Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?

References

• Aasetre, J. (2000) Holdninger og kultur i norsk naturforvaltning [Attitudes and culture in Norwegian environmental management], Dr. polit. Avhandling, Geografisk institutt, Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002) Planning Futures. New Directions for Planning Theory (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Amdam, R. (2011) Planlegging og prosessleing. Korleis lykkast i lokalt utviklingsarbeid [Planning and Process Leading: How to Succeed in Local Developmental Work] (Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget).
   Google Scholar
• Amdam, J. & Amdam, R. (2000) Kommunikativ planlegging. Regional planlegging som reiskap for organisasjons- og samfunnutvikling [Communicative Planning: Regional Planning as a Tool for Organizational and Social Development] (Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget).
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T., Overvåg, K., Glørsen, E., Schurman, C. & Riise, Ø. (2010) Fjellområder og fjellkommuner i Sør-Norge. Definisjon, avgrensning og karakterisering [Mountain Areas and Mountain Municipalities in Southern Norway: Definitions, Delimitations, and Characterizations], ØF-rapport 08/2010. Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T., Overvåg, K., Skjeggedal, T. & Ericsson, B. (2012) Transcending orthodoxy: The multi-house home, leisure and the transformation of core periphery relations, in: M. Danson & P. de Souza (Eds) Regional Development in Northern Europe. Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues, pp. 182–195 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T. & Riseth, J. Å. (2008) Konfliktfyllda naturskyddsprocesser i Norge [Conflicted nature-conservation processes in Norway], in: C. Sandström, S. Hovik & E. I. Falleth (red.) Omstridd natur. Trender och utmaningar i nordisk naturförvaltning [Controversial Nature: Trends and Challenges in Nordic Nature Management], pp. 83–104 (Umeå: Borea).
   Google Scholar
• Asmervik, S. (2012) The Art of Planning. To Listen, Read, Speak and Write (Trondheim: Akademika Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Asplan Viak & Agenda Kaupang (2012) Innsigelsesinstituttets påvirkning på lokalt selvstyre [The Objections Institute's Influence on Local Autonomy], Sluttrapport, Sandvika: Asplan Viak.
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P. & Mäntysalo, R. (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice—The case of Finland, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp. 333–350. doi:10.1177/1473095210373684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banfield, E. (1959) Ends and means in planning, in: A. Faludi (Eds) (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory, pp. 139–149 (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bråtå, H. O., Ericsson, B., Reimers, E. & Skjeggedal, T. (2014) Regionale planer for bruk og vern og villreinfjellene. Evaluering av prosess og planer [Regional Plans for Land Use and Protection and the Wild-reindeer Mountains: An Evaluation of Processes and Plans], ØF-rapport 2/2014. Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Bugge, H. C. (2011) Lærebok i miljøforvaltningsrett [Textbook on Environmental-Administration Law], 3rd ed. (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).
   Google Scholar
• Directorate for Nature Management (2008) Lokal forvaltning av verneområder – en evaluering av delegering. Direktoratet for naturforvaltnings tilrådning til Miljøverndepartementet [Local Administration of Protected Areas: An Evaluation of Delegation. The Directorate for Nature Management's Recommendations to the Ministry of the Environment] (Trondheim: Direktoratet for naturforvaltning).
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E. I. & Hovik, S. (2008) Lokal forvaltning av store verneområder. Erfaringer fra fire forsøk [Lessons Learned—Review of Four Trials in Local Management of Protected Areas], NIBR-rapport 2008:11, Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E. I., Hovik, S. & Sandström, C. (2008) Blåfjella – Skjækerfjella Låarthe – Skæhkre. Evaluering av et lokalt forvaltningsforsøk i en nasjonalpark [Evaluation of an Administrative Trial of Local Management in a National Park], NIBR-rapport 2008:1, Oslo: Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Fedreheim, G. E. (2013) Value creation on Norway's green gold. An analysis of policy formulation and implementation in the field of nature conservation, PhD thesis, Universitetet i Nordland, Bodø.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, F. & Forester, J. (Eds.) (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning (Durham: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1991) Rationalitet og magt. Bind II: Et case-basert studium af planlægning, politik og modernitet [Rationality and Power, Vol. II: A Case-based Study of Planning, Politics and Modernity] (København: Akademisk Forlag).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society (London: Heinemann).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Cambridge: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Houndmills: Macmillian Press Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2002) Direct action and agonism in democratic planning practice, in: P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds) Planning Futures. New Directions for Planning Theory, pp. 110–135 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2003) Agonizing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’, Planning Theory, 2(1), pp. 37–59. doi:10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. I. & Booher, D. E. (2010) Planning with Complexity (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959) The science of “Muddling Through”, in: A. Faludi (Ed) (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory, pp. 151–169 (Oxford: Pergamon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Saglie, I.-L. & Cars, G. (2011) Between input legitimacy and output efficiency: Defensive routines and agonistic reflectivity in Nordic land-use planning, European Planning Studies, 19(12), pp. 2109–2126. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.632906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljøverndepartementet (2004) Verneplan for Verdal – Snåsa – Lierne [Protection plan for Verdal – Snåsa – Lierne], Royal Decree, December 17, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Miljøverndepartementet (2006) Verneplan for Reinheimen [Protection plan for Reinheimen], Royal Decree, November 24, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Miljøverndepartementet (2007) Fylkesdelplaner for bruk og vern av prioriterte fjellområder – fastsetting av nasjonale villreinområder [County master plan for the use and protection of prioritized mountain areas: The determination of national wild-reindeer areas], Letter, April 12, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Miljøverndepartementet (2009) Verneplan for Breheimen [Protection plan for Breheimen], Royal Decree, August 7, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mose, I. & Weixlbaumer, N. (2007) A new paradigm for protected areas in Europe? in: I. Mose (Ed) Protected Areas and Regional Development in Europe. Towards a New Model for the 21st Century, pp. 3–19 (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited).
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), pp. 745–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2013) Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically (London: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Nordregio (2004) Mountain Areas in Europe: Analysis of Mountain Areas in EU Member States, Acceding and Other European Countries (Stockholm: Nordregio).
   Google Scholar
• NOU (2003:14) Bedre kommunal og regional planlegging etter plan- og bygningsloven II. Planlovutvalgets utredning med lovforslag [Better Municipal and Regional Planning According to the Planning and Building Act II: The Planning Law Committee's Report with Proposals] (Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet).
   Google Scholar
• NOU (2004:28) Lov om bevaring av natur, landskap og biologisk mangfold (Naturmangfoldloven) [The Law on the Protection of Nature, Landscape and Biological Diversity] (Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet).
   Google Scholar
• Pløger, J. (2004) Strife: Urban planning and agonism, Planning Theory, 3(1), pp. 71–92. doi:10.1177/1473095204042318
   Google Scholar
• Pløger, J. (2012) Planlegging, kunnskap og makt [Planning, knowledge and power], in: N. Aarsæther, E. Falleth, T. Nyseth & R. Kristiansen (Eds.) Utfordringer for norsk planlegging [Challenges of Norwegian Planning], pp. 256–272 (Oslo: Cappelen Damm Høyskoleforlaget).
   Google Scholar
• Prop. 1 S (2009–2010) Miljøverndepartementet [Ministry of Environment] (Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet).
   Google Scholar
• Riksrevisjonen (2014) Riksrevisjonens undersøking av forvaltninga av nasjonalparkar [The Office of the Auditor General's Inspection of the Administration of National Parks], Riksrevisjonens administrative rapport nr. 1, Oslo: Riksrevisjonen.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (1994) Communicative Planning Theory (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2013) Reviving Critical Planning Theory (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Sevatdal, H. (1999) Real estate planning: An applied academic subject, Kart og Plan, 59, pp. 258–266.
   Google Scholar
• Skjeggedal, T. (2005) Ambitions and realities in Norwegian regional planning, European Planning Studies, 13(5), pp. 731–748. doi:10.1080/09654310500139582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjeggedal, T., Arnesen, T., Markhus, G. & Thingstad, Per. G. (2004) Management strategies in forest landscapes in Norway, in: H. Palang, H. Sooväli, M. Antrop & G. Setten (Eds) European Rural Landscapes: Persistence and Change in a Globalising Environment, pp. 425–444 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Skjeggedal, T., Overvåg, K., Flognfeldt, T. & Ringholm, T. (2013) Ti år med “fjellteksten” [Ten years of ‘the mountain text'], Utmark – tidsskrift for utmarksforskning [online], (1). Available at www.utmark.org (accessed 14 May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk Sentralbyrå (1999) Regionale inndelinger. En oversikt over standarder i norsk statistikk [Regional Subdivisions: An Overview of Standards in Norwegian Statistics], C 513 Norges offisielle statistikk, Oslo: Kongsvinger.
   Google Scholar
• Statistisk Sentralbyrå (2013) Vernede områder [Protected Areas]. Available at http://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/statistikker/arealvern (accessed 2 October 2014).
   Google Scholar
• St.meld. nr. 62 (1991–1992) Ny landsplan for nasjonalparker og andre større verneområder i Norge [New Land-use Plan for National Parks and Other Large Protected Areas in Norway] (Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet).
   Google Scholar
• St.meld. nr. 25 (2008–2009) Lokal vekstkraft og framtidstru. Om distrikts- og regionalpolitikken [Local Developmental Power and Belief in the Future: On Rural and Developmental Policy] (Oslo: Kommunal- og regionaldepartementet).
   Google Scholar
• St.prp. nr. 65 (2002–2003) Tilleggsbevilgninger og omprioriteringer i statsbudsjettet medregnet folketrygden 2003 [Additional Grants and Reordering of Priorities in the State Budget Taking into Account the National Insurance Scheme 2003] (Oslo: Finansdepartementet).
   Google Scholar
• Winge, N. K. (2013) Kampen om arealene. Rettslige styringsmidler for en helhetlig arealforvaltning [The Fight Over the Areas: Legal Instruments for General Land-use Management] (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).
   Google Scholar