Rethinking the Spatiality of Spatial Planning: Methodological Territorialism and Metageographies

References

• Adams, N., Cotella, G., & Nunes, R. (2011) Territorial knowledge channels in a multi-jurisdictional policy environment. in: N. Adams, G. Cotella, & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning—Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 25–56. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (1994) The territorial trap: Geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), pp. 53–80. doi: 10.1080/09692299408434268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2003) Reconstructing decision-making: Planning versus politics. Planning Theory, 2(3), pp. 249–268. doi: 10.1177/147309520323007
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2004) Strategic (spatial) planning re-examined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), pp. 743–758. doi: 10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003) Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), pp. 113–129. doi: 10.1080/01944360308976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007) Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 41(9), pp. 1161–1175. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2007) The fluid scales and scope of spatial planning in the UK. Environment and Planning A, 39(6), pp. 1478–1496. doi: 10.1068/a38230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the thames gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), pp. 617–633. doi: 10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010) Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), pp. 803–818. doi: 10.1068/c09163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2004) Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler, 86B(1), pp. 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2006) Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), pp. 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Richardson, T., Dabinett, G., & Jensen, O. B. (2004) Values in a vacuum? Towards an integrated multi-level analysis of the governance of European space. European Planning Studies, 12(8), pp. 1175–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2011) Culture, planning and path dependence: Some reflections on the problems of comparison. The Town Planning Review, 82(1), pp. 13–28. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.4
   Google Scholar
• Brady Shipman Martin, Kirk Mcclure Morton, Fitzpatrick Associates Colin Buchanan and Partners (1999) Strategic Spatial Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area, (Dublin: Stationary Office).
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (1999) Beyond state-centrism? Space, territory and geographical scale in globalisation studies. Theory and Society, 28(2), pp. 39–78. doi: 10.1023/A:1006996806674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, (Oxford: Balackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (1994) Europe 2000+, Cooperation for European Territorial Development, (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Committee for Spatial Development (1999) The European Spatial Development Perspective, (Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Convery, F., McInerney, D., Sokol, M., & Stafford, P. (2006) Organising space in a dynamic economy—insights for policy from the Irish experience. Built Environment, 32(2), pp. 172–183. doi: 10.2148/benv.32.2.172
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe (1983) European Regional/Spatial Planning Charter: Torremolinos Charter, European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning, 20 May. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/cemat/versioncharte/Charte_bil.pdf (accessed 5 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2009) Asymmetric development in spatial planning: Positivist content and post-modernist processes?. in: S. Davoudi, & I. Strange (Eds) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 207–244. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2012) The legacy of positivism and the emergence of interpretive tradition in spatial planning. Regional Studies, 46(4), pp. 429–441. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.618120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Stead, D. (2002) Urban-rural relationships: An introduction and brief history. Built Environment, 28(4), pp. 269–277.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. (2009) Space and place in twentieth century planning: An analytical framework and historical review. in: S. Davoudi, & I. Strange (Eds) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 7–42. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I., & Lord, A. (2006) From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state. Urban Studies, 43(10), pp. 1847–1877. doi: 10.1080/00420980600838143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment and Local Government (2002) The National Spatial Strategy 2002–2020: People, Places, Potential, (Dublin: Stationary Office).
   Google Scholar
• Dublin City Council, Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council, South Dublin County Council, Fingal County Council & Dublin Regional Authority (2009) Economic Action Plan for the Dublin City Region. Available at http://www.dublincity.ie/YourCouncil/CouncilPublications/Pages/CouncilPublications.aspx (accessed 6 September 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Regional Authority (1996) Dublin: A Regional Focus, (Dublin: Dublin Regional Authority).
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Regional Authority & Mid-East Regional Authority (2004) Regional Planning Guidelines: Greater Dublin Area 2004–2016, Implementing the National Spatial Strategy (Dublin: Regional Planning Guidelines Project Office).
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Regional Authority & Mid-East Regional Authority (2009) Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area: Review—2010–2022, Directors Report on Public Consultation at Pre-Draft Stage, Dublin. Available at http://www.rpg.ie/rpg-2D2010.html (accessed 6 September 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dublin Regional Authority & Mid-East Regional Authority (2010) Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area 2010–2022. Available at http://www.rpg.ie/ (accessed 22 October 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2001) The application of the European spatial development perspective: Evidence from the North-West metropolitan area. European Planning Studies, 9(5), pp. 663–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2008) The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror. Environment and Planning A, 40(6), pp. 1470–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009) A turning point in the development of European spatial planning? The “territorial agenda of the European Union” and the “first action programme”. Progress in Planning, 71(1), pp. 1–42. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2012a) Multi-level (territorial) governance: Three criticisms. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), pp. 197–211. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677578
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2012b) Territorial cohesion and subsidiarity under the European Union treaties: A critique of the “territorialism” underlying. Regional Studies, doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.657170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1993) Towards a non-Euclidean mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), pp. 482–484. doi: 10.1080/01944369308975902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society, (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Healey, P. (1999) Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies, 7(5), pp. 623–646. doi: 10.1080/09654319908720542
   Google Scholar
• Harris, N., & Hooper, A. (2004) Rediscovering the spatial in public policy and planning: An examination of the spatial content of sectoral policy documents. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(2), pp. 147–169. doi: 10.1080/14649350410001691736
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2010) Networks of connectivity, territorial fragmentation, uneven development: The new politics of city-regionalism. Political Geography, 29(1), pp. 17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2012) Configuring the new “regional world”: On being caught between territory and networks. Regional Studies, DOI:10.1080/00343404.2011.644239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselsberger, B. (forthcoming) The shaded reality of borders: A hidden perspective for territorial cohesion in Europe. European Journal of Spatial Development, ,
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998) Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning: A, 30(9), pp. 1531–1546. doi: 10.1068/a301531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004) The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), pp. 45–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, 2nd ed. (London: Palgrave, Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2009) City-regions and place development. Regional Studies, 43(6), pp. 831–843. doi: 10.1080/00343400701861336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Cars, G., Madanipour, A., De Magalhaes, C. (2002) Transforming governance, institutionalist analysis and institutional capacity. in: G. Cars, P. Healey, A. Madanipour, & C. de Magalhaes (Eds) Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux, pp. 6–28. (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., & Booher, D. (1999) Consensus-building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), pp. 412–423. doi: 10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., & Richardson, T. (2004) Making European Space: Mobility, Power and Territorial Identity, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008) Theorising sociospatial relations. Environment & Planning: D Society and Space, 26(3), pp. 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2009) Phase space: Geography, relational thinking, and beyond. Progress in Human Geography, 334(4), pp. 487–506. doi: 10.1177/0309132508101599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läpple, D. (1991) Essay über den Raum. Für ein gesellschaftswissenschaftliches Raumkonzept. in: H. Häussermann, D. Ipsen, & T. Krämer-Badoni (Eds) Stadt und Raum. Soziologische Analysen, pp. 157–207. (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., & Wigen, K. E. (1997) The Myth of Continents, (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, G., & Jones, M. (2007) Territorial, scalar, networked, connected: In what sense a “regional world”?. Regional Studies, 41(9), pp. 1177–1191. doi: 10.1080/00343400701646182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meath County Council (1994) Meath County Development Plan, (Navan: Meath County Council).
   Google Scholar
• Meath County Council (2007) Meath County Development Plan: 2007–2013, (Navan: Meath County Council).
   Google Scholar
• Meath County Council (2011) Meath County Development Plan: 2013–2019: Strategic Issues Paper, (Navan: Meath County Council).
   Google Scholar
• Mid-East Regional Authority (1996) Regional Report (Wicklow: Mid-East Regional Authority).
   Google Scholar
• Mid-East Regional Authority (2009) The Mid-East Regional Authority Economic Development Strategy to Inform the Review of the Regional Planning Guidelines for the Greater Dublin Area 2004–2016, (Wicklow: Mid-East Regional Authority).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2007) The polycentric state: New spaces of empowerment and engagement?. Regional Studies, 41(9), pp. 1237–1251. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenroth, E. (2007) Competing in a Globalised World: An Economic Development Strategy for Kildare, (Naas: Kildare County Council).
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. (2007) The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Planning Practice and Research, 22(1), pp. 43–62. doi: 10.1080/02697450701455934
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M., & Hull, A. (2009) The futures of the city-region. Regional Studies, 43(6), pp. 777–787. doi: 10.1080/00343400903037511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2005) The changing discourses on political boundaries: Mapping the backgrounds, contexts and contents. in: H. Van Houtum, O. Kramsch, & W. Zierhofer (Eds) Bordering the World, pp. 17–31. (London: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (2009) The resurgence of the “region” and “regional identity”: Theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies, 35(S1), pp. 121–146. doi: 10.1017/S0260210509008456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perroux, F. (1968) Les Espaces Èconomiques. in: J. Boudeville (Ed.) L'Espace et les Poles de Croissance, pp. 5–40. (Paris: PUF).
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A. (2007) Whither regional studies?. Regional Studies, 41(9), pp. 1143–1148. doi: 10.1080/00343400701675587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, R. (1986) Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History, (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W., Thornley, A., & Kreukels, A. (2003) Institutional and spatial coordination in European metropolitan regions. in: W. Salet, A. Thornley, & A. Kreukels (Eds) Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-Regions, pp. 3–19. (London: Spon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schroer, M. (2006) Räume, Orte, Grenzen: Auf dem Weg zu einer Soziologie des Raums, (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. (1994) The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography, 18(2), pp. 51–162. doi: 10.1177/030913259401800202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. (1999) Worlds of large cities: Pondering castells space of flows. Third World Planning Review, 21(3), pp. iii–x.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. (2000) Embedded statism and the social sciences II: Geographies (and metageographies) in globalization. Environment and Planning A, 32(6), pp. 1105–1114. doi: 10.1068/a32153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Territorial Agenda (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, Agreed at the Occasion of the Informal Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development, 19 May. Available at http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf (accessed 5 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2009) Towards an integrated spatial planning. European Planning Studies, 17(11), pp. 1571–1590. doi: 10.1080/09654310903226499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. A. (2009) Space and place in the national spatial strategy for the Republic of Ireland. in: S. Davoudi, & I. Strange (Eds) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 95–125. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2010a) Strategic spatial planning at the regional and local scales: A case study of the Dublin City-Region, Unpublished PhD thesis, University College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2010b) Coordinating the spatial impacts of sectoral policies: Practices of and potentials for strategic spatial planning in the Dublin City Region. NIRSA working paper 61, National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis, Maynooth.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2012) Policy and planning brief: Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(3), pp. 493–496. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.707391
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Faludi, A., Stead, D., Zonneveld, W., Nadin, V. & Milder, J. (2009) Reinventing spatial planning in a borderless Europe: Emergent themes. 23rd congress of the Association of European Schools of Planning: “Why can't the future be more like the past?”, Liverpool, July 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B., Walsh, C., & Boyle, I. (2010) The development of the functional urban region of Dublin: Implications for regional development, markets and planning. Journal of Irish Urban Studies, 7–9, pp. 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W., & Stead, D. (2007) European territorial cooperation and the concept of urban rural relationships. Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), pp. 439–453. doi: 10.1080/02697450701666787
   Google Scholar