Achievement Goal Theory: The Relationship of Accounting Students’ Goal Orientations with Self-efficacy, Anxiety, and Achievement

References

• Abhayawansa, S., & Fonseca, L. (2010). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning – A phenomenographic study of a group of overseas accounting students from Sri Lanka. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 19(5), 527–550. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2010.502651
   Google Scholar
• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantine, J. A., Duff, A., & McCourt Larres, P. (2008). Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Accounting Education, 26, 188–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2009.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L., Finney, S. J., & Geske, J. (2003). A model of statistics performance based on achievement goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 604–616. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729–735. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., Collins, B., & Mclnnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: A simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education: An International Journal, 6(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/096392897331587
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1978.tb03013.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (1999). The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 8(4), 277–300. doi: 10.1080/096392899330801
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: A study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 11(1), 27–42. doi: 10.1080/09639280210153254
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2004). Validation of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST) using accounting students in the United States and Ireland: A research note. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13(4), 449–459. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306792
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2009). An inter-institutional exploration of the learning approaches of students studying accounting. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Cano, F., & Berbén, A. B. G. (2009). University students’ achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 131–153. doi: 10.1348/000709908X314928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., Weinstein, C., & Wicker, F. (2011). Perceived competence and autonomy as moderators of the effects of achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31(4), 393–411. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2011.560597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43–54. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. J. (2004). The enigma of the Chinese learner. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13(3), 289–310. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000273780
   Google Scholar
• Cope, C., & Staehr, L. (2005). Improving students’ learning approaches through intervention in an information systems learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 181–197. doi: 10.1080/03075070500043275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, L. M., Haynes, T. L., Stupnisky, R. H., Perry, R. P., Newall, N. E., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Individual differences in achievement goals: A longitudinal study of cognitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 584–608. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R. A. (2002). Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20(1), 29–44. doi: 10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00025-2
   Google Scholar
• Diseth, Å., & Kobbeltvedt, T. (2010). A mediation analysis of achievement motives, goals, learning strategies, and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 671–687. doi: 10.1348/000709910X492432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2004). Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year-accounting and business economics undergraduates: The role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13(4), 409–430. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306800
   Google Scholar
• Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), 183–214. doi: 10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40, 117–128. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231–254. doi: 10.1007/BF00145015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194. doi: 10.1007/BF00137106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, D. (2003). Preparing for examinations: The interplay of memorising and understanding and the development of knowledge objects. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 19–41. doi: 10.1080/0729436032000056562
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325–345. doi: 10.1007/s10648-004-0003-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., Skinner, D. J., Entwistle, D. M., & Orr, S. M. (2000). Conceptions and beliefs about ‘good teaching’: An integration of contrasting research areas. Higher Education Research and Development, 19(1), 5–26. doi: 10.1080/07294360050020444
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 321–342. doi: 10.1348/000709902320634528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. J., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 33–48. doi: 10.1007/BF03173165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, B., & Wilson, R. (2008). An exploration of the learning approaches of prospective professional accountants in Ireland. Accounting Forum, 32, 225–239. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2008.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Gow, L., Kember, D., & Cooper, B. (1994). The teaching context and approaches to study of accountancy students. Issues in Accounting Education, 9(1), 118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M., Ramsay, A., & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13(4), 489–505. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306837
   Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3301_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316–330. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Predicting success in college: A longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 562–575. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, T. L., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Perry, R. P., & Hladkyj, S. (2008). The effect of attributional retraining on mastery and performance motivation among first-year college students. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 30(3), 198–207. doi: 10.1080/01973530802374972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, G. (2010). It's not always just about the grade: Exploring the achievement goal orientations of pre-med students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 215–245. doi: 10.1080/00220970903352746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, P., Sullivan, J. R., & Guerra, N. S. (2007). A closer look at college students: Self-efficacy and goal orientation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(3), 454–476.
   Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449. doi: 10.1037/a0018947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackling, B. (2005). Perceptions of the learning context and learning approaches: Implications for quality learning outcomes in accounting. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 14(3), 271–291. doi: 10.1080/06939280500036364
   Google Scholar
• Lau, S., Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Task- and self-related pathways to deep learning: The mediating role of achievement goals, classroom attentiveness, and group participation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 639–662. doi: 10.1348/000709907X270261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Pugh, K., Koskey, K. L. K., & Stewart, V. (2012). Developing conceptual understanding of natural selection: The role of interest, efficacy, and basic prior knowledge. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 45–68. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2011.559491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. (2000). Worlds apart: Students’ experiences of learning introductory accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(4), 479–504. doi: 10.1006/cpac.1999.0390
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. (2001). Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: A phenomenographic study. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 10, 161–184. doi: 10.1080/09639280110073443
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2004). Supporting student awareness: Understanding student preconceptions of their subject matter within introductory courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(4), 459–471. doi: 10.1080/1470329042000277039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, U., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2005). Towards a mapping of the student world: The identification of variation in students’ conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting. British Accounting Review, 37(2), 177–204. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning – I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säaljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning – II: Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115–127. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514–523. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). Inducing maximal versus typical learning through the provision of a pretraining goal orientation. Human Performance, 20(3), 205–222. doi: 10.1080/08959280701333016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenovic, R. (2000). An investigation into ways of challenging introductory accounting students’ negative perceptions of accounting. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 9(2), 135–155. doi: 10.1080/09639280010000147
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K., Winne, P., & Edwards, O. (2009). Modern psychometrics for assessing achievement goal orientation: A Rasch analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 547–576. doi: 10.1348/000709908X383472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–53. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple-goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramburuth, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Exploring the relationship between students’ orientations to learning, the structure of students’ learning outcomes and subsequent academic performance. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 13(4), 507–527. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306774
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8(4), 411–427. doi: 10.1007/BF01680529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–47. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senko, C., & Miles, K. M. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 561–583. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, D. S. (1997). Accounting students’ learning conceptions, approaches to learning, and the influence of the learning-teaching context on approaches to learning. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 6(2), 125–146. doi: 10.1080/096392897331532
   Google Scholar
• Shim, S., & Ryan, A. (2005). Changes in self-efficacy, challenge avoidance, and intrinsic value in response to grades: The role of achievement goals. Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 333–349. doi: 10.3200/JEXE.73.4.333-349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanum, S., & Bigatti, S. (2006). Grade expectations: Informed or uninformed optimism, or both? Teaching of Psychology, 33, 14–18. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top3301_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, C., Gomes, D., & Borges, J. (2013). The approaches to studying of Portuguese students of introductory accounting. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 22(2), 193–210. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2013.766426
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991a). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266. doi: 10.1007/BF00132290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991b). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 265–275. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Kerseboom, L., & Imthorn, C. (2000). Test anxiety and metacognitive skillfulness: Availability versus production deficiencies. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 13, 391–412. doi: 10.1080/10615800008248343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02209024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236–250. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajacova, A., Lynch, S. M., & Espenshade, T. J. (2005). Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 677–706. doi: 10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar