas, S. E., & Yin, S. (2011). The art of public speaking (teacher’s book) (10th ed.). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • Lu, Z., Zheng, C., & Li, Z. (2018). Effects of embedded summary writing on EFL learners’ anxiety and oral production in a computer-based testing environment. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(2), 221–241. doi:10.1007/s40692-018-0105-1
  • MacIntyre, P. D. (2017). An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubncy, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 11–30). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44(2), 283–305. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x
  • Martin, S. N., & Siry, C. (2012). Using video in science teacher education: An analysis of the utilization of video-based media by teacher educators and researchers. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 417–433). Dortrecht: Springer.
  • McCroskey, J. C. (1970). Measures of communication-bound anxiety. Speech Monographs, 37(4), 269–288. doi:10.1080/03637757009375677
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Min, S., He, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Review of recent empirical research (2011-2018) on language assessment in China. Language Teaching, 53(3), 316–340. doi:10.1017/S0261444820000051
  • Mitchell, V. W., & Bakewell, C. (1995). Learning without doing enhancing oral presentation skills through peer review. Management Learning, 26(3), 353–366. doi:10.1177/1350507695263005
  • Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003
  • Mörtberg, E., Jansson-Fröjmark, M., Pettersson, A., & Hennlid-Oredsson, T. (2018). Psychometric properties of the personal report of public speaking anxiety (PRPSA) in a sample of university students in Sweden. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 11(4), 421–433. doi:10.1007/s41811-018-0022-0
  • Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., & Montanero, M. (2018). Oral presentations in higher education: A comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 138–150. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1303032
  • Murphy, K., & Barry, S. (2016). Feed-forward: Students gaining more from assessment via deeper engagement in video-recorded presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 213–227. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.996206
  • Newsom, J. T. (2021). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) (unpublished course mateirals). Portland: Portland State University. Retrieved from http://web.pdx.edu/∼newsomj/mvclass/ho_ancova.pdf.
  • Nicol, D., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 64–77).London: Routledge.
  • Özdemir-Yılmazer, M., & Özkan, Y. (2017). Classroom assessment practices of English language instructor. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(2), 324–345.
  • Park, G. P. (2014). Factor analysis of the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale in Korean learners of English as a foreign language. Psychological Reports, 115(1), 261–275. doi:10.2466/28.11.PR0.115c10z2
  • Pérez, M. C. I., Vidal-Puga, J., & Juste, M. R. P. (2020). The role of self and peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1–10. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526
  • Pribyl, C. B., Keaten, J., & Sakamoto, M. (2001). The effectiveness of a skills-based program in reducing public speaking anxiety. Japanese Psychological Research, 43(3), 148–155. doi:10.1111/1468-5884.t01-1-00171
  • Quigley, B. L., & Nyquist, J. D. (1992). Using video technology to provide feedback to students in performance courses. Communication Education, 41(3), 324–334. doi:10.1080/03634529209378892
  • Rausch, J. R., Maxwell, S. E., & Kelley, K. (2003). Analytic methods for questions pertaining to a randomized pretest, posttest, follow-up design. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology : The Official Journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 32(3), 467–486. doi:10.1207/s15374424jccp3203_15
  • Reinholz, D. (2016). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 301–315. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982
  • Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000505
  • Ritchie, S. M. (2016). Self-assessment of video-recorded presentations: Does it improve skills? Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 207–221. doi:10.1177/1469787416654807
  • Santagata, R., Zannoni, C., & Stigler, J. W. (2007). The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–140. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9029-9
  • Scovel, T. (1991). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. In E. K. Horwitz & D. J. Young (Eds.), Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications (pp. 15–24). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8), 1–10.
  • Simpson, T., Holden, K., Merrick, D., Dawson, S., & Bedford, L. (2019). Does video feedback & peer observation offer a valid method of reinforcing oral presentation training for undergraduate biochemists? Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 262–283. doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1587717
  • Şimşek, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Anxiety and L2 self-images: The ‘anxious self. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubncy, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 51–69). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  • Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., et al. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 58–71.
  • Su, Y. R. (2015). An overview of the development of research on public speaking course from 2004 to 2013. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 415–429. doi:10.1515/cjal-2015-0027
  • Tapingkae, P., Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G. J., & Srisawasdi, N. (2020). Effects of a formative assessment-based contextual gaming approach on students’ digital citizenship behaviours, learning motivations, and perceptions. Computers & Education, 159(16). 103998. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.
  • Taras, M. (2008). Summative and formative assessment: Perceptions and realities. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 172–192. doi:10.1177/1469787408091655
  • To, J., & Panadero, E. (2019). Peer assessment effects on the self-assessment process of first-year undergraduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 920–932. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559
  • Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249
  • Tsang, A. (2020). The relationship between tertiary-level students’ self-perceived presentation delivery and public speaking anxiety: A mixed-methods study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1060–1072. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1718601
  • Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161–1174. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
  • van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Braeken, J. (2014). Student perceptions of assessment and student self-efficacy in competence-based education. Educational Studies, 40(3), 330–351. doi:10.1080/03055698.2014.898577
  • van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2015). Towards a set of design principles for developing oral presentation competence: A synthesis of research in higher education. Educational Research Review, 14, 62–80. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.002
  • van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2017a). Fostering oral presentation performance: Does the quality of feedback differ when provided by the teacher, peers or peers guided by tutor? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 953–966. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1212984
  • van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2017b). The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1671–1685. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1117064
  • van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., Noroozi, O., Roozen, M., Bos, T., … Mulder, M. (2019). Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback. Computers & Education, 134, 78–97. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.006
  • Vattoy, K.-D., & Smith, K. (2019). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ feedback practice in teaching English as a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 260–268. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.024
  • Wang, Y.-C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.881386
  • Wang, L., Liu, H., & Zheng, C. (2020). Learners’ perceptions of English public speaking anxiety and competence in video-based formative assessment. In L.-H. Wong, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Global Chinese Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 1358–1361). Lanzhou, China: Northwest Normal University.
  • Wongwatkit, C., Srisawasdi, N., Hwang, G.-J., & Panjaburee, P. (2017). Influence of an integrated learning diagnosis and formative assessment-based personalized web learning approach on students learning performances and perceptions. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 889–903. doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1224255
  • Woodrow, L. (2006). Anxiety and speaking English as a second language. RELC Journal, 37(3), 308–328. doi:10.1177/0033688206071315
  • Yan, J., & Horwitz, E. (2008). Learners’ perceptions of how anxiety interacts with personal and instructional factors to influence their achievement in English: A qualitative analysis of EFL learners in China. Language Learning, 58(1), 151–183. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00437.x
  • Yu, X. (2018). Foreign language learning anxiety in China: Theories and applications in English language teaching. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–3. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7662-6
  • Zahonero, M. L. (2019). Mobile formative assessment and affective factors in Italian university students of Spanish. Rivista Di Psicolinguistica Applicata-Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 27–47.
  • Zhan, Y., & So, W. W. M. (2017). Views and practices from the chalkface: Development of a formative assessment multimedia learning environment. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 26(4), 501–515. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2017.1345783
  • Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2019). Sources of college EFL learners’ self-efficacy in the English public speaking domain. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 47–59. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.004
  • Zhang, X., Ardasheva, Y., & Austin, B. W. (2020). Self-efficacy and English public speaking performance: A mixed method approach. English for Specific Purposes, 59, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2020.02.001
  • Zheng, L., Zhang, X., & Cui, P. (2020). The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 372–386. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1644603
  • Zheng, C., & Li, C. (2015). Application of formative assessment in a Chinese EFL course. In M. Li & Y. Zhao (Eds.), Exploring learning & teaching in higher education (pp. 395−410). Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55352-3_18
  • Zheng, C., Li, C., & Lu, Z. (2012). An empirical study of applying formative assessment to an EFL public speaking course. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), 14(5), 112–118.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.