Incorporating Nearpod in undergraduate financial accounting classes in Egypt

References

• Atherton, P. (2018). 50 ways to use technology enhanced learning in the classroom: Practical strategies for teaching. 1st ed. UK: Edge Hill University.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, I. (2004). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Educause Research Bulletin, 3, 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., & Willis, P. (2005). Irish secondary students’ perceptions of the work of an accountant and the accounting profession. Accounting Education, 14(4), 367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho-Miñano, M., & Campo, C. D. (2016). Useful interactive teaching tool for learning: Clickers in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 706–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnaghan, C., Edmonds, T. P., Lechner, T. A., & Olds, P. R. (2011). Using student response systems in the accounting classroom: Strengths, strategies and limitations. Journal of Accounting Education, 29(4), 265–283.
   Google Scholar
• Carnaghan, C., & Webb, A. (2007). Investigating the effects of group response systems on student satisfaction, learning and engagement in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, P. L., & Gely, R. (2004). Taking back the law school classroom: Using technology to foster active student learning. Journal of Legal Education, 54(4), 551–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. C., & Snavely, J. C. (2009). Do clickers “click” in the finance classroom? Journal of Financial Education, 35, 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y., Chang, Y., & Chang, C. (2016). Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Hanno, D. M. (1993). An analysis of underlying constructs affecting the choice of accounting as a major. Issues in Accounting Education, 8(2), 219–238.
   Google Scholar
• Conoley, J., Moore, G., Croom, B., & Flowers, J. (2006). A toy or a teaching tool? The use of audience response systems in the classroom. Techniques, 81(7), 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, R. G., & Hsu, M. (2007). The effects of student response systems on performance and satisfaction: An investigation in a tax accounting class. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 4(12), 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, B. M. (2008). Using action research to improve learning and the classroom learning environment. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, D. (2006). Clickers: A new teaching aid with exceptional promise. Astronomy Education Review, 5(1), 70–88.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, T. P. (2005, October). A hands-on demonstration of how to use student response systems in the classroom. Paper presented at the Colloquium on Change in Accounting Education, Long Beach, California.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, C. T., & Edmonds, T. P. (2008). An empirical investigation of the effects of SRS technology on introductory managerial accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(3), 421–434.
   Google Scholar
• Eng, L. L., Lea, B. R., & Cai, R. (2013). Use of clickers for assurance of learning in introductory financial accounting. Advances in Accounting Education, 14, 269–291.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, A., Sauvé, A., Viger, C., & Landry, F. (2016). Nontraditional student withdrawal from undergraduate accounting programmes: A holistic perspective. Accounting Education, 25(5), 437–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., Blayney, P., & Ginns, P. (2006). Anonymity and in class learning: The case for electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 568–580.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C. (2007). On the use of clickers at CU. Retrieved from http://www.iclicker.com/dnn/Portals/0/CUClickerStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kenright, K. (2009). Clickers in the classroom. TechTrends, 53, 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Keough, S. M. (2012). Clickers in the classroom: A review and a replication. Journal of Management Education, 36(6), 822–847.
   Google Scholar
• Kolikant, Y., Drane, D., & Calkins, S. (2010). “Clickers” as catalysts for transformation of teachers. College Teaching, 58(4), 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Kulesza, A., Clawson, M. E., & Ridgway, J. S. (2014). Student success indicators associated with clicker-administered quizzes in an honors introductory Biology course. Journal of College Science Research, 43(4), 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, D. (2007). Using student response pads (“clickers”) in the principles of marketing classroom. In Proceedings of the 2007 ANZMAC Conference. Retrieved from http://www.anzmac.org/conference_archive/2007/papers/D%20Lincoln_1a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Dunning, J. B., Elmore, D., Boide, G. D., Evans, E., … Geddes, B. (2008). Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masikunas, G., Panayiotidis, A., & Burke, L. (2007). The use of electronic voting systems in lectures within business and marketing: A case study of their impact on student learning. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 15(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, S. (2012). Going beyond the numbers in teaching financial accounting: The newsletter as an assignment option. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(4), 1095–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Mula, J. M., & Kavanagh, M. (2009). Click go the students, click-click-click: The efficacy of a student response system for engaging students to improve feedback and performance. e-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 3(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. L., & Hauck, R. V. (2008). Clicking to learn: A case study of embedding radio- frequency based clickers in an introductory management information systems course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Premuroso, R. F., Tong, L., & Beed, T. K. (2011). Does using clickers in the classroom matter to student performance and satisfaction when taking the introductory financial accounting course? Issues in Accounting Education, 26(4), 701–723.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. (2006). Using games and clickers to encourage students to study and participate. Proceedings of the Academy of Educational Leadership, 11, 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Segovia, J. (2008). Personal response system and its effect on student learning. Accounting Instructors’ Report (Winter), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, S. A. J., Brown, M. I., & Draper, S. W. (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: One practitioner’s application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherlin, A. L., Sutherlin, G. R., & Akpanudo, U. M. (2013). The effect of clickers in university science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(5), 651–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietz, W. (2005, October). Using student response systems to more fully engage your students. Paper presented at the Colloquium on change in Accounting Education, Long Beach, California.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, D. J. (2015). Which helps accounting students learn more: Traditional homework, online homework, or clickers? Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19(3), 337–343.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, C. R., & Tao, Y. (2013). How benefits and challenges of personal response system impact students’ continuance intention? A Taiwanese context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yourstone, S. A., Kraye, H. S., & Albaum, G. (2008). Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 75–88.
   Google Scholar