Publication Cover
Educational Action Research
Connecting Research and Practice for Professionals and Communities
Volume 23, 2015 - Issue 3
573
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘What If? As If’, an approach to action research practice: becoming-different in school-age childcare

Pages 350-365 | Received 01 Jul 2014, Accepted 23 Dec 2014, Published online: 11 Apr 2015

References

  • Amorim, A. C., and C. Ryan. 2005. “Deleuze, Action Research and Rhizomatic Growth.” Educational Action Research 13 (4): 581–594. doi:10.1080/09650790500200306.
  • Carr, W. 2009. “Practice without Theory? A Postmodern Perspective on Educational Practice.” In Understanding and Researching Professional Practice, edited by Bill Green, 55–64. Rotterdam: Sense.
  • Clarke, B., and J. Parsons. 2013. “Becoming Rhizome Researchers.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 4 (1): 35–43.
  • Coghlan, D., and T. Brannick. 2005. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London: Sage.
  • Davies, B. 2010. “The Implications for Qualitative Research Methodology of the Struggle between the Individualised Subject of Phenomenology and the Emergent Multiplicities of the Poststructuralist Subject: The Problem of Agency.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 1 (1): 54–68.
  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. [1980] 2004. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
  • DePalma, R., and L. Teague. 2008. “A Democratic Community of Practice: Unpicking All Those Words.” Educational Action Research 16 (4): 441–456. doi:10.1080/09650790802445619.
  • Drummond, J. S., and M. Themessl-Huber. 2010. “The Cyclical Process of Action Research: The Contribution of Gilles Deleuze.” Action Research 5 (4): 430–448. doi:10.1177/1476750307077317.
  • Eliasson, T. 2010. “Att bli tagen på allvar [To Be Taken Seriously].” http://www.tryggaremanskligare.goteborg.se/pdf/publikation/attblitagenpaallvar.pdf.
  • Else, P. 2008. “Playing: The Space between.” In Foundations of Playwork, edited by F. Brown and C. Taylor, 79–83. Maidenhead: Open University Press, McGraw Hill.
  • Gale, K., B. Turner, and L. McKenzie. 2013. “Action Research, Becoming and the Assemblage: A Deleuzian Reconceptualisation of Professional Practice.” Educational Action Research 21 (4): 549–564. doi:10.1080/09650792.2013.832344.
  • Garvey, C. 1977. Play. The Developing Child. London: Harvard University Press.
  • Grant, S., and M. Humphries. 2006. “Critical Evaluation of Appreciative Inquiry: Bridging an Apparent Paradox.” Action Research 4 (4): 401–418. doi:10.1177/1476750306070103.
  • Guilbaud, S. 2003. “The Essence of Play.” In Playwork. Theory and Practice, edited by F. Brown, 9–17. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Harker, C. 2005. “Playing and Affective Time-spaces.” Children’s Geographies 3 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1080/14733280500037182.
  • Henry Smith, H. 2010. “Children’s Empowerment, Play and Informal Learning in Two After School Provisions.” PhD diss., Middlesex University.
  • Heron, J., and P. Reason. 2001. “The Practice of Co-operative Inquiry: Research ‘With’ rather than ‘On’ People.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 179–188. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hughes, B. 2006. PlayTypes: Speculations and Possibilities. London: London Centre for Playwork Education and Training.
  • Jackson, A. Y. 2013. “Data-as-machine: A Deleuzian Becoming.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 111–124. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Jackson, A. Y., and L. A. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research. Viewing Data across Multiple Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Johansson, B. 2012. “Doing Adulthood in Childhood Research.” Childhood 19 (1): 101–114. doi:10.1177/0907568211408362.
  • Kane, E., and P. Petrie. 2014. “Becoming-player in School-age Childcare.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methods 5 (1): 18–31. doi:org/10.7577/rerm.947.
  • Katsarou, E. 2014. “Critical Action Research and the Challenge of Postmodernism.” In Action Research, Innovation and Change. International Perspectives across Disciplines, edited by T. Stern, A. Townsend, F. Rauch, and A. Schuster, 191–201. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Kemmis, S. 2006. “Participatory Action Research and the Public Sphere.” Educational Action Research 14 (4): 459–476.10.1080/09650790600975593
  • Kemmis, S. 2009. “Action Research as a Practice Based Practice.” Educational Action Research 17 (3): 463–474. doi:10.1080/09650790903093284.
  • Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2005. “Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 3rd ed., 559–603. London: Sage.
  • Klerfelt, A. 1999. “Fritidshem och skola – olika miljöer för lärande [Leisure-time Centres and Schools – Different Learning Environments].” In Miljöer för lärande [Environments for Learning], edited by I. Carlgren, 79–101. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Law, J. 2004. After Method. Mess in Social Science Research. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Leafgren, S. L. 2009. Reuben’s Fall: A Rhizomatic Analysis of Disobedience in Kindergarten. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Lester, S. 2012. “Vibrant Spaces: Re-configuring Adults ‘Providing Play’.” Paper presented at International Council on Children’s Play 26th World Play Conference, Tallinn, June 18–19. http://www.iccp-play.org/resourcestallinn2012.htm
  • Lester, S. 2013a. “Rethinking Children’s Participation in Democratic Processes: A Right to Play.” In Youth Engagement: The Civic-political Lives of Children and Youth (Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, Volume 16), edited by S. Kawecka Nenga and J. K. Taft, 21–43. Bingley: Emerald Group.10.1108/ssch
  • Lester, S. 2013b. “Playing in a Deleuzian Playground.” In The Philosophy of Play, edited by E. Ryall, W. Russell, and M. MacLean, 130–140. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Ludema, J. D., D. L. Cooperrider, and F. J. Barrett. 2001. “Appreciative Inquiry: The Power of the Unconditional Positive Question.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 189–199. London: Sage.
  • Masny, D. 2013. “Rhizoanalytic Pathways in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 19 (5): 339–348. doi:10.1177/1077800413479559.
  • Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual. Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822383574
  • Mill, J. E., and H. M. Morris. 2000. “The Ambivalence of Ownership: Nursing Graduate Students as Collaborators in Action Research.” Educational Action Research 8 (1): 137–149. doi:10.1080/09650790000200110.
  • Olsson, L. M. 2009. Movement and Experimentation in Young Children’s Learning. Deleuze and Guattari in Early Childhood Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Rogers, P. J., and D. Fraser. 2003. “Appreciating Appreciative Inquiry.” In Using Appreciative Inquiry in Evaluation, edited by H. S. Preskill and A. T. Coghlan, 75–84. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Swedish National Agency for Education. 2011. “Curriculum for the Compulsory School, Preschool Class and the Recreation Centre.” http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/andra-sprak-och-lattlast/in-english/publications
  • Swedish National Agency for Education. 2012. “General Guidelines and Comments for Quality Reporting.” http://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/kvalitetsarbete/i-praktiken
  • Swedish National Agency for Education. 2014. “Allmänna Råd för Fritidshem [General Guidelines for Leisure-time Centres].” http://www.skolverket.se/om-skolverket/publikationer/visa-enskild-publikation?_xurl_=http%3A%2F%2Fwww5.skolverket.se%2Fwtpub%2Fws%2Fskolbok%2Fwpubext%2Ftrycksak%2FRecord%3Fk%3D3301
  • Torbert, William R. 2001. “The Practice of Action Inquiry.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 250–260. London: Sage.
  • Von Wright, M. 2009. Initiativ och följsamhet i klassrummet. En studie i de pedagogiska villkoren för elevers inflytande, delaktighet och välbefinnande [Initiative and Compliance in the Classroom. An Inquiry into the Pedagogical Conditions for Student Influence, Participation and Well-being]. Örebro: Rapporter i Pedagogik, 15, Örebro University.
  • Williams, J. 2013. Gilles Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition. A Critical Introduction and Guide. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.