214
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Analysing How Environmental Concerns are Integrated in the Design of the EU Structural Funds Programmes

&
Pages 587-609 | Received 01 Oct 2012, Accepted 01 Dec 2012, Published online: 20 Feb 2013

References

  • Berger, G. & Naridoslawsky, M. (2004) Editorial: Regional sustainable development. The role of structural funds. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 17(1), pp. 3–9.
  • Clement, K. (2001) Strategic environmental awakening: European progress in regional environmental integration, European Environment, 11(2), pp. 75–88. doi: 10.1002/eet.253
  • Clement, K. (2005) Environment and sustainable development in the EU structural funds: A review of Nordic performance, European Environment, 15(5), pp. 294–312. doi: 10.1002/eet.393
  • Deutz, P. (2009) Producer responsibility in a sustainable development context: Ecological modernisation or industrial ecology? The Geographical Journal, 175(4), pp. 274–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2009.00330.x
  • Dryzek, J. S. (1997) The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • EEC (1991) Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment, Official Journal of the European Communities, L135, pp. 26–38 (Brussels: European Commission).
  • EEC (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, Official Journal of the European Communities, L206, pp. 7–50 (Brussels: European Commission).
  • EC (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy, Official Journal of the European Communities, L327, pp. 1–72 (Brussels: European Commission).
  • EC (2002) Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, Official Journal of the European Communities, L242, pp. 1–15 (Brussels: European Commission).
  • EC (2006) Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste (Text with EEA relevance), Official Journal of the European Union, L114, pp. 9–21 (Brussels: European Commission).
  • EC (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives (Text with EEA relevance), Official Journal of the European Union, L312, pp. 3–30 (Brussels: European Commission).
  • Ekins, P. & Medhurst, J. (2006) The European structural funds and sustainable development. A methodology and indicator framework for evaluation, Evaluation, 12(4), pp. 474–495. doi: 10.1177/1356389006071294
  • European Commission. (2004) A New Partnership for Cohesion. Convergence, Competitiveness, Cooperation. Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • European Commission. (2007) Growing Regions, Growing Europe. Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • European Commission. (2009) Cohesion Policy 2007–2013: Environment and Climate Change, Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/themes/index_en.htm (accessed 10 May 2010).
  • European Commission. (2010a) Citizens’ Awareness and Perceptions of EU Regional Policy, Flash Eurobarometer 298.
  • European Commission. (2010b) Investing in Europe‘s Future, Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
  • European Commission. (2011) Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Investing in Growth and Jobs (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).
  • Gibbs, D. (2000) Ecological modernisation, regional economic development and regional development agencies, Geoforum, 31(1), pp. 9–19. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00040-8
  • Glasson, J. (1995) Regional planning and the environment: Time for a SEA change, Urban Studies, 32(4–5), pp. 713–731. doi: 10.1080/00420989550012852
  • Glasson, J. (2002) Some interim conclusions: Regional planning guidance and regional governance for the 21st century, in: T. Marshall, J. Glasson & P. Headicar (Eds) Contemporary Issues in Regional Planning, pp. 247–264 (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).
  • Hajer, M. A. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  • Happaerts, S., Van Den Brande, K. & Bruyninckx, H. (2010) Governance for sustainable development at the inter-subnational level: The case of the network of regional governments for sustainable development (nrg4SD), Regional and Federal Studies, 20(1), pp. 127–149. doi: 10.1080/13597560903187362
  • Huber, J. (1982) Die verlorene Unschuld der Okologie (Frankfurt am Main: Fisher Verlag).
  • Huber, J. (2000) Towards industrial ecology: Sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4), pp. 269–285.
  • Jackson, T. & Roberts, P. (1999) Ecological modernization as a model for regional development: The changing nature and context of the Eastern Scotland structural fund programme, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 1(1), pp. 61–75.
  • Jänicke, M. (1985) Preventive Environmental Policy as Ecological Modernisation and Structural Policy. Discussion Paper IIUG dp 85-2, Internationales Institut Für Umwelt und Gesellschaft, Wissenschaftrum Berlin Für Sozialforschung (WZB).
  • Jänicke, M. (2008) Ecological modernisation: New perspectives, Journal of Cleaner production, 16(5), pp. 557–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011
  • Karl, H. & Ranné, O. (2001) Regional policy and the environment – the case of Germany, European Environment, 11(2), pp. 103–111. doi: 10.1002/eet.254
  • Lafferty, W. M. & Hovden, E. (2003) Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework? Environmental Politics, 12(3), pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09644010412331308254
  • Langhelle, O. (2000) Why ecological modernization and sustainable development should not be conflated, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4), pp. 303–322.
  • Mihelcic, J. & Zimmerman, J. B. (2009) Environmental Engineering: Fundamentals, Sustainability Design (New York: John Wiley).
  • Milanez, B. & Bührs, T. (2007) Marrying strands of ecological modernisation: A proposed framework, Environmental Politics, 16(4), pp. 565–583. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419105
  • Moss, T. & Fichter, H. (2004) Promoting sustainable development in EU structural fund programmes. Lessons from regional case studies, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 17(1), pp. 11–23.
  • Mullally, G. (2004) Shakespeare, the structural funds and sustainable development reflections on the Irish experience, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 17(1), pp. 25–42.
  • Roberts, P. (2001) Incorporating the environment into structural funds regional programmes: Evolution, current developments and future prospects, European Environment, 11(2), pp. 64–74. doi: 10.1002/eet.251
  • Roberts, P. (2003) Economic restructuring, regional development and the environment: Ecological modernization and the European Union's structural funds, International Journal Environment and Sustainable Development, 2(3), pp. 267–283. doi: 10.1504/IJESD.2003.003844
  • Roberts, P. (2004) Wealth from waste: Local and regional economic development and the environment, The Geographical Journal, 170(2), pp. 126–134. doi: 10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00114.x
  • Roberts, P. (2006) Evaluating regional sustainable development: Approaches, methods and the politics of analysis, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(4), pp. 515–532. doi: 10.1080/09640560600747786
  • Seippel, O. (2000) Ecological modernizations as a theoretical device: Strengths and weaknesses, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2(4), pp. 287–302.
  • Weale, A. (1992) The New Politics of Pollution (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
  • Williams, C. C. & Millington, A. C. (2004) The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development, The Geographical Journal, 170(2), pp. 99–104. doi: 10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00111.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.