Mobile-assisted pronunciation learning with feedback from peers and/or automatic speech recognition: a mixed-methods study

References

• Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2020). Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–32. doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293
   Google Scholar
• Bodnar, S., Cucchiarini, C., de Vries, B. P., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2017). Learner affect in computerised L2 oral grammar practice with corrective feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 223–246. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1302964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J. (1987). Chinese speakers. In M. Swan & B. Smith (Eds.), Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems (pp. 224–237). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83–96. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, T. L., Liou, H. C., & Yeh, Y. (2007). A study of web-based oral activities enhanced by automatic speech recognition for EFL college learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 209–233. doi:10.1080/09588220701489374
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, D., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Linguistic dimensions of second language accent and comprehensibility: Nonnative listeners’ perspectives. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(2), 160–182. doi:10.1075/jslp.2.2.02cro
   Google Scholar
• Dao, P. (2020). Effect of interaction strategy instruction on learner engagement in peer interaction. System, 91, 102244. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, B. P., Cucchiarini, C., Bodnar, S., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2015). Spoken grammar practice and feedback in an ASR-based CALL system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 550–576. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.889713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (2017). Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding, D. (2006). The pronunciation of English by speakers from China. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English, 27(2), 175–198. doi:10.1075/eww.27.2.04det
   Google Scholar
• Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C. (2013). The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41(1), 25–37. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, K., & Chen, S. (2020). Effects of an automatic speech recognition system with peer feedback on pronunciation instruction for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–21. doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1839504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38(4), 371–394. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Peer feedback on college students’ writing: Exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1433–1447. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1325854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, L. (2018). Digital affordances on WeChat: Learning Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 27–52. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1376687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levis, J. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. doi:10.2307/3588485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 184–202. doi:10.1017/S0267190508070098
   Google Scholar
• Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2015). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French/y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25. doi:10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, M. L. (2014). The affordance of speech recognition technology for EFL learning in an elementary school setting. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 79–93. doi:10.1080/17501229.2012.756491
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311. doi:10.1017/S0958344019000065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, B. (2016). Evaluating a computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) technique for efficient classroom instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 451–476. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.963123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. (2020). Interaction, feedback and task research in second language learning: Methods and design. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrews, M. M., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). Establishing an empirical basis for priorities in pronunciation teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 3(2), 267–287. doi:10.1075/jslp.3.2.05mca
   Google Scholar
• McCrocklin, S. (2019a). ASR-based dictation practice for second language pronunciation improvement. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 5(1), 98–118. doi:10.1075/jslp.16034.mcc
   Google Scholar
• McCrocklin, S. (2019b). Learners’ feedback regarding ASR-based dictation practice for pronunciation learning. CALICO Journal, 36(2), 119–137. doi:10.1558/cj.34738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mroz, A. (2018). Seeing how people hear you: French learners experiencing intelligibility through automatic speech recognition. Foreign Language Annals, 51(3), 617–637. doi:10.1111/flan.12348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393–408. doi:10.1080/09588220802447651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2019). Using technology for pronunciation teaching, learning, and assessment. In M. C. Pennington & P. Rogerson-Revell (Eds.), English pronunciation teaching and research (pp. 235–286). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Raes, A., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A longitudinal study to understand students’ acceptance of technological reform. When Experiences Exceed Expectations. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 533–552.
   Google Scholar
• Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, 69(3), 652–708. doi:10.1111/lang.12345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, Y., & Saito, K. (2017). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 589–608. doi:10.1177/1362168816643111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179. doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.639884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626. doi:10.1017/S0272263112000356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvi, A. F. (2020). Qualitative content analysis. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 440–452). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, P. H. (2015). Computer-assisted pronunciation learning in a collaborative context: A case study in Taiwan. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, P. H. (2019). Beyond self-directed computer-assisted pronunciation learning: A qualitative investigation of a collaborative approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 713–744. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1614069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doremalen, J., Boves, L., Colpaert, J., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2016). Evaluating automatic speech recognition-based language learning systems: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 833–851. doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1167090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar