Influence of the addition of different ingredients on the bioaccessibility of glucose released from rice during dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal digestion

References

• Alonso R, Aguirre A, Marzo F. 2000. Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chem. 68(2):159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi R, Capuano E, Nasirpour A, Pellegrini N, Golmakani MT, Hosseini SMH, Farahnaky A. 2019. Varietal differences in the effect of rice ageing on starch digestion. Food Hydrocoll. 95 (March):358–366.
   Google Scholar
• Boers HM, Seijen Ten Hoorn J, Mela DJ. 2015. A systematic review of the influence of rice characteristics and processing methods on postprandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses. Br J Nutr. 114(7):1035–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornhorst GM, Singh RP. 2012. Bolus formation and disintegration during digestion of food carbohydrates. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 11(2):101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J. 2002. Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 76(1):281S–285S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkorb A, Egger L, Alminger M, Alvito P, Assunção R, Ballance S, Bohn T, Bourlieu-Lacanal C, Boutrou R, Carrière F, et al. 2019. INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat Protoc. 14(4):991–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calbet JAL, MacLean DA. 1997. Role of caloric content on gastric emptying in humans. J Physiol. 498(2):553–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang UJ, Hong YH, Jung EY, Suh HJ. 2014. Rice and the glycemic index. In: Wheat and rice in disease prevention and health. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; p. 357–363.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Du X, Chen P, Guo L, Xu Y, Zhou X. 2017. Morphologies and gelatinization behaviours of high-amylose maize starches during heat treatment. Carbohydr Polym. 157:637–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui SW, Wu Y, Ding H. 2013. The range of dietary fibre ingredients and a comparison of their technical functionality. In: Delcour JA, Kaisa Poutanen, editors. Fibre-rich and wholegrain foods: improving quality. New York: Elsevier Ltd; p. 96–119.
   Google Scholar
• Deepa G, Singh V, Naidu KA. 2010. A comparative study on starch digestibility, glycemic index and resistant starch of pigmented (“Njavara” and ‘Jyothi’) and a non-pigmented (‘IR 64’) rice varieties. J Food Sci Technol. 47(6):644–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhingra D, Michael M, Rajput H, Patil RT. 2012. Dietary fibre in foods: a review. J Food Sci Technol. 49(3):255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2011. Regulation (EU) no. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers. Off J Eur Union. 304:18–63. doi:2004R0726 - v.7 of 05.06.2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes J, Madalena DA, Pinheiro AC, Vicente AA. 2020. Rice in vitro digestion: application of INFOGEST harmonized protocol for glycemic index determination and starch morphological study. J Food Sci Technol. 57(4):1393–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filho AMM, Pirozi MR, Borges JTDS, Pinheiro Sant'Ana HM, Chaves JBP, Coimbra JSDR. 2017. Quinoa: nutritional, functional, and antinutritional aspects. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 57(8):1618–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei M, Siddhuraju P, Becker K. 2003. Studies on the in vitro starch digestibility and the glycemic index of six different indigenous rice cultivars from the Philippines. Food Chem. 83(3):395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas D, Le Feunteun S, Panouillé M, Souchon I. 2018. The important role of salivary α-amylase in the gastric digestion of wheat bread starch. In: Food and function. 9(1):200–208.
   Google Scholar
• Goñi I, Garcia-Alonso A, Saura-Calixto F. 1997. A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index. Nutr Res. 17(3):427–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand RJ, Watkins JB, Torti FM. 1976. Development of the human gastrointestinal tract: a review. Gastroenterology. 70(5):790–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundy MML, Edwards CH, Mackie AR, Gidley MJ, Butterworth PJ, Ellis PR. 2016. Re-evaluation of the mechanisms of dietary fibre and implications for macronutrient bioaccessibility, digestion and postprandial metabolism. Br J Nutr. 116(5):816–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gularte MA, Gómez M, Rosell CM. 2012. Impact of legume flours on quality and in vitro digestibility of starch and protein from gluten-free cakes. Food Bioprocess Technol. 5(8):3142–3150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemalatha P, Bomzan DP, Sathyendra Rao BV, Sreerama YN. 2016. Distribution of phenolic antioxidants in whole and milled fractions of quinoa and their inhibitory effects on α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities. Food Chem. 199:330–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha SK, Singh HR, Prakash P. 2017. Dietary fiber and human health: an introduction. in: dietary fiber for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: fiber’s interaction between gut micoflora, sugar metabolism, weight control and cardiovascular health. New York: Elsevier Inc. p. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur B, Ranawana V, Henry J. 2016. The glycemic index of rice and rice products: a review, and Table of GI Values. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 56(2):215–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell AA, Eastwood MA, Mitchell WD. 1974. Physical characteristics of vegetable foodstuffs that could influence bowel function. J Sci Food Agric. 25(12):1457–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minekus M, Alminger M, Alvito P, Ballance S, Bohn T, Bourlieu C, Carrière F, Boutrou R, Corredig M, Dupont D, et al. 2014. A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food –an international consensus. Food Funct. 5(6):1113–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulet-Cabero A-I, Egger L, Portmann R, Ménard O, Marze S, Minekus M, Le Feunteun S, Sarkar A, Grundy MM-L, Carrière F, et al. 2020. A standardised semi-dynamic in vitro digestion method suitable for food –an international consensus. Food Funct. 11(2):1702–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakov G, Jukić M, Vasileva N, Stamatovska V, Dimov I, Komlenić DK. 2019. The influence of different sweeteners on in vitro starch digestion in biscuits with wheat flour and whole barley flour. Sci Study Res Chem Chem Eng Biotechnol Food Ind. 20(1):53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe T, Terashima H, Sakamoto A. 2017. A comparison of gastric emptying of soluble solid meals and clear fluids matched for volume and energy content: a pilot crossover study. Anaesthesia. 72(11):1344–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opazo-Navarrete M, Tagle Freire D, Boom RM, Janssen A. 2019. The influence of starch and fibre on in vitro protein digestibility of dry fractionated Quinoa Seed (Riobamba Variety). Food Biophys. 14(1):49–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palafox-Carlos H, Ayala-Zavala JF, González-Aguilar GA. 2011. The role of dietary fiber in the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of fruit and vegetable antioxidants. J Food Sci. 76(1):R6–R15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patindol JA, Siebenmorgen TJ, Wang Y-J. 2015. Impact of environmental factors on rice starch structure: a review. Starch – Stärke. 67(1–2):42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro AC, Coimbra MA, Vicente AA. 2016. In vitro behaviour of curcumin nanoemulsions stabilized by biopolymer emulsifiers – effect of interfacial composition. Food Hydrocoll. 52:460–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MS, Al-Farsi SA. 2005. Instrumental texture profile analysis (TPA) of date flesh as a function of moisture content. J Food Eng. 66(4):505–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MO, Ai Y, Leutcher JL, Jane J. 2013. Effects of cooking methods and starch structures on starch hydrolysis rates of rice. J Food Sci. 78(7):H1076–H1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribnicky DM, Roopchand DE, Oren A, Grace M, Poulev A, Lila MA, Havenaar R, Raskin I. 2014. Effects of a high fat meal matrix and protein complexation on the bioaccessibility of blueberry anthocyanins using the TNO gastrointestinal model (TIM-1). Food Chem. 142:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy P, Ijiri T, Okadome H, Nei D, Orikasa T, Nakamura N, Shiina T. 2008. Effect of processing conditions on overall energy consumption and quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Food Eng. 89(3):343–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer M, Höchstötter A, Jekle M, Arendt E, Becker T. 2013. Physicochemical and morphological characterization of different starches with variable amylose/amylopectin ratio. Food Hydrocoll. 32(1):52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapter FM, Henry RJ, Lee LS. 2008. Endosperm and starch granule morphology in wild cereal relatives. Plant Genet Res. 6(02):85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Sundarram A, Pandurangappa T, Murthy K. 2014. α-Amylase production and applications: a review. J Appl Environ Microbiol. 2(4):166–175.
   Google Scholar
• Świeca M, Sęczyk Ł, Gawlik-Dziki U, Dziki D. 2014. Bread enriched with quinoa leaves – the influence of protein-phenolics interactions on the nutritional and antioxidant quality. Food Chem. 162:54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syahariza ZA, Sar S, Hasjim J, Tizzotti MJ, Gilbert RG. 2013. The importance of amylose and amylopectin fine structures for starch digestibility in cooked rice grains. Food Chem. 136(2):742–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura M, Singh J, Kaur L, Ogawa Y. 2016. Impact of structural characteristics on starch digestibility of cooked rice. Food Chem. 191:91–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong THT, Louie J. 2017. The relationship between resistant starch and glycemic control: a review on current evidence and possible mechanisms. Starch/Staerke. 69:7–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolnough JW, Bird AR, Monro JA, Brennan CS. 2010. The effect of a brief salivary α-amylase exposure during chewing on subsequent in vitro starch digestion curve profiles. IJMS. 11(8):2780–2790.
   Google Scholar
• Yu L, Turner MS, Fitzgerald M, Stokes JR, Witt T. 2017. Review of the effects of different processing technologies on cooked and convenience rice quality. Trends Food Sci Technol. 59:124–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenel AM, Stewart ML. 2015. High amylose white rice reduces post-prandial glycemic response but not appetite in humans. Nutrients. 7(7):5362–5374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar