Collaboration between academics and teachers: a complex relationship

References

• Admiraal, W., and T. Wubbels. 2005. “Multiple Voices, Multiple Realities, What Truth? Student Teachers’ Learning to Reflect in Different Paradigms.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 11 (3): 315–329.
   Google Scholar
• Banegas, D., A. Pavese, A. Velázquez, and S. M. Vélez. 2013. “Teacher Professional Development through Collaborative Action Research: Impact on Foreign English-Language Teaching and Learning.” Educational Action Research 21 (2): 185–201.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, S. C., J. Jordan, and E. Perry. 2011. “Reflecting on Professional Development.” Educational Action Research 19 (3): 399–411.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., and R. Putnam. 1998. “Professional Development and Reform-Based Teaching:Introduction to the Theme Issue.” Teaching and Teacher Education 14 (1): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., H. Novak Lauscher, S. Jarvis-Selinger, and B. Beckingham. 2004. “Collaboration and Self-Regulation in Teachers’ Professional Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (5): 435–455.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1993. Inside/outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., M. Bell, B. Rundell, and D. Evans. 2003. “The Impact of Collaborative CPD on Classroom Teaching and Learning.” In Research Evidence in Education Library. Version 1.1. London: EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, M. W. 2012. “In Pursuit of Reciprocity: Researchers, Teachers, and School Reformers Engaged in Collaborative Analysis of Video Records.” Theory into Practice 51 (2): 91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., and A. Townsend. 2007. “Ethical Issues for Consultants in Complex Collaborative Action Research Settings: Tensions and Dilemmas.” In An Ethical Approach to Practitioner Research: Dealing with Issues and Dilemmas in Action Research, edited by A. Campbell and S. Groundwater-Smith, 42–62. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment. 2000. Professional Development: Support for Teaching and Learning. February. London: DfEE.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. 2004. Reflective Practice in Action: 80 Reflection Breaks for Busy Teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M., and L. Cook. 1992. Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals. WhitePlains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J. M., and A. D. Gitlin. 2004. “[Re]Visioning the Academic-Teacher Divide: Power and Knowledge in the Educational Community.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 10 (1): 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. L. 2001. “I Wish This Were a Poem of Practices of Participatory Research.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 171–178. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, S. H., S. Gunter, S. Montgomery, C. Shelton, and D. West. 2001. “Technology Integration and the Classroom Learning Environment: Research for Action.” Learning Environments Research 4 (3): 259–286.
   Google Scholar
• Kamini, J., and C. Figg. 2011. “Collaborative Action Research Approaches Promoting Professional Development for Elementary School Teachers.” Educational Action Research 19 (1): 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, R., and C. Day. 2000. “Action Research and Reflective Practice: Towards a Holistic View.” Educational Action Research 8 (1): 179–193.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Pastor, V. M., R. Monjas, and J. C. Manrique. 2011. “Fifteen Years of Action Research as Professional Development: Seeking More Collaborative, Useful and Democratic Systems for Teachers.” Educational Action Research 19 (2): 153–170.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, C. 2007. “School-University Partnerships for Educational Research – Distinctions, Dilemmas and Challenges.” Curriculum Journal 18 (3): 327–341.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2006. All You Need to Know about Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meirink, J. A., J. Imants, P. C. Meijer, and N. Verloop. 2010. “Teacher Learning and Collaboration in Innovative Teams.” Cambridge Journal of Education 40 (2): 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, K. 2011. “How Far down Can You Go? Can You Get Reincarnated as a Floorboard? Religious Education Pedagogy, Pupil Motivation and Teacher Intelligence.” Educational Action Research 16 (3): 361–376.
   Google Scholar
• Otienoh, R. O. 2009. “Reflective Practice: The Challenge of Journal Writing.” Reflective Practice 10 (4): 477–489.
   Google Scholar
• Platteel, T., H. Hulshof, P. Ponte, J. Van Driel, and N. Verloop. 2010. “Forming a Collaborative Action Research Partnership.” Educational Action Research 18 (4): 429–451.
   Google Scholar
• Ponte, P., J. Ax, D. Beijaard, and T. Wubbels. 2004. “Teachers’ Development of Professional Knowledge through Action Research and the Facilitation of This by Teacher Educators.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (5): 571–588.
   Google Scholar
• Rearick, M. L., and A. Feldman. 1999. “Orientations, Purposes and Reflection: A Framework for Understanding Action Research.” Teaching and Teacher Education 15 (4): 333–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., D. Ross, and A. Adams. 2008. “A Review of Research on the Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice and Student Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (1): 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar