Collective entrepreneurship: the Basque model of innovation

References

• Amin, A., & Cohendet, P. (1999). Learning and adaptation in decentralised business networks. Environment and Planning D, 17, 87–104. doi: 10.1068/d170087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37, 353–369. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranguren, M., Navarro, M., & Wilson, J. (2014). From plan to process: Exploring the leadership implications of RIS3. San Sebastian: Orkestra.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Begg, I., Charles, D., & Polverari, L. (2015, February 4–6). What have structural and cohesion funds done for us? Assessing the long-term achievements of cohesion policy 1989–2012. Paper to the 2nd Joint EU Cohesion Policy Conference ‘Challenges for the New Cohesion Policy 2014-2020: An Academic and Policy Debate’, Riga.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (2004). Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Public Administration, 82(2), 249–262. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2008). Regional innovation policy. In B. Noteboom & E. Stam (Eds.), Micro-foundations for innovation policy (pp. 315–341). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within EU member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Morgan, K. (1998). The associational economy: Firms, regions and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Etxabe, I., & Valdaliso, J. (2013). Who are the most networked agents within the Basque cluster associations? Bilbao: University of the Basque Country.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3 Guide). Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the “policy mix” for innovation. Research Policy, 40, 702–713. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., Goddard, J., Goenaga, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., & Morgan, K. (2012). RIS3 guide. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Gobierno Vasco. (2014). PCTI Euskadi 2020. Vitoria: Gobierno Vasco.
   Google Scholar
• Gobierno Vasco. (2015, June 25). Deployment strategy of RIS3 Euskadi, DG Regio Seminar, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarretxe, J. (2015). The Basque experience: Constructing sustainable human development. Leioa: Agirre Lehendakaria Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialisation in practice. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landabaso, M. (2014). Time for the real economy: The need for new forms of public entrepreneurship. Scienze Regionali, 13(1), 127–139. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001007
   Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., & Zukauskaite, E. (2015). Policy learning and smart specialization. Lund: CIRCLE, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2013a). Basque country RIS3: An expert assessment for DG regio. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2013b). Path dependence and the state: The politics of novelty in old industrial regions. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Reframing regional development: Evolution, innovation, transition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (in press). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2014). Innovation in the public sector. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, M., Aranguren, M., & Magro, E. (2011). Smart specialisation strategies: The case of the Basque country. San Sebastian: Orkestra.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, M., Valdaliso, J. M., Aranguren, M. J., & Magro, E. (2014). A holistic approach to regional strategies: The case of the Basque country. Science and Public Policy, 41, 532–547. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). OECD reviews of regional innovation: Basque country. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Orkestra. (2013). The Basque country competitiveness report 2013. San Sebastian: Orkestra.
   Google Scholar
• Orkestra. (2015). The Basque country competitiveness report 2015. San Sebastian: Orkestra.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Di Cataldo, M. (2015). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673–706. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E. (2008). Key dilemmas of regional innovation policy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(3), 243–261. doi:10.1080/13511610701707383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdaliso, J. (2015). The Basque country: Past trajectory and path dependence in policy and strategy making. In J. Valdaliso, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Strategies for shaping regional competitiveness (pp. 113–130). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valdaliso, J., Magro, E., Navarro, M., Aranguren, M. J., & Wilson, J. R. (2014). Path dependence in policies supporting smart specialisation strategies: Insights from the Basque case. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 390–408. doi:10.1108/EJIM-12-2013-0136
   Google Scholar