Perceptions of the Usefulness of Virtual Learning Environments in Accounting Education: A Comparative Evaluation of Undergraduate Accounting Students in Spain and England

References

• Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: an empirical evaluation, MIS Quarterly, 18(2), pp. 159–174. doi: 10.2307/249763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, S. (2001). E-learning developments and experiences, Education and Training, 43(4/5), pp. 240–248. doi: 10.1108/00400910110399247
   Google Scholar
• Anakwe, B. (2008). Comparison of student performance in paper-based versus computer-based testing, Journal of Education for Business, 84(1), pp. 13–17. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.1.13-17
   Google Scholar
• Anitsal, M. M., Anitsal, I., Barger, B., Fidan, I., Allen, M. R. (2008). Student evaluations of course attributes of online courses versus on-ground courses: impact of student personality traits, Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Marketing Studies Proceedings, 13(1), pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Basioudis, I. G., de Lange, P. A. (2009). An assessment of the learning benefits of using a web-based learning environment when teaching accounting, Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 25(1), pp. 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Basioudis, I. G., de Lange, P. A., Suwardy, T., Wells, P. (2012). Accounting students’ perceptions of a learning management system: an international comparison, Accounting Research Journal, 25(2), pp. 72–86. doi: 10.1108/10309611211287279
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain (New York: David McKay).
   Google Scholar
• Braeckman, L., Fieuw, A., Van Bogaert, H. (2008). A web- and case-based learning program for postgraduate students in occupational medicine, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 14(1), pp. 51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off-campus students, Distance Education, 17(1), pp. 44–71. doi: 10.1080/0158791960170105
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, D., Sumrall, D. (2007). E-learning in a multicultural environment using a publicly available internet platform: case study of an USA – Ukraine university partnership, Journal of Global Business Issues, 1(1), pp. 35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Derr, C. B., Gabarro, J. J. (1972). An organizational contingency theory for education, Educational Administration Quarterly, 8(2), pp. 26–43. doi: 10.1177/0013161X7200800203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago, W., Peltier, J. W., Hay, A., Hodgkinson, M. (2005). Dispelling the myths of online education: learning via the information superhighway, Management Research News, 28(7), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1108/01409170510784904
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, J. M. G., Hassall, T. (2009). The changes to accounting education and accounting educators as a result of changes in the Spanish university system: a case study using an institutional theory approach, International Journal of Management Education, 7(3), pp. 13–25. doi: 10.3794/ijme.73.246
   Google Scholar
• Goodnow, W. E. (1982). The contingency theory of education, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 1(4), pp. 341–352. doi: 10.1080/0260137820010404
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, G., Collins, K., Boohan, M., Bickle, I., Stevenson, M. (2009). Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students’ experiences and attitudes, Medical Teacher, 31(1), pp. 6–12. doi: 10.1080/01421590802334317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandzol, J. R. (2004). Teaching MBA statistics online: a pedagogically sound process approach, Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), pp. 237–244. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.79.4.237-244
   Google Scholar
• Greasley, A., Bennett, D., Greasley, K. (2004). A virtual learning environment for operations management: assessing the student's perspective, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(9/10), p. 974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halawi, L., Pires, S., McCarthy, R. (2009). An evaluation of e-learning on the basis of Bloom's taxonomy: an exploratory study, Journal of Education for Business, 84(6), pp. 374–381. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.6.374-380
   Google Scholar
• Hameed, S., Mellor, J., Badii, A., Patel, N., Cullen, A. J. (2007). Factors mediating the routinization of e-learning within a traditional university education environment, International Journal of Electronic Business, 5(2), p. 160 doi: 10.1504/IJEB.2007.012971
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. A. (2005). An exploratory study of learners’ use of a computerised accounting tutorial, Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 23(2), pp. 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, D. E. (2008). Knowledge transfer in online learning environments, Journal of Marketing Education, 30(2), pp. 93 doi: 10.1177/0273475308317702
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N., Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a web-based distance education course: an ethnographic study of participants’ experiences, Information, Communication and Society, 3(4), pp. 557–579. doi: 10.1080/13691180010002297
   Google Scholar
• Henning, P., Schnur, A. (2009). E-learning in continuing medical education: a comparison of knowledge gain and learning efficiency, Journal of Medical Marketing, 9(2), pp. 156–162. doi: 10.1057/jmm.2009.5
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R. (1995). Teaching in a virtual classroom, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), pp. 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hussin, H., Bunyarit, F., Hussin, R. (2009). Instructional design and e-learning: examining learners’ perspective in Malaysian institutions of higher learning, Campus Wide Information System, 26(1), pp. 4–19. doi: 10.1108/10650740910921537
   Google Scholar
• Jalobeanu, M. (2003). The internet in education: the past, the present and, hopefully, the future, in: N. Nistor, S. English and S. Wheeler (Eds) Toward the Virtual University: International Online Learning Perspective, pp. 23–36 (Greenwich: Information Age Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Khazanchi, D. (2005). Information technology (IT) appropriateness: the contingency theory of ‘fit’ and IT implementation in small and medium enterprises, The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), pp. 88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, P. R., Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), pp. 1–47. doi: 10.2307/2391211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenthaler, E. (2005). The choice of technology intelligence methods in multinationals: towards a contingency approach, International Journal of Technology, 32(3/4), pp. 388 doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2005.007341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightner, S., Olson, C. (2001). Offering a globally-linked international accounting course in real-time: a sharing of experiences and lessons learned, Journal of Accounting Education, 19(4), pp. 247–263. doi: 10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00023-9
   Google Scholar
• Love, N., Fry, N. (2006). Accounting students’ perceptions of a virtual learning environment: springboard or safety net?, Accounting Education: An International Journal, 15(2), pp. 151–166. doi: 10.1080/06939280600609201
   Google Scholar
• Maki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M., Whittaker, P. D. (2000). Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32(2), pp. 230–239. doi: 10.3758/BF03207788
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKeough, Z. J. (2009). Emergence of e-learning, The Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 55(1), pp. 69–70. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70071-6
   Google Scholar
• Omoteso, K., Patel, A., Scott, P. (2007). Information and communications technology and organisations: a meta-level perspective, The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 3(3), pp. 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. C. (2009). Using an online homework system to submit accounting homework: role of cognitive need, computer efficacy and perception, Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), pp. 263–268. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.84.5.263-268
   Google Scholar
• Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training, MIS Quarterly, 25(4), pp. 401–426. doi: 10.2307/3250989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, B., Johnston, C. (2006). The effect of interactive on-line learning systems on student learning outcomes in accounting, Journal of Accounting Education, 24(1), pp. 16–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2006.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A., Walsh, R. (2000). Ways to promote participation in the online introductory accounting courses, Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 5(1), pp. 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P., Rice, S., Uddin, M. (2007). Online learning in dentistry: the changes in undergraduate perceptions and attitudes over a four year period, British Dental Journal, 203(7), pp. 419–423. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., King, W. R. (1992). Decision processes for developing strategic applications of information systems: a contingency approach, Decision Sciences, 23(4), pp. 917–943. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1992.tb00426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawaan, A. (2006) Studying the implications of hidden learning styles by tracing learners’ behaviors in an e-learning system, unpublished dissertation, University of Lousville, Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. (2002). Web-enhanced classroom, Journal of Industrial Technology, 18(2), pp. 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E., Duus, H. J. (2001). The power of e-learning in international business education, Journal of Teaching in International Business, 13(2), pp. 55–72. doi: 10.1300/J066v13n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, T., Edwards, P. (2005). Interactive multimedia teaching of accounting information system (AIS) cycles: students’ perceptions and views, Journal of Accounting Education, 23(1), pp. 21–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2005.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Stonebreaker, P. W., Hazeltine, J. E. (2004). Virtual learning effectiveness: an examination of the process, The Learning Organization, 11(2/3), pp. 209–225. doi: 10.1108/09696470410532987
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, J. R., Noser, T. C., Totaro, M. W. (2009). Business faculty and undergraduate students’ perceptions of online learning: a comparative study, Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(1), pp. 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning process, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(2), pp. 149–171. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01281.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volery, T., Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factor in online education, The International Journal of Education Management, 14(5), pp. 216
   Google Scholar
• Wells, P., De Lange, P., Fieger, P. (2008). Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second-year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception, Accounting and Finance, 48(3), pp. 503–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. G. (1996). Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. (2001). Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web (San Diego: The Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• Womble, J. (2008). E-learning: the relationship among learner satisfaction, self-efficacy, and usefulness, The Business Review, 10(1), pp. 182–189.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. (1979). A reappraisal of the contingency approach to organization, Journal of Management Studies, 16(October), pp. 334–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1979.tb00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, J. Z., Dyson, J. R., Powell, P. L. (1996). The impact of information technology on corporate financial reporting: a contingency perspective, The British Accounting Review, 28(3), pp. 203–227. doi: 10.1006/bare.1996.0015
   Google Scholar