The effect of prosody instruction in developing listening comprehension skills by interpreter trainees: does methodology matter?

References

• Adair-Hauck, B., Willingham-McLain, L., & Youngs, B. E. (2013). Evaluating the integration of technology and second language learning. CALICO Journal, 17(2), 269–306. doi:10.1558/cj.v17i2.269-306
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S.-L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baştuğ, M., & Keskin, H. K. (2012). The relationship between fluent reading skills and comprehension level (literal and inferential). Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 227–244.
   Google Scholar
• Beauvois, M. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(2), 198–217. doi:10.3138/cmlr.54.2.198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J., Najmi, A., & Ehsani, F. (1999). Subarashii: Encounters in Japanese spoken language education. CALICO Journal, 16, 361–384. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.16.3.361-384.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., Van Laer, S., De Wever, B., & Elen, J. (2015). Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning. Project Report of ALOSBO WP2 - 15.06.2015. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-6905076
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511732959.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, K. A. (2003). Improving high school English language learners’ second language listening through strategy instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 383–408. ­doi:10.1080/15235882.2003.10162600
   Google Scholar
• Carrio Pastor, M. L. (2009). Enhancing learner-teacher collaboration through the use of online activities. In I. Gonzalez-Pueyo, C. Foz, M. Jaime, & M. J. Luzon (Eds.), Teaching academic and professional English online (pp. 107–126). Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Oxford, Wien: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. K., & Hsu, C. K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 155–180. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.536952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2007). The impact of teaching explicit listening strategies to adult intermediate- and advanced-level ESL university students [Ed.D. dissertation]. Duquesne University. Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/418
   Google Scholar
• Conacher, J. E., Taalas, P., & Vogel, T. (2004). New language learning and teaching environments: How does ICT fit in? In A. Chambers, J. E. Conacher, & J. Littlemore (Eds.), ICT and language learning: Integrating pedagogy and practice (pp. 9–32). Birmingham, AL: Birmingham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2005). Lexical stress. In D. B. Pisoni, & R. E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 264–289).Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. doi:10.2307/3588486
   Google Scholar
• Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121945. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682–706. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., Steed, A., & Applebee, A. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312–335. doi:10.14742/ajet.1289
   Google Scholar
• Engwall, O. (2012). Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 37–64. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.582845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research – towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1–2), 1–32. doi:10.1080/09588220500132274
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. (1957). Word stress in Persian. Language, 33(2), 123–135. doi:10.2307/410724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 399–423. doi:10.2307/3588487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimeno Sanz, A. (2009). Online course design and delivery: The Ingenio authoring system. In I. Gonzalez-Pueyo, C. Foz, M. Jaime, & M. J. Luzon (Eds.), Teaching academic and professional English online (pp. 83–105). Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Oxford, Wien: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 435–456. doi:10.1177/1362168811412026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201–223. doi:10.2307/3588378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayati, A., & Mohmedi, F. (2011). The effect of films with and without subtitles on listening comprehension of EFL learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 181–192. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, A. S. (2014). The phonetics and phonology of prosodic prominence in Persian [Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Tokyo. Retrieved from http://roa.rutgers.edu/content/article/files/1314_hosseini_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, L. (2016). An empirical examination of EFL learners’ perceptual learning styles and acceptance of ASR-based computer-assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 881–900. doi:10.1080/09588221.2015.1069747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, S., & Tanaka, K. (2015). Reading aloud performance and listening ability in an L2: The case of college-level Japanese EFL users. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 05(02), 187–206. doi:10.4236/ojml.2015.52015
   Google Scholar
• Keskin, H. K., Ari, G., & Baştuğ, M. (2019). Role of prosodic reading in listening comprehension. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(1), 59–65. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.1p.59
   Google Scholar
• Lado, R. (1957). Languages across cultures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 184–202. doi:10.1017/S0267190508070098
   Google Scholar
• Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2014). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French/y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25. doi:10.1558/cj.v32i1.25962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liakin, D., Cardoso, W., & Liakina, N. (2017). Mobilizing instruction in a second-language context: Learners’ perceptions of two speech technologies. Languages, 2(3), 11–21. doi:10.3390/languages2030011.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2013). Examining students’ perceptions of Computer-Assisted Interpreter Training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 7(1), 71–89. doi:10.1080/13556509.2013.10798844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. C., & Hung, P.-Y. (2016). Teaching pronunciation with Computer Assisted Pronunciation Instruction in a technological university. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 1939–1943. doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.040902.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56, 818–826. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, B. (2016). Evaluating a computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) technique for efficient classroom instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 451–476. doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.963123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu, V. T. M., Lian, A.-P., & Siriyothin, P. (2021). Developing EFL learners’ listening comprehension through a computer-assisted self-regulated prosody-based listening platform. CALL-Electronic Journal, 22(1), 246–263. Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/22-1/Luu-Lian-Siriyothin2021.pd
   Google Scholar
• Macedo-Rouet, M., Ney, M., Charles, S., & Lallich-Boidin, G. (2009). Students’ performance and satisfaction with web vs. paper-based practice quizzes and lecture notes. Computers & Education, 53(2), 375–384. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAndrews, M. (2020). Prosody instruction for ESL listening comprehension [Ph.D. dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, Northern Arizona University.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. L. (2014). Variation in adult learners’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 215–234). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrpour, S., Shoushtari, S. A., & Shirazi, P. H. N. (2016). Computer assisted pronunciation training: The effect of accent reduction software on Iranian EFL learners’ pronunciation. CALL-Electronic Journal, 17(1), 97–112. http://callej.org/journal/17-1/Mehrpour-Shoushtari-Shirazi2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moradimokhles, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). The effect of online vs. blended learning in developing English language skills by nursing students: An experimental study. Interactive Learning Environments, (published online, ahead of print). doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1739079.
   Google Scholar
• Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea?The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. (1999). Developing the pedagogical ICT competence of modern foreign languages teacher trainees. Situation: All change and plus ça change. Journal of IT for Teacher Education – Special Edition on Modern Foreign Languages, 8, 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2001). Effective feedback on L2 pronunciation in ASR-based CALL. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Assisted Language Learning, Artificial Intelligence in Education Conference (pp. 40–48). AIED.
   Google Scholar
• Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441–467. doi:10.1076/call.15.5.441.13473
   Google Scholar
• Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393–408. doi:10.1080/09588220802447651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning − parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 163–178. doi:10.1017/S0958344005000224
   Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173–192. Retrieved from https://www.lltjournal.org/item-detail/2875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1993). Research update on teaching L2 listening. System, 21(2), 205–211. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(93)90042-F
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 124–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: Promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 427–440. doi:10.1076/call.12.5.427.5693
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. C., & Esling, J. H. (1996). Computer-assisted development of spoken language skills. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 153–189). Houston, TX: Athelstan.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M., Weinberg, A., & Sarma, N. (2009). To like or not to like! Student perceptions of technological activities for learning French as a second langue at five Canadian institutions. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(5), 869–896. doi:10.3138/cmlr.65.5.869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani, H., Rietveld, T., & Gussenhoven, C. (2015). Stress “deafness” reveals absence of lexical marking of stress or tone in the adult Grammar. PLoS One, 10(12), e0143968. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, V. (2017). Word-level prominence in Persian: An experimental study. Language and Speech, 60(4), 571–596. doi:10.1177/0023830916684862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagarra, N., & Zapata, G. (2008). Blending classroom instruction with online homework: A study of student perceptions of computer assisted L2 learning. ReCALL, 20(2), 208–224. doi:10.1017/S0958344008000621
   Google Scholar
• Sander, R. F. (2005). Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, costs reduction and effects on student learning. Foreign Language Annals, 38(4), 523–532. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scida, E. E., & Saury, R. E. (2006). Hybrid courses and their impact on student and classroom performance: A case study at the University of Virginia. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 517–531. doi:10.1558/cj.v23i3.517-531
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student perceptions on language learning in a technological environment: Implications for the new millennium. Language Learning & Technology, 6, 165–180. Retrieved from https://www.lltjournal.org/item/2378
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended learning environment. ReCALL, 19(1), 57–78. doi:10.1017/S0958344007000511
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 744–765. doi:10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, R. (2009). The potential of blended learning environments. In I. Gonzalez-Pueyo, C. Foz, M. Jaime, & M. J. Luzon (Eds.), Teaching academic and professional English online (pp. 35–56). Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Oxford, Wien: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, P.-H. (2019). Beyond self-directed computer-assisted pronunciation learning: A qualitative investigation of a collaborative approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 713–744. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1614069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laer, S., & Elen, J. (2017). In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1395–1454. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijngaarden, S. J. (2001). Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech. Speech Communication, 35(1–2), 103–113. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00098-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenkimaleki, M. (2017). Effect of prosody awareness training on the quality of consecutive interpreting between English and Farsi. Utrecht: LOT. Retrieved from https://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/459_fulletext.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yenkimaleki, M., & Van Heuven, V. J. (2016). The effect of prosody teaching on developing word recognition skills for interpreter trainees: An experimental study. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 7(1), 1101–1107. doi:10.24297/jal.v7i1.5158
   Google Scholar
• Yenkimaleki, M., & Van Heuven, V. J. (2018): The effect of teach­ing prosody awareness on interpreting performance: an experimental study of consecutive interpreting from English into Farsi. Perspectives, Studies in Trans­lation Theory and Practice, 26(1), 84–99. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2017.1315824
   Google Scholar
• Yenkimaleki, M., & Van Heuven, V. J. (2019). Effects of prosody awareness training on the intelligibility of Iranian interpreter trainees in English. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 291–309. doi:10.1075/dujal.17023.yen
   Google Scholar
• Yenkimaleki, M., & Van Heuven, V. J. (2020). Relative contribution of explicit teaching of segmentals vs. prosody to the quality of consecutive interpreting by Farsi-to-English interpreting trainees. Interactive Learning Environments (published online). doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1789673
   Google Scholar