Evolving flipped classroom design in a cost/management accounting module in a rural South African context

References

• Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S., Bridges, M., DiPerro, M., Lovett, M., & Norman, M. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E., & Mouton, J. (2010). The practice of social research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2-22585 (23-26 June).
   Google Scholar
• Bless, C., Higson-Smith, C., & Sithole, S. L. (2017). Fundamentals of social research methods: An African perspective. Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Bob, D. (2002). Postgraduate programs using action research. The Learning Organization, 9(4), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470210428886
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Association for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387724
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, S. M. (2017). Pathway to reform: Developing action research capacity in accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education, 32(3), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-51586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, J. A. (2006). The effects of the elective or required status of courses on student evaluations. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820500507708
   Google Scholar
• Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X., & Taylor, S. (2013). Flipped classroom in first-year management accounting unit – A case study. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference on Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ASCILITE, 2013, 252–256.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, P., & Mestry, R. (2019). Teachers for rural schools – A challenge for South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39ns1a1774
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807309969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, C. P., & Howard, S. (2017). Restructuring the college classroom: A critical reflection on the use of collaborative strategies to target student engagement in higher education. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 16(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717692681
   Google Scholar
• Halawah, I. (2011). Factors influencing college students’ motivation to learn from students’ perspective. Education, 132(2), 379–390.
   Google Scholar
• Harmer, B. M. (2009). Teaching in a contextual vacuum: Lack of prior workplace knowledge as a barrier to sensemaking in the learning and teaching of business courses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802646149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelton, J., & Haigh, M. (2010). Incorporating sustainability into accounting curricula: Lessons learnt from an action research study. Accounting Education, 19(1-2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280802044451
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (2005). What is an authentic learning environment? In A. Herrington, & J. Herrington (Eds.), Authentic learning environments in higher education. Information Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-594-8.ch001
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameel, S. H., & Hamdan, C. A. (2015). Effects of students’ attendance on accounting students’ performance. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(5), 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kasworm, C. (2008). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults (review). The Review of Higher Education, 32(2), 280–281. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajah, M. M., Lindsey, R. V., & Mozer, M. C. (2014). Maximizing students’ retention via spaced review: Practical guidance from computational models of memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinsasser, R. C., & McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 545. https://doi.org/10.2307/328598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. M., & Ma, W. W. K. (2012). Motivational factors for accounting learning –The development of a holistic framework. ICHL:International Conference on Hybrid Learning, August, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32018-7_23
   Google Scholar
• Machemer, P. L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074008
   Google Scholar
• Mason, G., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Inverting (flipping) classrooms – Advantages and challenges. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (23-26 June).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Survey of Student Engagement. (2013). A fresh look at student engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Paisey, C., & Paisey, N. J. (2005). Improving accounting education through the use of action research. Journal of Accounting Education, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2004.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
   Google Scholar
• Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, S., McChlery, S., & Vreken, N. (2006). Teaching styles versus learning styles in the accounting sciences in the United Kingdom and South Africa: A comparative analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 14(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200600015
   Google Scholar
• White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Rangachari, P. K., Short, J. L., Exintaris, B., Malone, D. T., Davie, B., Eise, N., Mc Namara, K., & Naidu, S. (2016). Adopting an active learning approach to teaching in a research-intensive higher education context transformed staff teaching attitudes and behaviours. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(3), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1107887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B., Horner, C., & Allen, S. (2019). Flipped vs traditional teaching perspectives in a first year accounting unit: An action research study. Accounting Education, 28(4), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1609536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar