Clinical supervisors’ experience of giving feedback to students during clinical integrated learning

References

• Adcroft A 2011 The mythology of feedback. Higher Education Research and Development 30: 405–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman M, Molloy E, Ajjawi R, Keating J 2013 ‘Is there a plan B?’ Clinical educators supporting underperforming students in practice settings. Teaching in Higher Education 18: 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You R, Hayes V, Varaklis K, Trowbridge R, Kemp H, McKelvy D 2017 Feedback for learners in medical education: What is known? A scoping review. Academic Medicine 92: 1346–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing-You RG, Trowbridge R 2009 Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA 302: 1330–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair A, McGinty S 2013 Feedback-dialogues: Exploring the student perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38: 466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud D, Molloy E 2013 Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Branch TW, Paranjape TA 2002 Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Academic Medicine 77: 1185–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockbank A, McGill I 1998 Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. England: Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen R, Boud D, Sampson J 2001 Dealing with problems encountered in assessment of peer learning. In: Falchikov N (Ed) Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routlede Farmer.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Poth CN 2017 Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• De SK, Henke PK, Ailawadi G, Dimick JB, Colletti LM 2004 Attending, house officer, and medical student perceptions about teaching in the third-year medical school general surgery clerkship. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 199: 932–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeClute J, Ladyshewsky R 1993 Enhancing clinical competence using a collaborative clinical education model. Physical Therapy 73: 683–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H 2008 The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62: 107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluit CV, Bolhuis S, Klaassen T, De Visser M, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M 2013 Residents provide feedback to their clinical teachers: Reflection through dialogue. Medical Teacher 35: 1485–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac-Caille AM, Oermann MH 2001 Student and faculty perceptions of effective clinical instructors in ADN programs. Journal of Nursing Education 40: 347–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B 2004 Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24: 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson S 2013 Professional feedback. In: Stefan Gunnarsson (Eds). Medvetna Mötens Magi, pp.1–136. Bromma: Gunnarssons Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Halvarsson A, Sellberg M 2016 En film om återkoppling [Feedback film]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avFByXh_tCw.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie J, Timperley H 2007 The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77: 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesketh EA, Laidlaw JM 2002 Developing the teaching instinct, 1: Feedback. Medical Teacher 24: 245–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins R, Hartley P, Skelton A 2001 Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education 6: 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N 2008 Clinical reasoning in the health professions E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham M 2007 Fast and effective feedback: Are model answers the answer? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32: 601–611.
   Google Scholar
• Jarski RW, Kulig K, Olson RE 1990 Clinical teaching in physical therapy: Student and teacher perceptions. Physical Therapy 70: 173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen AR, Wright AS, Kim S, Horvath KD, Calhoun KE 2012 Educational feedback in the operating room: A gap between resident and faculty perceptions. American Journal of Surgery 204: 248–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilminster SM, Jolly BC 2000 Effective supervision in clinical practice settings: A literature review. Medical Education 34: 827–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K 2018 Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG 1985 Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry, pp. 289–331. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Luhanga F, Yonge O, Myrick F 2008 Precepting an unsafe student: The role of the faculty. Nurse Education Today 28: 227–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty M, Higgins A 2003 Moving to an all graduate profession: Preparing preceptors for their role. Nurse Education Today 23: 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy E 2009 Time to pause: Giving and receiving feedback in clinical education. In: Delany C, Molloy E (Eds) Clinical education in the health professions, pp. 128–146. Chatswood: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Monrouxe LV, Rees CE, Lewis NJ, Cleland JA 2011 Medical educators’ social acts of explaining passing underperformance in students: A qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education 16: 239–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D 2006 Formative assessment and self‐Regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31: 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öjestad G 2010 Kritikk [Criticism]. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ 2002 Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich PR, Zusho A 2002 The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In: Wigfield A, Eccles JS (Eds) Development of achievement motivation, pp. 249–284. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pringle M, Bradley C, Carmichael C, Wallis H, Moore A 1995 Significant event auditing. A study of the feasibility and potential of case-based auditing in primary medical care. Occasional Paper (Royal College of General Practitioners) 70: i–viii, 1–71.
   Google Scholar
• Quilligan S 2007 Communication skills teaching: The challenge of giving effective feedback. Clinical Teacher 4: 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad A 1983 On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science 28: 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler DR 1989 Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18: 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sender Liberman A, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S 2005 Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Medical Teacher 27: 470–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedley AM 2008 Becoming and being a preceptor: A phenomenological study. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 39: 185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofaer S 1999 Qualitative methods: What are they and why use them? Health Services Research 34: 1101–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens AM, Scherpbier AJ 2010 The Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Academic Medicine 85: 1732–1738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stough LM, Emmer ET 1998 Teachers’ emotions and test feedback. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 11: 341–361.
   Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Ferguson M, Raghunathan R 2001 Mood as a resource in processing self-relevant information. In: Forgas J (Ed) Handbook of affect and social cognition, pp. 256–274. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vorvick LJ, Avnon T, Emmett RS, Robins L 2008 Improving teaching by teaching feedback. Medical Education 42: 540–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watzlawick P, Bavelas JB, Jackson DD 2011 Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: WW Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wellings K, Branigan P, Mitchell K 2000 Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: Using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Culture, Health and Sexuality 2: 255–267.
   Google Scholar