Random forest models of food safety behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic

References

• Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen M. 2017. The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.; [accessed 2023 November 10]. 10.4135/9781483381411.
   Google Scholar
• Altarrah D, Alshami E, Alhamad N, Albesher F, Devarajan S. 2021. The impact of coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic on food purchasing, eating behavior, and perception of food safety in Kuwait. Sustainability. 13(16):8987. doi: 10.3390/su13168987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmke B, Greenwell B. 2020. The R series hands-on machine learning with R. In CRC Press. [accessed 2023 November 10]. https://www.routledge.com/Hands-On-Machine-Learning-with-R/Boehmke-Greenwell/p/book/9781138495685.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. 2017. Classification and regression trees. 1st ed.Routledge. [accessed 2023 November 10]. 10.1201/9781315139470.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. 2002. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 16:321–357. doi: 10.1613/jair.953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Chen X, De Vos J, Lai X, Witlox F. 2019. Applying a random forest method approach to model travel mode choice behavior. Travel Behav Soc. 14:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YP, Popovich MP. 2002. Correlation. SAGE Publications, Inc.; [accessed 2023 November 10]. 10.4135/9781412983808.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz GI, Fokoue-Nkoutche A, Nannicini G, Samulowitz H. 2017. An effective algorithm for hyperparameter optimization of neural networks. IBM J Res Dev. 61(4/5):9–1. doi: 10.1147/JRD.2017.2709578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, Freeman ALJ, Recchia G, van der Bles AM, Spiegelhalter D, van der Linden S. 2020. Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. J Risk Res. 23(7–8):994–1006. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda-Chodak A, Lukasiewicz M, Zięć G, Florkiewicz A, Filipiak-Florkiewicz A. 2020. Covid-19 pandemic and food: present knowledge, risks, consumers fears and safety. Trends Food Sci Technol. 105:145–160. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engchuan W, Dimopoulos AC, Tyrovolas S, Caballero FF, Sanchez-Niubo A, Arndt H, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Haro JM, Chatterji S, Panagiotakos DB. 2019. Sociodemographic indicators of health status using a machine learning approach and data from the English longitudinal study of aging (ELSA). Med Sc Monit. 25:1994–2001. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawagreh K, Gaber MM, Elyan E. 2014. Random forests: from early developments to recent advancements. Syst Sc Control Eng. 2(1):602–609. doi: 10.1080/21642583.2014.956265.
   Google Scholar
• Hand DJ, Christen P, Kirielle N. 2021. F*: an interpretable transformation of the F-measure. Mach Learn. 110(3):451–456. doi: 10.1007/s10994-021-05964-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein AY, Falcarin P, Sadiq AT. 2021. Enhancement performance of random forest algorithm via one hot encoding for IoT IDS. Period Eng Nat Sci (PEN). 9(3):579–591. doi: 10.21533/PEN.V9I3.2204.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. 2020. IBM SPSS Modeler (V18.2.2). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Imhoff R, Lamberty P. 2020 Nov. A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 11(8):1110–1118. doi: 10.1177/1948550620934692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson W, Wichern D. 2007. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 6th ed. Upper Sadle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kudashkina K, Corradini MG, Thirunathan P, Yada RY, Fraser ED. 2022. Artificial intelligence technology in food safety: a behavioral approach. Trends Food Sci Technol. 123:376–381. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn M, Johnson K. 2019. Applied predictive modeling. 1st ed. NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kwol VS, Eluwole KK, Avci T, Lasisi TT. 2020. Another look into the knowledge attitude practice (KAP) model for food control: an investigation of the mediating role of food handlers’ attitudes. Food Control. 110:107025. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Shin SY, Briand L, Nejati S. 2023. Probabilistic WCET estimation for weakly hard real-time systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.10288.
   Google Scholar
• Lin N, Roberts KR. 2020. Using the theory of planned behavior to predict food safety behavioral intention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hosp. 90:102612. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litwin H, Levinsky M, Stanley JT. 2021. Network-exposure severity and self-protective behaviors: the case of COVID-19. Innov Aging. 5(2):1–11. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igab015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Mutukumira AN, Shen C, Dragan D. 2021. Food safety knowledge, attitudes, and eating behavior in the advent of the global coronavirus pandemic. PLOS ONE. 16(12):e0261832. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0261832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meixner O, Katt F. 2020. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on consumer food safety perceptions—A choice-based willingness to pay study. Sustainability. 12(18):7270. doi: 10.3390/su12187270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney SJ, Joshi S, Cerda M, Kennedy GJ, Beard JR, Rundle AG. 2017. Contextual correlates of physical activity among older adults: neighborhood environment-wide association study (ne-was). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 26(4):495–504. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucinhato RMD, da Cunha DT, Barros SCF, Zanin LM, Auad LI, Weis GCC, Saccol de ALF, Stedefeldt E. 2022. Behavioral predictors of household food-safety practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: extending the theory of planned behavior. Food Control. 134:108719. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2021.108719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TT, Huang JZ, Nguyen TT. 2015. Unbiased feature selection in learning random forests for high-dimensional data. Sci World J. 2015:1–18. doi: 10.1155/2015/471371.
   Google Scholar
• Oldroyd RA, Morris MA, Birkin M. 2021. Predicting food safety compliance for informed food outlet inspections: a machine learning approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(23):12635. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Rizov M. 2022. Consumer behaviour in sourcing meals during COVID-19: implications for business and marketing. Sustainability. 14(21):13837. doi: 10.3390/su142113837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, Real K. 2003. Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Hum Commun Res. 29(3):370–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00844.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider CR, Dryhurst S, Kerr J, Freeman ALJ, Recchia G, Spiegelhalter D, van der Linden S. 2021. COVID-19 risk perception: a longitudinal analysis of its predictors and associations with health protective behaviours in the United Kingdom. J Risk Res. 24(3–4):294–313. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2021.1890637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soon JM, Vanany I, Wahab IRA, Sani NA, Hamdan RH, Jamaludin MH. 2022. Protection motivation theory and consumers’ food safety behaviour in response to COVID-19. Food Control. 138:109029. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanase LM, Kerr J, Freeman ALJ, Schneider CR. 2022 Aug 3. COVID-19 risk perception and hoax beliefs in the US immediately before and after the announcement of president Trump’s diagnosis. R Soc Open Sci. 9(8):212013. doi: 10.1098/rsos.212013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas MS, Feng Y. 2021a. Consumer risk perception and trusted sources of food safety information during the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Control. 130:108279. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2021.108279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas MS, Feng Y. 2021b. Food handling practices in the era of COVID-19: a mixed-method longitudinal needs assessment of consumers in the United States. J Food Protection. 84(7):1176–1187. doi: 10.4315/JFP-21-006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ. 2019. Principles of confounder selection. Eur J Epidemiol. 34(3):211–219. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00494-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lissa CJ, Stroebe W, van Dellen MR, Leander NP, Agostini M, Draws T, Grygoryshyn A, Gützgow B, Kreienkamp J, Vetter CS, et al. 2022. Using machine learning to identify important predictors of COVID-19 infection prevention behaviors during the early phase of the pandemic. Patterns. 3(4):100482. doi: 10.1016/J.PATTER.2022.100482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei P, Lu Z, Song J. 2015. Variable importance analysis: a comprehensive review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 142(October):399–432. doi: 10.1016/J.RESS.2015.05.018.
   Google Scholar
• WHO: WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. 2022. World Health Organization. [accessed 2023 Sep 26]. https://covid19.who.int/?adgroupsurvey={adgroupsurvey}&gclid=CjwKCAjw_MqgBhAGEiwAnYOAej8iEBfCeFjt4gpiW5Vy2jBipIkYCgqxDW36MgGvDEdgxB_-O6iR5hoCxlkQAvD_BwE.
   Google Scholar
• Young I, Greig J, Wilhelm BJ, Waddell LA. 2019. Effectiveness of food handler training and education interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Food Protection. 82(10):1714–1728. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young I, Waddell L, Harding S, Greig J, Mascarenhas M, Sivaramalingam B, Pham MT, Papadopoulos A. 2015. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of food safety education interventions for consumers in developed countries. BMC Public Health. 15(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2171-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young I, Waddell L, Nychas G-J. 2016. Barriers and facilitators to safe food handling among consumers: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research studies. PLOS ONE. 11(12):167695. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0167695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yao JT. 2017. Gini objective functions for three-way classifications. Int J Approx Reason. 81:103–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2016.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar