Extending classrooms through teacher collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments

References

• Annetta, L.A., E. Folta, and M. Klesath. 2010. V-Learning. Distance Education in the 21st Century through 3D Virtual Learning Environments. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aspfors, J., M. Pörn, L. Forsman, P. Salo, and G. Karlberg-Granlund. 2015. “The Researcher as a Negotiator – Exploring Collaborative Professional Development Projects with Teachers.” Education Inquiry 6 (4): 1–16. doi:10.3402/edui.v6.27045.
   Google Scholar
• Bergold, J., and S. Thomas. 2012. “Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13 (1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3334
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. Seventh Edition. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derboven, J., D. Geerts, and D. De Grooff. 2017. “Appropriating Virtual Learning Environments: A Study of Teacher Tactics.” Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 40: 20–35. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, J. 2009. “Changes and Challenges: Key Issues for Scottish Rural Schools and Communities.” International Journal of Educational Research 48: 129–139. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, R.J., M. Adair, P. Broomhead, S. Gray, S. Grierson, S. Hendrickson, A.P. Jensen, et al. 2011. “Seeking Renewal, Finding Community: Participatory Action Research in Teacher Education.” Teacher Development 15: 1–18. doi:10.1080/13664530.2011.555221.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Fourth Edition. London: SAGE Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Gouseti, A. 2013. “An Overview of Web-based School Collaboration: a History of Success or Failure?” Cambridge Journal of Education 43: 377–390. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.792785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity. 2013. Responsible Conduct of Research and Procedures for Handling Allegations of Misconduct in Finland. Helsinki: The Ministry of Education and Culture in Finland. http://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. 2012. Learning Theory and Online Technologies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, L.M. 2009. “Respect and Responsibility: Review of Research on Small Rural Schools in England.” International Journal of Educational Research 48: 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hilli, C. 2016. “Virtual Learning at a Distance: an Interview Study of Finnish Upper Secondary School Students.” Doctoral thesis, Åbo Akademi University: Åbo Akademis förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hilli, C. 2018. “Distance Teaching in Small Rural Primary Schools: a Participatory Action Research Project.” Educational Action Research 1–15. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1526695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesen, M. 2013. “The Role of Virtual Learning Environments in a Primary School Context: an Analysis of Inscription of Assessment Practices.” British Journal of Education Technology 44 (2): 302–313. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01296.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesen, M., O. Erstad, and L. Habib. 2012. “Virtual Learning Environments as Sociomaterial Agents in the Network of Teaching Practice.” Computers & Education 59: 785–792. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaoja, E., and J. Pietarinen. 2009. “Small Rural Primary Schools in Finland: A Pedagogically Valuable Part of the School Network.” International Journal of Educational Research 48: 109–116. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Karlberg-Granlund, G. 2009. “Att förstå det stora i det lilla. Byskolan som pedagogik, kultur och struktur.” Doctoral thesis, Åbo Akademi University: Åbo Akademis förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. 2010. “What Is Professional Practice? Recognizing and Respecting Diversity in Understandings of Practice.” In Elaborating Professionalism: Studies in Practice and Theory, edited by C. Kanes, 139–165. Vol. 5. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., R. Nixon, and R. McTaggart. 2014. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kindon, S., R. Pain, and M. Kesby. 2010. “Participatory Action Research. Origins, Approaches and Methods.” In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. Connecting People, Participation and Place, edited by S. Kindon, R. Pain, and M. Kesby, 9–18. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lag om grundläggande utbildning, 1998/628. Accessed 2 May 2018. https://www.finlex.fi/sv/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980628#L4P9
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. 2012. “Critical Reflections on the Benefits of ICT in Education.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (1): 9–24. doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.577938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, T. 2008. “Action Research through Dialogue Conferences.” In Nurturing Praxis. Action Research in Partnerships between School and University in a Nordic Light, edited by K. Rönnerman, E.M. Furu, and P. Salo, 172–192. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, K., S. Kemmis, S. Francisco, and A. Lloyd. 2017. “Introduction: Practice Theory and Theory of Practice Architectures.” In Exploring Education and Professional Practice, edited by K. Mahon, S. Francisco, and S. Kemmis, 1–30. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L.C., and N. Brightbill. 2010. “Toward a Participatory Ethics.” In Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. Connecting People, Participation and Place, edited by S. Kindon, R. Pain, and M. Kesby, 31–40. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B., and E.J. Tisdell. 2016. Qualitative Research. A Guide to Design and Implementation. Fourth Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., M.A. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D., and S. Strohmeier. 2011. “Design Characteristics of Virtual Learning Environments: State of Research.” Computers & Education 57: 2505–2516. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, S. 2009. Forskningscirklar – en vägledning: en metodbok. Malmö: Resurscentrum för mångfaldens skola.
   Google Scholar
• Raggl, A. 2015. “Teaching and Learning in Small Rural Primary Schools in Austria and Switzerland—Opportunities and Challenges from Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives.” International Journal of Educational Research 74: 127–135. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdardottir, I., and A.-M. Puroila. 2018. “Encounters in the Third Space: Constructing the Researcher’s Role in Collaborative Action Research.” Educational Action Research 1–15. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1507832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonsmann, G. 2014. “A Study of the Effectiveness of Blackboard Collaborate for Conducting Synchronous Courses at Multiple Locations.” InSight. A Journal of Scholarly Teaching 9: 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., R. Sundqvist, and A.-S. Smeds-Nylund. 2016. “Educational Leadership for Sustained Multi-level School Development in Finland – A Non-affirmative Approach.” Nordic Studies in Education 36 (2): 103–124. doi:10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-03.
   Google Scholar
• Utbildningsstyrelsen. 2014. Grunderna för läroplanen för den grundläggande utbildningen 2014: Föreskrifter och anvisningar 2014:96. Helsinki: Finnish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J.M., and N. Schäpke. 2014. “Action, Research and Participation: Roles of Researchers in Sustainability Transitions.” Sustainability Science 9 (4): 483–496. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar