Reflective writing followed by dialogue improves supervision practices and cooperation in midwifery education

References

• Arendt, H. 1978. The Life of the Mind: One/Thinking. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Attard, K. 2012. “The Role of Narrative Writing in Improving Professional Practice.” Educational Action Research 20 (1):161–175. doi:10.1080/09650792.2012.647754.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The Dialogical Imagination, edited by C. Holquist, 269–360.Austin and London:University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. 1998. Spørsmålet Om Talegenrane [The Problem of Speech Genres]. Translated with an epilogue by R. T. Slaattelid. Bergen: Ariadne Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. 2010. Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.T., M.K. Kirkpatrick, D. Mangum, and J. Avery. 2008. “A Review of Narrative Pedagogy Strategies to Transform Traditional Nursing Education.” Journal of Nursing Education 47 (6): 283–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choucri, L. 2005. “Creating Change: Developing a Midwifery Action Research Project.” British Journal of Midwifery 13 (10): 628–632. doi:10.12968/bjom.2005.13.10.19837.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D.J. 2007. Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. 1985. “The Zone of Proximal Development: Where Culture and Cognition Create Each Other.” In Culture, Communication and Cognition, edited by J. Wertsch, 146–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R., L. Raffier, P. Rogan, and L. Schleicher. 1998. “Interactive Group Journals: Learning as a Dialogue among Learners.” TESOL Quarterly 32 (3): 556–568. doi:10.2307/3588126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collington, V., and S. Hunt. 2006. “Reflection in Midwifery Education and Practice: An Exploratory Analysis.” Evidence Based Midwifery 4 (3): 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F.M., and D.J. Clandinin. 1990. “Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 19 (5): 2–14. doi:10.3102/0013189x0190050.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Choosing among Five Traditions. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Deery, R., and D. Hughes. 2004. “Supporting Midwife-led Care through Action Research: A Tale of Mess, Muddle and Birth Balls.” Evidence Based Midwifery 2 (2): 52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 2002. “The Learning Potential of a Web-mediated Discussion in a University Course.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (3): 339–352. doi:10.1080/03075070220000716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., F. Hertzberg, and T. Løkengard Hoel. 2010. Skrive for Å Lære. Skriving I Høyere Utdanning [Write to Learn. Writing in Higher Education]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag AS. doi:10.1080/03075070220000716.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, M., and M. Levin. 1993. “Cogenerative Learning. Bringing Participation into Action Research.” In Participatory Action Research, edited by W.F. Whyte, 127–142. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D. 1995. “The Reflective Journal: A Window to Preservice Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Teaching and Teacher Education 11 (3): 229–241. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)00031-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G. Anderson. 2005. The Action Research Dissertation. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives. 2014. Code of Ethics for Midwives. The Hague: Author. Accessed 9 Oct 2019. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2019/10/eng-international-code-of-ethics-for-midwives.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning - Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindseth, A., and A. Nordberg. 2004. “A Phenomenological Hermeneutical Method for Researching Lived Experience.” Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 18 (2): 145–153. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, J. 2014. Writing and Doing Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. 1994. “Participatory Action Research: Issues in Theory and Practice.” Educational Action Research 2 (3): 313–337. doi:10.1080/0965079940020302.
   Google Scholar
• Nakielski, K.P. 2005. “The Reflective Practitioner.” In Decision Making in Midwifery Practice, edited by M.D. Raynor, J.E. Marshall, and A. Sullivan, 143–156. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, L., and C. Webb. 2006. “What Makes a Good Midwife? an Integrative Review of Methodologically-Diverse Research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 56 (4): 414–429. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04026.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pushor, D., and D.J. Clandinin. 2009. “The Interconnections between Narrative Inquiry and Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke and B. Somekh, 290–300. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ralston, R. 2005. “Supervision of Midwifery: A Vehicle for Introducing Reflective Practice.” British Journal of Midwifery 13 (12): 792–796. doi:10.12968/bjom.2005.13.12.20127.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1976. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: Texas University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1977. “The Question of Proof in Freud’s Psychoanalytic Writings.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 25 (4): 835–871. doi:10.1177/000306517702500404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. 2000. The Enquiring University Teacher. Maidenhead: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D.A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Schribner and E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1987. “Thinking and Speech.” In The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1, Problems of General Psychology N. Minick, Trans, edited by R.W. Rieber and A.S. Carton, 39–285. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wennergren, A.-C., and K. Rönnerman. 2006. “The Relation between Tools Used in Action Research and the Zone of Proximal Development.” Educational Action Research 14 (4): 547–568. doi:10.1080/09650790600975791.
   Google Scholar