Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes: a systematic scoping review and analysis using the TIDieR checklist for reporting interventions

References

• Chapey R, editor. Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Association [Internet]. State of the nation stroke statistics. London (UK): Stroke Association; 2018. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/state_of_the_nation_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aphasia awareness [Internet]. London (UK): Stroke Association; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 6]. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/what-is-aphasia/aphasia-awareness
   Google Scholar
• Aphasia [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 23]. Available from: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/aphasia.
   Google Scholar
• Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD000425.
   Google Scholar
• Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the queen square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(5):498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey RR. A Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(1):172–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Ge L, Zheng Q, et al. Constraint-induced aphasia therapy for patients with aphasia: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020;7(3):349–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1621–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl B, Mohr B, Buscher V, et al. Efficacy of intensive aphasia therapy in patients with chronic stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(6):586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003;34(4):987–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Worrall L, Murray LL, et al. The top ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia. Aphasiology. 2017;31(2):131–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation [Internet]. Clinical guidelines for stroke management 2010. Melbourne (Australia): National Stroke Foundation; 2010. Available from: https://strokefoundation.org.au/what-we-do/treatment-programs/clinical-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation of New Zealand [Internet]. New Zealand clinical guidelines for stroke management 2010. Wellington (NZ): Stroke Foundation of New Zealand; 2010. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/nzclinicalguidelinesstrokemanagement2010activecontents.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [Internet]. Management of patients with stroke: rehabilitation, prevention and management of complications, and discharge planning: a national clinical guideline. Edinburgh (Scotland): Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2010. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/our-guidelines/management-of-patients-with-stroke-rehabilitation-prevention-and-management-of-complications-and-discharge-planning/
   Google Scholar
• Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2402–2448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense [Internet]. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. Version 4.0. Washington (DC): US Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense; 2019. Available from: https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/Rehab/stroke/VADoDStrokeRehabCPGFinal8292019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party [Internet]. National clinical guideline for stroke. Fifth edition. London (UK): Royal College of Physicians; 2016. Available from: https://www.strokeaudit.org/SupportFiles/Documents/Guidelines/2016-National-Clinical-Guideline-for-Stroke-5t-1.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Care [Internet]. London (UK): The Nuffield Trust; 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/public/resource/stroke-care
   Google Scholar
• Sentinal Stroke National Audit Programme: National Results – Clinical Annual Results Portfolio [dataset]. Sentinal Stroke National Audit Programme [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2020 Jul 27]. Available from: https://www.strokeaudit.org/results/Clinical-audit/National-Results.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists [Internet]. RCSLT resource manual for commissioning and planning services for SLCN: dysphagia. Updated 18/06/2013, minor amendments 14/07/14. London (UK): Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists; 2009. Available from: https://www.rcslt.org/-/media/Project/RCSLT/resource-manual-dysphagia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foster A, O’Halloran R, Rose M, et al. “Communication is taking a back seat”: speech pathologists’ perceptions of aphasia management in acute hospital settings. Aphasiology. 2016;30(5):585–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz RC, Hallowell B, Code C, et al. A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35(2):303–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme: Post-Acute Audit [dataset]. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 17]. Available from: https://www.strokeaudit.org/results/PostAcute/Services.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RJ, Gaynor C, Kerr M, et al. A consensus on stroke: early supported discharge. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1392–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley J. Selecting, combining, and bundling different therapy approaches. In: Coppens P, Patterson J, editors. Aphasia rehabilitation: clinical challenges. Burlington (MA): Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2018. p. 331–353.
   Google Scholar
• Wisenburn B, Mahoney K. A Meta-analysis of word-finding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(11):1338–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipper L, Marshall J, Boyle M, et al. Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base. Aphasiology. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1765305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Raymer AM, Lanyon LE, et al. A systematic review of gesture treatments for post-stroke aphasia. Aphasiology. 2013;27(9):1090–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogan E, Ciccone N, Godecke E. Behind the therapy door: what is “usual care” aphasia therapy in acute stroke management? Aphasiology. 2020;34(10):1291–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hachioui H, Lingsma H, van de Sandt-Koenderman M, et al. Recovery of aphasia after stroke: a 1-Year Follow-Up study. J Neurol. 2013;260(1):166–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarno MT, Levita E. Recovery in treated aphasia in the first year post-stroke. Stroke. 1979;10(6):663–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plowman E, Hentz B, Ellis C. Post-stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient-related and stroke-related factors. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(3):689–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiss WD, Thiel A. A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia. Brain Lang. 2006;98(1):118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace S. Complementing therapy using multimodal strategies. In: Coppens P, Patterson J, editors. Aphasia rehabilitation: clinical challenges. Burlington (MA): Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2018. p. 249–290.
   Google Scholar
• International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organisation; 2001 [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Northcott S. Social support in people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 2006;20(1):17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotiadou D, Northcott S, Chatzidaki A, et al. Aphasia blog talk: how does stroke and aphasia affect a person’s social relationships? Aphasiology. 2014;28(11):1281–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S. Talking about aphasia. Buckingham (UK): Open University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hinckley JJ. Investigating the predictors of lifestyle satisfaction among younger adults with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 1998;12(7-8):509–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerlind E, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Return to work after a stroke in working age persons; a six-year follow up. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wang C, Zhang N, et al. The association between post-stroke depression, aphasia, and physical independence in stroke patients at 3-month follow-up. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris R, Eccles A, Ryan B, et al. Prevalence of anxiety in people with aphasia after stroke. Aphasiology. 2017;31(12):1410–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafsten L, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Anxiety after stroke: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(9):769–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam JMC, Wodchis WP. The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Med Care. 2010;48(4):380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe T, Davidson B, Worrall L, et al. ‘You needed to rehab … families as well’: family members’ own goals for aphasia rehabilitation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(5):511–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford A, Douglas J, O’Halloran R. The experience of close personal relationships from the perspective of people with aphasia: thematic analysis of the literature. Aphasiology. 2018;32(4):367–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grawburg M, Howe T, Worrall L, et al. Describing the impact of aphasia on close family members using the ICF framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(14):1184–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland A. Counseling/coaching in chronic aphasia. Top Lang Disord. 2007;27(4):339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Armstrong E, et al. Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(12):1814–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Cherney LR. Communication partner training in aphasia: an updated systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(12):2202–2221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Witts H, Chater T. What speech and language therapy do community dwelling stroke survivors with aphasia receive in the UK? PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0200096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson B, Worrall L. Living with aphasia: a client-centered approach. In: Papathanasiou I, Coppens P, Potagas C, editors. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. Burlington (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2013. p. 255–274.
   Google Scholar
• Elman RJ, Bernstein-Ellis E. The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;42(2):411–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon LE, Rose ML, Worrall L. The efficacy of outpatient and community-based aphasia group interventions: a systematic review. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;15(4):359–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers CP. Social networks after the onset of aphasia: the impact of aphasia group attendance. Aphasiology. 2010;24(6–8):902–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Caute A, Chadd K, et al. Technology-enhanced writing therapy for people with aphasia: results of a quasi-randomized waitlist controlled study. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019;54(2):203–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caute A, Woolf C, Wilson S, et al. Technology-enhanced reading therapy for people with aphasia: findings from a quasirandomized waitlist controlled study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(12):4382–4416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet access - households and individuals [Internet]. London (UK): Office for National Statistics. 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/bulletins/internetaccesshouseholdsandindividuals/2019
   Google Scholar
• Zheng C, Lynch L, Taylor N. Effect of computer therapy in aphasia: a systematic review. Aphasiology. 2016;30(2–3):211–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie M, Macoir J, Bier N. Effectiveness of technologies in the treatment of post-stroke anomia: a systematic review. J Commun Disord. 2017;65:43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Association. Lived experience of stroke chapter 4 - rebuilding lives after stroke [Internet]. London (UK): Stroke Association; 2018. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/lived-experience-of-stroke-report/chapter-4-rebuilding-lives-after-stroke
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Association. Lived experience of stroke chapter 1 - hidden effects of stroke [Internet]. London (UK): Stroke Association; 2018. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/lived-experience-of-stroke-report/chapter-1-hidden-effects-of-stroke
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Association. Lived experience of stroke chapter 3 - caring for a stroke survivor [Internet]. London (UK): Stroke Association; 2018. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/lived-experience-of-stroke-report/chapter-3-caring-for-a-stroke-survivor
   Google Scholar
• University of Michigan [Internet]. The institute for human adjustment. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan; 1947. Available from: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015014559796&view=1up&seq=6
   Google Scholar
• Bentley Historical Library [Internet]. Teletour – speech clinic. Ann Arbor (IL): University of Michigan; 1950. 21:59 min, sound, black & white. Available from: https://bentley.mivideo.it.umich.edu/media/1_bt3mredx.
   Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Cherney LR, Worrall LE. Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: an international survey of practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):379–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11:CD010820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Hayes S, et al. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3:CD003316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamato TP, Maher CG, Saragiotto BT, et al. How completely are physiotherapy interventions described in reports of randomised trials? Physiotherapy. 2016;102(2):121–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludemann A, Power E, Hoffmann TC. Investigating the adequacy of intervention descriptions in recent speech-language pathology literature: is evidence from randomized trials useable? Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2):443–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose ML, Ali M, Elders A, et al. Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the RELEASE collaboration. Aphasiology. 2018;32(1):183–186.
   Google Scholar
• RELEASE Collaboration. Communicating simply, but not too simply: reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2020;22:302–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M, Blom Johansson M, Isaksen J, et al. Reporting interventions in communication partner training: a critical review and narrative synthesis of the literature. Aphasiology. 2018;32(10):1135–1166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitenstein C, Grewe T, Flöel A, et al. Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting. Lancet. 2017;389(10078):1528–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Dimairo M, Cooper C, et al. Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(9):821–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipper LT, Franklin S, De Aguiar V, et al. An umbrella review of aphasia intervention descriPtion in research: the AsPIRE project. Aphasiology. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1852001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrittain-Ross N, Ross K, Gilmore N, et al. Intensive cognitive communication rehabilitation (ICCR) program for young adults with acquired brain injury. Poster presented at the 94th Annual Conference of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2017 October 23–28; Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore N, Foo L, Kiran S. Intensive cognitive-communication rehabilitation for college-bound young adults with brain injury. Aphasiology. 2018;32(1):70–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ross K, Ross N, Gilmore N, et al. A novel approach to intensive cognitive communication rehabilitation for young adults with acquired brain injury. Poster presented at the International Brain Injury Association’s 12th World Congress on Brain Injury; 2017 March 29 to April 1; New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore N, Ross K, Kiran S. The intensive cognitive-communication rehabilitation program for young adults with acquired brain injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(1S):341–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin K, Stapleton J, Kirkpatrick SI, et al. Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridell M, Edwin S, Von Schreeb J, et al. Health system resilience: what are we talking about? A scoping review mapping characteristics and keywords. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(1):6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briefing notes for research: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research [Internet]. Eastleigh (UK): INVOLVE; 2012 [cited 2021 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/resource-centre/resource-for-researchers/
   Google Scholar
• Stansfield C, Dickson K, Bangpan M. Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):191–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):6–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Medical Res Methodol. 2009;9(1):59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan R. Cochrane consumers and communication review group: data synthesis and analysis. Melbourne (Australia): La Trobe University; 2013. (Narrative data synthesis and analysis).
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N, Whiteside J. Use of life interests and values (LIV) cards for self-determination of aphasia rehabilitation goals. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord. 2012;22(1):6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside J, Pak Hin Kong A. Therapeutic effect of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program. Paper presented at the Clinical Aphasiology Conference; 2013 May; Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover EL, Caplan DN, Waters GS, et al. Communication and quality of life outcomes from an interprofessional intensive, comprehensive, aphasia program (ICAP). Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(2):82–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover EL, Carney A. Integrating the iPad into an intensive, comprehensive aphasia program. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(1):25–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escher AA, Amlani AM, Viani AM, et al. Occupational therapy in an intensive comprehensive aphasia program: performance and satisfaction outcomes. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72(3):7203205110p1–7203205110p7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignam J, Copland D, McKinnon E, et al. Intensive versus distributed aphasia therapy: a nonrandomized, parallel-group, dosage-controlled study. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2206–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez AD, Worrall L, Brown K, et al. Aphasia LIFT: exploratory investigation of an intensive comprehensive aphasia programme. Aphasiology. 2013;27(11):1339–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignam J, Copland D, Rawlings A, et al. The relationship between novel word learning and anomia treatment success in adults with chronic aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 2016;81:186–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley JJ, Craig HK. Influence of rate of treatment on the naming abilities of adults with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 1998;12(11):989–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persad C, Wozniak L, Kostopoulos E. Retrospective analysis of outcomes from two intensive comprehensive aphasia programs. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):388–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdinandi A, Duke W. Intensive comprehensive aphasia treatment: a pilot project for British Columbia and preliminary study. Paper presented at the 3rd Canadian Stroke Congress; 2012 Sept 29 to Oct 2; Calgary, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Code C, Torney A, Gildea-Howardine E, et al. Outcome of a one-month therapy intensive for chronic aphasia: variable individual responses. Semin Speech Lang. 2010;31(1):21–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(1):S225–S239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Off CA, Griffin JR, Murray KW, et al. Interprofessional caregiver education, training, and wellness in the context of a cohort model for aphasia rehabilitation. Top Lang Disord. 2019;39(1):5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winans-Mitrik RL, Hula WD, Dickey MW, et al. Description of an intensive residential aphasia treatment program: rationale, clinical processes, and outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;23(2):S330–S342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald-DeJean D, Rubin SS, Carson RL. An application of the experience sampling method to the study of aphasia: a case report. Aphasiology. 2012;26(2):234–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Worrall L, Cherney LR. Structure, processes, and retrospective outcomes from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):S854–S863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie C. An aphasia group intensive efficacy study. Br J Disord Commun. 1991;26(3):275–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brindley P, Copeland M, Demain C, et al. A comparison of the speech of 10 chronic broca aphasics following intensive and non-intensive periods of therapy. Aphasiology. 1989;3(8):695–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle M, Coelho CA. Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1995;4(4):94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard C, Rochon E, Laird L. Treating naming impairments in aphasia: findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology. 2008;22(9):923–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MF, Saffran EM, Fink RB, et al. Mapping therapy: a treatment programme for agrammatism. Aphasiology. 1994;8(1):19–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J. The mapping hypothesis and aphasia therapy. Aphasiology. 1995;9(6):517–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth A. Using narrative as a bridge: linking language processing models with real-life communication. Semin Speech Lang. 2010;31(1):64–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meinzer M, Djundja D, Barthel G, et al. Long-term stability of improved language functions in chronic aphasia after constraint-induced aphasia therapy. Stroke. 2005;36(7):1462–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson C, Shapiro L. Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology. 2005;19(10–11):1021–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall DL, Oelke M, Brookshire CE, et al. The influence of phonomotor treatment on word retrieval abilities in 26 individuals with chronic aphasia: an open trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58(3):798–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds LA, Nadeau SE, Kiran S. Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) on lexical retrieval of content words in sentences in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(3):402–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson PM, Hirsch FM, Rewega MA. Successful single-word writing treatment: experimental analyses of four cases. Aphasiology. 2002;16(4–6):473–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh JL, Kalinyak-Fliszar MM, West JE, et al. Effects of treatment for sound errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41(4):725–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley JJ, Patterson JP, Carr TH. Differential effects of context- and skill-based treatment approaches: preliminary findings. Aphasiology. 2001;15(5):463–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis GA. PACE revisited. Aphasiology. 2005;19(1):21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapey R, Duchan JF, Elman RJ, et al. Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values for the future. Leader. 2000;5(3):4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Elman R, Bernstein-Ellis E. Aphasia book clubs: making the connection. Stroke Connect. 2006;32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Halper AS, Holland AL, et al. Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(1):19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR. Oral reading for language in aphasia (ORLA): evaluating the efficacy of computer-delivered therapy in chronic nonfluent aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(6):423–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steps Consulting Ltd. StepByStep Aphasia Therapy [Computer Programme]. Acton Turville (UK): Steps Consulting Ltd.; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK, et al. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after closed head injury in young adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47(5):505–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen LR, Lønnberg C. Return to work with aphasia: review of the literature and preliminary vocational outcome of an intensive rehabilitation programme. Paper presented at the 2nd Nordic Aphasia Conference; 2009 May 14–16; Copenhagen, DE.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce JE, O’Halloran R, Menahemi-Falkov M, et al. Comparing higher and lower weekly treatment intensity for chronic aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;31(8):1289–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey SR, Carragher M, Dickey MW, et al. Treatment dose in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic scoping review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020. DOI:10.1080/09602011.2020.1786412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadden B. Aphasia as identity theft: theory and practice. Aphasiology. 2005;19(3–5):211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay J, Parr S, Pound C, et al. Beyond aphasia: therapies for living with communication disability. Bicester (UK): Winslow Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Manning M, MacFarlane A, Hickey A, et al. Perspectives of people with aphasia post-stroke towards personal recovery and living successfully: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0214200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregea S, Brown K. What makes a successful peer-led aphasia support group? Aphasiology. 2013;27(5):581–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotherham A, Howe T, Tillard G. “We just thought that this was Christmas”: perceived benefits of participating in aphasia, stroke, and other groups. Aphasiology. 2015;29(8):965–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbitt EM, Worrall LE, Cherney LR. Clinician perspectives of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):398–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidner K, Lowman J. Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: a systematic review. Perspect ASHA Sigs. 2020;5(1):326–338.
   Google Scholar
• LIFT home: comprehensive aphasia rehabilitation through telerehabilitation [Internet]. Melbourne (Australia): La Trobe University; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.latrobe.edu.au/research/centres/health/aphasia/research/technology
   Google Scholar
• Chadd K, Moyse K, Enderby P. Impact of COVID-19 on the speech and language therapy profession and their patients. Front Neurol. 2021;12:629190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technology and aphasia review [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 24]. Available from: http://www.aphasiafriendly.co/aphasia-and-technology.html
   Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose R, et al. Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(14):1364–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker J, Murray C, Lynch E, et al. Carers’ experiences, needs, and preferences during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(9):1852–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph KA. Logic models. In: Thyer BA, editor. The handbook of social work research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE research methods. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Li DH, Rafferty MR. The implementation research logic model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WK Kellogg Foundation [Internet]. Logic model development guide. Battle Creek (MI): WK Kellogg Foundation; 2004. Available from: https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resources/2004/01/logic-model-development-guide.
   Google Scholar
• Morris R, Morris P. Participants’ experiences of hospital-based peer support groups for stroke patients and carers. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(4):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes R, Fleming P, Henshall L. Peer support groups after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2020;34(7):847–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wobma R, Nijland R, Kwakkel G. Patient characteristics related to the need for peer support in rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e025665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson A, Flood C, Rowe J, et al. Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial to measure the clinical and cost effectiveness of peer support in increasing hope and quality of life in mental health patients discharged from hospital in the UK. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. Framework on integrated, people-centred health services. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 28]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_39-en.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
   Google Scholar
• Aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements: comprehensive supplement to the Australian aphasia rehabilitation pathway [Internet]. St Lucia (Australia): Clinical Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation; 2014 [cited 2020 Jun 22]. Available from: http://www.aphasiapathway.com.au/?name=About-the-statements
   Google Scholar
• Henson DM. An intensive aphasia needs assessment tool [master’s thesis]. Bowling Green (KY): Western Kentucky University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Trebilcock M, Worrall L, Ryan B, et al. Increasing the intensity and comprehensiveness of aphasia services: identification of key factors influencing implementation across six countries. Aphasiology. 2019;33(7):865–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan EAS, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(8):e029954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula W, Cherney L, Worrall L. Setting a research agenda to inform intensive comprehensive aphasia programs. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):409–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauvreau CA, Le Dorze G, Kairy D, et al. Evaluation of a community of practice for speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation: a logic analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar