The contribution of pragmatism to understanding educational action research: value and consequences

References

• Antonio, R. 1991. “Postmodern Storytelling versus Pragmatic Truth-Seeking: The Discursive Bases of Social Theory.” Sociological Theory 9 (2): 154–163.10.2307/202076
   Google Scholar
• Badley, G. 2003. “The Crisis in Educational Research: A Pragmatic Approach.” European Educational Research Journal 2 (2): 295–308.10.2304/eerj
   Google Scholar
• Baert, P. 2005. Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R. 2004. “Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems: Making IS Research Relevant to Practice.” MIS Quarterly 28 (3): 329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2010. “Why ‘What Works’ Still won’t Work. From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 29 (5): 491–503.10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and N. Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and Educational Research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., and S. K. Biklen. 1998. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. New York: Pearson Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Boog, B. 2003. “The Emancipatory Character of Action Research, Its History and the Present State of the Art.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 13 (6): 426–438.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., D. Greenwood, and P. Maguire. 2003. “Why Action Research?” Action Research 1 (1): 9–28.10.1177/14767503030011002
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., and P. Maguire. 2009. “Participatory Action Research: Contributions to the Development of Practitioner Inquiry in Education.” Educational Action Research 17(1): 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, W. and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical. Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Lewes: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, L., and N. Ward. 2007. Generating Change through Research: Action Research and Its Implications. Newcastle: University of Newcastle, Centre for Rural Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Cherryholmes, C. 1992. “Notes on Pragmatism and Scientific Realism.” Educational Researcher 21 (6): 13–17.10.3102/0013189X021006013
   Google Scholar
• Cherryholmes, C. 1994. “More Notes on Pragmatism.” Educational Researcher 23 (1): 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. 6th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Damico, A. 1981. “Dewey and Marx: On Partisanship and the Reconstruction of Society.” The American Political Science Review 75 (3): 654–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, D. and N. Kock. 2007 ““Publishing Information Systems Action Research for a Positivist Audience.” Communications of AIS 19 (10). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol19/iss1/10/
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1910. How We Think. London: D. C. Heath & Company. http://archive.org/details/howwethink000838mbp
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1916] 1947. Democracy and Education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1920] 1982. “Reconstruction in Philosophy.” In John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, vol. 12, edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1922] 2007. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York, NY: Cosimo.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1931] 1982. “The Development of American Pragmatism.” In Pragmatism, the Classic Writings, edited by H. S. Thayer. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. [1938] 1963. Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1983. Pragmatism and Sociology. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. 2005. “Researching Thinking Skills Strategies in a Primary School: Challenging Technical-Rationalist Orthodoxies of Learning?” Educational Action Research 13 (2): 213–236.10.1080/09650790500200285
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1991. Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2005. “Becoming Critical: The Failure to Connect.” Educational Action Research 13 (3): 359–374.10.1080/09650790500200317
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2006. “Educational Research as a Form of Democratic Rationality.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (2): 169–185.10.1111/jope.2006.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2007. “Assessing the Quality of Action Research.” Research Papers in Education 22 (2): 229–246.10.1080/02671520701296205
   Google Scholar
• Fendt, J., and R. Kaminska-Labbéc. 2011. “Relevance and Creativity through Design-Driven Action Research: Introducing Pragmatic Adequacy.” European Management Journal 29 (3): 217–233.10.1016/j.emj.2010.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1974. “The Adult Literacy Process as Cultural Action for Freedom.” Harvard Educational Review 40 (2): 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Freytes Frey, A., and C. Cross. 2011. “Overcoming Poor Youth Stigmatization and Invisibility through Art: A Participatory Action Research Experience in Greater Buenos Aires.” Action Research 9 (1): 65–82.10.1177/1476750310396951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillberg, C. 2012. “A Methodological Interpretation of Feminist Pragmatism.” In Contemporary Feminist Pragmatism, edited by M. Hamington and C. Bardwell-Jones, 217–237. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. 1992. Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkuhl, G. 2012. “Pragmatism Vs Interpretivism in Qualitative Information Systems Research.” European Journal of Information Systems 21 (2): 135–146.10.1057/ejis.2011.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. 2007. “Pragmatic Action Research.” International Journal of Action Research 3 (1/2): 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 2004. “Action Research: A Contradiction in Terms?” Oxford Review of Education 30 (2): 165–181.10.1080/0305498042000215502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hase, S. 2004. “Action Research in the Workplace, Pedagogy or Pragmatism? That is the Question.” Paper presented at a symposium held for the Work and Learning Network Conference, University of Alberta, Canada, October.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. [1820] 2001. Philosophy of Right. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, H., R. Huttunen, L. Syrjälä, and J. Pesonen. 2012. “Action Research and Narrative Inquiry: Five Principles for Validation Revisited.” Educational Action Research 20 (1): 5–21.10.1080/09650792.2012.647635
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, H., L. Kakkori, and R. Huttunen. 2001. “This is My Truth, Tell Me Yours: Some Aspects of Action Research Quality in the Light of Truth Theories.” Educational Action Research 9 (1): 9–24.10.1080/09650790100200142
   Google Scholar
• James, W. [1904] 2007. What is Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Minneapolis, MN: Filiquarian Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, L., and A. Graham. 1996. “Postmodern Perspectives and Action Research: Reflecting on the Possibilities.” Educational Action Research 4 (2): 267–278.10.1080/0965079960040208
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. 1994. “Is Action Research a ‘Natural’ Process for Teachers?” Educational Action Research 2 (1): 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1982. The Action Research Planner. Geelong, VIC: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N., R. McQueen, and J. Scott. 1997. “Can Action Research Be Made More Rigorous in a Positivist Sense? The Contribution of an Iterative Approach.” Journal of Systems and Information Technology 1 (1): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, P. 1996. “Improving Practice through Reflective Enquiry: Confessions of a First‐Time Action Researcher.” Educational Action Research 4 (3): 349–361.10.1080/0965079960040305
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V. [1908] 1948. Materialism and Empirio-Criticism: Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• L’Etang, S., and L. Theron. 2012. “A Critical Reflection on the Participatory Action Process Involved in the Development of a Cognitive-Behavioural-Based Counselling Intervention Programme for Youth Living with HIV/AIDS in a Rural South African Town.” Action Research 10 (1): 5–21.10.1177/1476750311414740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M., and D. Greenwood. 2001. “Pragmatic Action Research and the Struggle to Transform Universities into Learning Communities.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 103–113. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marrow, A. 1969. The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. [1845] 1969. “Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy.” In Marx/Engels Selected Works, Volume One, edited by S. Sathush, 13–15. Moscow, USSR: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, T. 1984. “Translator’s Introduction.” In The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, by J. Habermas, v–xxxvii. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCutcheon, G., and B. Jung. 1990. “Alternative Perspectives on Action Research.” Theory into Practice 29 (3): 144–151.10.1080/00405849009543447
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. 2002. Action Research: Principles and Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2010. You and Your Own Action Research Project. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, J. 1981. Teachers’ Guide to Action Research. London: Grant McIntyre.
   Google Scholar
• Oquist, P. 1978. “The Epistemology of Action Research.” Acta Sociologica 21 (2): 143–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. 1878. “Illustration of the Logic of Science: Second Paper. – How to Make Our Ideas Clear.”Popular Science Monthly, January, 286–302. http://archive.org/details/popularsciencemo12newy
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M., and V. Robinson. 1984. “The Origins and Status of Action Research.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 20 (2): 113–124.10.1177/002188638402000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovic, J. 1998. “Dewey is a Philistine and Other Grave Misreadings.” Oxford Review of Education 24 (4): 513–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, K. 2005. Introduction to Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. 2003. “Pragmatist Philosophy and Action Research: Readings and Conversation with Richard Rorty.” Action Research 1 (1): 103–123.10.1177/14767503030011007
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. 2006. “A Response to J. A. McKernan.” Journal of Management Inquiry 15 (2): 207–208.10.1177/1056492606288076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. 2001. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J., I. Convery, E. Simmons, and A. Weatherall. 2012. “What Does It Mean to Be a Friendly Outsider? Critical Reflection on Finding a Role as an Action Researcher with Communities Developing Renewable Energy Projects.” Educational Action Research 20 (2): 201–218.10.1080/09650792.2012.676286
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2000. “The Decline of Redemptive Truth and the Rise of a Literary Culture.” http://www.stanford.edu/~rrorty/decline.htm
   Google Scholar
• Russell, B. [1938] 2004. Power: A New Social Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. 1995. John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Soler, J., and L. Miller. 2003. “The Struggle for Early Childhood Curricula: A Comparison of the English Foundation Stage Curriculum, Te Whäriki and Reggio Emilia.” International Journal of Early Years Education 11 (1): 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. 2006. Action Research: A Methodology for Change and Development. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taatila, V., and K. Raij. 2012. “Philosophical Review of Pragmatism as a Basis for Learning by Developing Pedagogy.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (8): 831–844.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, T. 2013. Action Research: The Challenges of Understanding and Researching Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L., and M. Cole. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, D. 2010. “Uncovering Hegelian Connections: A New Look at Dewey’s Early Educational Ideas.” Education and Culture 26 (1): Article 6. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/eandc/vol26/iss1/art6
   Google Scholar
• Waters‐Adams, S. 1994. “Collaboration and Action Research: A Cautionary Tale.” Educational Action Research 2 (2): 195–210.10.1080/0965079940020205
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. 1989. “Creating a Living Educational Theory from Questions of the Kind, ‘How Do I Improve My Practice?’” Cambridge Journal of Education 19 (1): 41–52.10.1080/0305764890190106
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, M. 2012. Dewey’s ‘Democracy without Politics’: On the Failures of Liberalism and the Frustrations of Experimentalism. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R. 1989. Learning from Experience: Principles and Practice in Action Research. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar