The Rise of Territorial Governance in European Policy

References

• Barca, F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent Report Prepared at the Request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels: Directorate General for Regional Policy, European Commission. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/barca_en.htm (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2004) From ‘spaces of place’ to ‘spaces of flows’?, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), pp. 530–548. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2008) Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee [COM(2008)616 final], Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/consultation_en.htm (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• CEMAT (European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning) (2006) Resolution n° 2 on Territorial Governance: Empowerment Through Enhanced Coordination [14 CEMAT (2006) 13 Final]. Strasbourg, France: Regional Planning and Technical Cooperation and Assistance Division, Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• CEMAT (European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning) (2010) CEMAT Moscow Declaration on Future Challenges: Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent in a Changing World [Document 15 CEMAT (2010) Final 8E], Strasbourg, France: CEMAT Secretariat, Cultural Heritage, Landscape and Spatial Planning Division, Directorate of Culture and Cultural and Natural Heritage, Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• CoR (Committee of the Regions) (2008) Opinion of the Committee of the Regions on the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, COTER-IV-020 [CdR 274/2008 fin], Rapporteur: Jean-Yves Le Drian (PES/FR), Brussels: Committee of the Regions. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/contrib_en.htm (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• CoR (Committee of the Regions) (2009) The Committee of the Regions’ White Paper on Multilevel Governance, Brussels: Forward Studies Unit, Committee of the Regions. Available at www.cor.europa.eu/en/activities/governance/Pages/white-pape-on-multilevel-governance.aspx (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• CSD (Committee on Spatial Development) (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU, Luxembourg, France: Office for Official Publications of the European Community.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. (Eds) (2009) Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., Evans, E., Governa, F., & Santangelo, M. (2008) Territorial governance in the making. Approaches, methodologies, practices, Boletin de la A.G.E., 46(2008), pp. 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Eising, R., & Kohler-Koch, B. (Eds) (1999) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Eser, T., & Schmeitz, P. (2008) The making of the territorial agenda of the European Union—policy, polity and politics, in: A. Faludi (Ed.), European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 249–270 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2008) Turning territorial diversity into an asset—The Green Paper on territorial cohesion, Inforegio Panorama, December 28, pp. 4–7. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/information/panorama/index_en.cfm (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009a) Consultation. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion—Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength, Inforegio Website, Brussels: Directorate General for Regional Policy, European Commission. Available at www.ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/consultation/terco/consultation_en.htm (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009b) Commissioner Samecki Addresses Major Conference on Cohesion Policy and Territorial Development in Kiruna, Sweden (10–11 December), European Commission Press Release IP/09/1894, 16 September 2009, DG-REGIO, Brussels: European Commission. Available at www.europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/1894&type=HTML (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. (2011) A solution in search of a problem: A ‘garbage can’ approach to the politics of territorial cohesion, European Journal of Spatial Development, 45(2011), pp. 1–24. Available at www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20articles/refereed45.pdf (accessed 16 January 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2007) Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010) Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2012) Multi-level (Territorial) governance: Three criticisms, Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), pp. 197–211. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677578
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B., & Eichenberger, R. (1996) To harmonize or to compete? That's not the question, Journal of Public Economics, 60(3), pp. 335–349. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(95)01555-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1993) Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), pp. 482–485. doi: 10.1080/01944369308975902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2006) The rescaling of governance in Europe: New spatial and institutional rationales, European Planning Studies, 14(7), pp. 881–904. doi: 10.1080/09654310500496255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010) The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning, European Planning Studies, 14(4), pp. 525–546. doi: 10.1080/09654310500421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance, American Political Science Review, 97(2), pp. 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2010) Types of multi-level governance, in: H. Enderlein, S. Wälti & M. Zürn (Eds) Handbook on Multilevel Governance, pp. 17–31 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2010) EU territorial governance: Learning from institutional progress, European Journal of Spatial Development, 38(2010), pp. 1–28. Available at www.nordregio.se/EJSD/refereed%2038.pdf (accessed 16 January 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B. (1999) The evolution and transformation of European governance, in: R. Eising & B. Kohler-Koch (Eds) The Transformation of Governance in the European Union, pp. 14–35 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. (2007) Territorial governance in transition, Regional and Federal Studies, 17(4), pp. 499–508. doi: 10.1080/13597560701691896
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J. (2007) Reconfiguring the state: Trends in territorial governance in European states, Regional and Federal Studies, 17(4), pp. 385–403. doi: 10.1080/13597560701691912
   Google Scholar
• MUDTCEU (Ministers of Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion of the European Union) (2007) Territorial State and Perspective of the European Union: Toward a Stronger European Territorial Cohesion in the Light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Ambitions. Based on the Scoping Document Discussed by Ministers at Their Informal Ministerial Meeting in Luxembourg in May 2005, A Background Document for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Available at www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• MUDTCEU (Ministers of Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion of the European Union) (2011) The territorial state and perspectives of the European Union 2011 update. Background document for the territorial agenda of the European Union 2020. Presented at the informal meeting of ministers responsible for spatial planning and territorial development, Gödöllő, Hungary, 19 May. Available at www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu (accessed 16 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. B. (2008) Rethinking multi-level governance in a changing European Union: Why metageography and territoriality matter, GeoJournal, 72(1–2), pp. 7–18. doi: 10.1007/s10708-008-9161-9
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2001) OECD Territorial Outlook. 2001 Edition (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2009) Regions Matter: Economic Recovery, Innovation and Sustainable Growth (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (Ed) (2000) Transforming British Government (London: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. (2006) Rescaling territorial governance in the Randstad Holland: The responsiveness of spatial and institutional strategies to changing socio-economic interactions, European Planning Studies, 14(7), pp. 959–978. doi: 10.1080/09654310500496396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. (2010) Territorial cohesion discourses: Hegemonic strategic concepts in European spatial planning, Planning Theory and Practice, 11(3), pp. 397–416. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2010.500135
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2013) Policy & Planning Brief. Dimensions of territorial governance, Planning Theory and Practice, 14(1), pp. 142–147. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.758494
   Google Scholar
• Stein, A. (2010) Territorial cohesion in the context of interregional and transnational cooperation, European Spatial Research and Policy, 17(1), pp. 5–22. doi: 10.2478/v10105-010-0001-9
   Google Scholar