Examining the role of market learning in innovation-based dual performance in social purpose organizations (SPOs)

References

• Ahmad, F., Widen, G., & Huvila, I. (2020). The impact of workplace information literacy on organizational innovation: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, E. J., & Nagle, F. (2020). Accelerating innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(4), 24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2021). Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Science, 67(9), 5399–5429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (1998). Do universities that are more market orientated perform better? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559810199898
   Google Scholar
• Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R., & Norman, W. (2012). Defining social innovation. A deliverable of the project: The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe. DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ciampi, F., Demi, S., Magrini, A., Marzi, G., & Papa, A. (2021). Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coral, C., & Garcia Rodriguez, L. (2016). Increasing societal impact in social enterprises: Lessons from a B Corp multiple-case study .School of Economics and Management, Lund University. 2023, August 27. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8875806&fileOId=8875807
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C ., (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure “change” – or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. http://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case/files/dees-SE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G. (2017). The meaning of social entrepreneurship - case studies in social entrepreneurship and sustainability. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Defee, C. C., & Fugate, B. S. (2010). Changing perspective of capabilities in the dynamic supply chain era. The international journal of logistics management, 21(2), 180–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574091011071915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhakal, H. R. (2020). How social enterprises called benefit organisations fulfil the triple bottom line. Social Business, 10(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1362/204440820X15813359568228
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, P. R. (1992). Toward a general theory of competitive rationality. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dorado, S. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different process of creations, no? Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946706000453
   Google Scholar
• Duque-Zuluaga, L. C., & Schneider, U. (2008). Market orientation and organizational performance in the nonprofit context: Exploring both concepts and the relationship between them. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 19(2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v19n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1105–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falahat, M., Lee, Y. Y., Soto-Acosta, P., & Ramayah, T. (2021). Entrepreneurial, market, learning and networking orientations as determinants of business capability and international performance: The contingent role of government support. International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, 17(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00738-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzaneh, M., Ghasemzadeh, P., Nazari, J. A., & Mehralian, G. (2020). Contributory role of dynamic capabilities in the relationship between organizational learning and innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 655–676. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2019-0355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fikri, M. A. A., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Nugroho, Y. A., Waruwu, H., Fauji, A., & Dewi, W. R. (2020). A mediation role of organizational of learning on relationship of hard skills, soft skills, innovation and performance: Evidence at Islamic school. Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 398–423. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/Edupsycouns/article/view/498
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.00029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., Kulviwat, S., Zhu, J., & Wang, Y. J. (2019). Competing in an emerging market: Antecedents and consequences of market orientation and the role of environmental factors. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(3), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2017.1411386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., McLaughlin, M. E., & Coalter, T. M. (1996). Context, cognition, and common method variance: Psychometric and verbal protocol evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. (2007). Dynamic capabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herden, T. T. (2020). Explaining the competitive advantage generated from analytics with the knowledge-based view: The example of logistics and supply chain Management. Business Research, 13(1), 163–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-00104-x
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human, D., & Terblanche, N. S. (2012). Who receives what? The influence of the donation magnitude and donation recipient in cause-related marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 24(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2012.680317
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keats, B. W., & Bracker, J. S. (1988). Toward a theory of small firm performance: A conceptual model. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225878801200403
   Google Scholar
• Khyareh, M. M., & Rostami, N. (2021). Macroeconomic conditions, innovation and competitiveness. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2) , 1321–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00752-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, E., Wilson, C., Ereshefsky, S., Tsuji, T., Schiffman, J., Pitts, S., & Reeves, G. (2012). Convergent and discriminant validity of attenuated psychosis screening tools. Schizophrenia Research, 134(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koentjoro, S., & Gunawan, S. (2020). Managing knowledge, dynamic capabilities, innovative performance, and creating sustainable competitive advantage in family companies: A case study of a family company in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030090
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379303000406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.75.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting inter-organizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651. https://doi.org/10.2307/256824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambooy, T., Anthoni, P., & Argyrou, A. (2020). Aren’t we all pursuing societal goals in our businesses? Defining “societal purpose” as pursued by social enterprises. Sustainable Development, 28(3), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. K. M., & Chandra, Y. (2020). Dynamic and marketing capabilities as predictors of social enterprises’ performance. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(3), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00155-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, M. N., Foreman, S., & Sargeant, A. (2001). Market versus societal orientation in the nonprofit context. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 6(3), 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.151
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. F., Su, J. Q., & Higgins, A. (2016). How dynamic capabilities affect adoption of management innovations. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 862–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavaram, S., & Hunt, S. D. (2017). Customizing business-to-business (B2B) professional services: The role of intellectual capital and internal social capital. Journal of Business Research, 74, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(8), 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton, H. L., & Hartline, M. D. (2010). Customer and frontline employee influence on new service development performance. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510369378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailova, S., & Zhan, W. (2015). Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M., Verreynne, M. L., Luke, B., Eversole, R., & Barraket, J. (2014). Social enterprises and the performance advantages of a Vincentian marketing orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpandare, M., & Li, G. (2020). Utilising enterprise social media for product innovation: The role of market orientation. Sustainability, 12(9), 3913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985772
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A. (2008). Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change. OUP, Oxford. file:///C:/Users/W8/Downloads/epdf.tips_social-entrepreneurship-new-models-of-sustainable-.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Oswick, C., Fleming, P., & Hanlon, G. (2011). From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.59330932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00097.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padanyi, P., & Gainer, B. (2004). Market orientation in the nonprofit sector: Taking multiple constituencies into consideration. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 12(2), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2004.11658518
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial analysts journal, 36(4), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v36.n4.30
   Google Scholar
• Puri, R. (1996). Measuring and modifying consumer impulsiveness: A cost-benefit accessibility framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0502_01
   Google Scholar
• Putra, A. S., Novitasari, D., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Iskandar, J., Hutagalung, D., Cahyono, S., & Cahyono, Y. (2020). Examine relationship of soft skills, hard skills, innovation and performance: The mediation effect of organizational learning. International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS), 3(3), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v3i3p104
   Google Scholar
• Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A., & Brusoni, S. (2016). Institutional complexity in turbulent times: Formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1253–1284. (forthcoming) published online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real, J. C., Roldán, J. L., & Leal, A. (2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: Analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00848.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundle-Thiele, S., David, P., Willmott, T., Pang, B., Eagle, L., & Hay, R. (2019). Social marketing theory development goals: An agenda to drive change. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(1–2), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1559871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2019). The central role of knowledge integration capability in service innovation-based competitive strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, S., Luo, Y., Zhou, Y., & Wei, Y. (2019). Big data analysis adaptation and enterprises’ competitive advantages: The perspective of dynamic capability and resource-based theories. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1516866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K., & McMillan, S. (1999). Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(4), 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (2021). Sustainable marketing: Market-driving, not market-driven. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(1), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146720961836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. The Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steils, N., & Hanine, S. (2016). Creative contests: Knowledge generation and underlying learning dynamics for idea generation. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(17–18), 1647–1669. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1251956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbacka, K., & Nenonen, S. (2015). Learning with the market: Facilitating market innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukas, A. A., Worth, K. A., Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (2009). The matching of motivations to affordances in the volunteer environment an index for assessing the impact of multiple matches on volunteer outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008314810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2020). Social innovation in disability nonprofits: An abductive study of capabilities for social change. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(2), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019873965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valos, M. J., Mavondo, F. T., & Nyadzayo, M. W. (2019). How do alternative strategic orientations influence social media performance? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2017.1384039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorhies, D. W., Harker, M., & Rao, C. P. (1999). The capabilities and performance advantages of market-driven firms. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11–12), 1171–1202. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910292339
   Google Scholar
• Vu, H. M. (2020). A review of dynamic capabilities, innovation capabilities, entrepreneurial capabilities and their consequences. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics & Business, 7(8), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerawardena, J. (2003). Exploring the role of market learning capability in competitive strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 37(3–4), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310459023
   Google Scholar
• Weerawardena, J., & Sullivan Mort, G. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerawardena, J., & Sullivan Mort, G. (2012). Competitive strategy in socially entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations: Innovation and differentiation. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 31(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerawardena, J., Sullivan Mort, G., Salunke, S., Knight, G., & Liesch, P. W. (2015). The role of the market sub-system and the socio-technical sub-system in innovation and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0382-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welter, F., Baker, T., & Wirsching, K. (2019). Three waves and counting: The rising tide of contextualization in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0094-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Secchi, D., & Homberg, F. (2022). Organizational structure and organizational learning: The moderating role of organizational defensive routines. Journal of General Management, 47(4), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070211038922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, W. (2010). A social capital perspective of innovation from individuals to nations: Where is empirical literature directing us? International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Yuen, K. F., Tan, B., & Thai, V. V. (2021). The effect of maritime knowledge clusters on maritime firms’ performance: An organizational learning perspective. Marine Policy, 128, 104472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar