The EU integrated urban development policy: managing complex processes in dynamic places

References

• Aberman, N. L., Birner, R., Haglund, E., Ngigi, M., Ali, S., Okoba, B., & Alemu, T. (2015). Understanding the policy landscape for climate change adaptation: A cross-country comparison using the Net-Map method. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. A. (2010). The Sage handbook of geographical knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. A., & Duncan, S. J. (Eds.). (1989). The power of place: Bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. T. (2003). New trends in urban policies in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark. Cities, 20(2), 77–86. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00116-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., Calvaresi, C., Fedeli, V., Pacchi, C., Valsecchi, E., & Zanoni, D. (2008). G-FORS project country case study: Italy – WP 8. Milano: University of Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, D. C., & Bressers, H. (2011). Complex and dynamic implementation processes: The renaturalization of the Dutch Regge River. Enschede: University of Twente, in collaboration with the Dutch Water Governance Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, H. (2004). Implementing sustainable development: How to know what works, where, when and how. In W. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function (pp. 284–318). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, H. (2009). From public administration to policy networks: Contextual interaction analysis. In S. Nahrath & F. Varone (Eds.), Rediscovering public law and public administration in comparative policy analysis: Tribute to Peter Knoepfel (pp. 123–142). Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, J. T. A., Klok, P. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2000). Explaining policy action: A deductive but realistic theory. Quebec: IPSA World Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, N., van Twist, M., & Ten Heuvelhof, E. (2013). Exploring the temporal dimension in policy evaluation studies. Policy Sciences, 46(1), 23–37. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9169-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Raymond, C. (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied geography, 27(2), 89–111. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Raymond, C. M., & Corcoran, J. (2015). Mapping and measuring place attachment. Applied Geography, 57, 42–53. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciapaglia, M., & Yung, L. (2013). Participatory place mapping in fire planning place-based conservation (pp. 183–196). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cacciapaglia, M. A., Yung, L., & Patterson, M. E. (2012). Place mapping and the role of spatial scale in understanding landowner views of fire and fuels management. Society & Natural Resources, 25(5), 453–467. doi:10.1080/08941920.2011.580418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T. (1994). Current trends and future directions in program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 229–238. doi:10.1016/0886-1633(94)90016-7
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. (2013). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, F., Denters, B., Klok, P.-J., & Kotzebue, J. (2008). G-fors Dutch national report. Strategic environmental assessment particulate matter. Retrieved August 30, 2011, from University Twente, http://doc.utwente.nl/60770/1/Coenen08g-fors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (1996). In place/out of place geography, ideology, and transgression. Retrieved from http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=310353
   Google Scholar
• Dassen, A. (2010). Networks: Structure and action: Steering in and steering by policy networks. Twente: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Difu, G. I. o. U. A. (Ed.). (2012). 5 Years after the Leipzig Charter – Integrated Urban development as a prerequisite for a sustainable city. Integrated Urban development in the EU member states and its candidate countries: Federal ministry of transport, building and Urban development.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & van Buuren, A. (2005). The learning evaluation. A theoretical and empirical exploration. Evaluation Review, 29(6), 591–612. doi:10.1177/0193841X05276126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA. (2012). Urban environment. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/urban/intro
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. D. (2011). Access points: An institutional theory of policy bias and policy complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EUcom. (2006a). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament on thematic strategy on the Urban environment Report No. {SEC(2006) 16 }. Brussels: E. Commission http://ec.europa.eu/environment/urban/pdf/com_2005_0718_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EUcom. (2006b). Council regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European regional development fund, the European social fund and the cohesion fund and repealing regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (Vol. 1083/2006): European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EUcom. (2006c). The 2007–2013 programming period: Methodological working documents. Evaluation during the programming period: On-going evaluation. An integrated management tool. Brussel: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EUcom. (2007). Indicative guidelines on evaluation methods: Evaluation during the programming period: E. Commission. Retrieved from Working Paper Document.
   Google Scholar
• EUcom. (2014a). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions – The Urban dimension of EU policies – Key features of an EU Urban agenda. European commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/urb_agenda/pdf/comm_act_urb_agenda_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EUcom. (2014b). Integrated sustainable Urban development. Cohesion 2014–2020. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EUcom. (2015). European structural and investment funds guidance for member states, programme authorities and cities. Article 7 on integrated sustainable Urban development of the regulation 301/2013 on the European regional development fund. (EGESIF_15-0010-00). European commission. Retrieved from http://www.fomento.gob.es/NR/rdonlyres/92E48F88-75C7-430B-9D95-7F7C150FB39D/129936/EGESIF_15001000GNArt7onISUD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evers, J., Bressers, J., & Leussen, W. (2012). Gebiedsontwikkeling Veilen: traditionele uitvoering versus interactieve uitvoering-een spelsimulatie. Bestuurswetenschappen, 2012(3), 35–59. Retrieved from http://doc.utwente.nl/81060/
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2004). Beyond empiricism: Policy analysis as deliberative practice. In M. Hajer (Ed.), Deliberative policy analysis understanding governance in the network society (pp. 209–227). Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2010). Complexity and public policy: A new approach to twenty-first century politics, policy and society. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 463–496. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, M. L. (1986). The ‘too few cases/too many variables’ problem in implementation research. The Western Political Quarterly, 39(2), 328–347. doi:10.2307/448302
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A. O. M., Lester, J. P., & O’Toole, J. L. J. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Grajewski, R. (2010). Halbzeitbewertung des EPLR Hamburg. Braunschweig, FAL Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Güntner, S., & Walther, U. J. (2013). Aufstieg und Fall der sozialen Stadtpolitik in Europa–Das Ende einer Ära? In S. Güntner & U. J. Walther (Eds.), Polarisierte Städte: Soziale Ungleichheit als Herausforderung für die Stadtpolitik (pp. 287–308). Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. L., & Hill, M. J. (2006). The three action levels of governance: Re-framing the policy process beyond the stages model. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public policy (pp. 13–30). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• INTERACT. (2012). Practical handbook for ongoing evaluation of territorial cooperation programmes. Retrieved from http://admin.interact-eu.net/downloads/1674/_INTERACT_Handbook_Ongoing_Evaluation_of_Territorial_Cooperation_Programmes_01_2012_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2008). Institutions and institutionalism in political economy: A strategic-relationship approach. In B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Debating institutionalism (pp. 210–231). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., & Watts, M. (2000). Dictionary of human geography. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotzebue, J. R. (2012). Spatial Misfits in multilevel governance. Impacts on the small island state of Malta. Enschede: University Twente Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotzebue, J. R., & Bressers, H. T. A. (2010). Biodiversity and aquaculture policy in the European Union: Spatial misfits in Malta’s multilevel policy implementation process. International Journal of Environmental Consumerism, 6(11–12), 17–27. Retrieved from http://siddharaja.in/international-journal-of-consumerism/
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. (2012). Planning, design and the complexity of cities. In Complexity theories of cities have come of age (pp. 191–205). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. B. (2012). For space. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• May, J. V., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1978). The policy cycle. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1981). Effective policy implementation. Lexington: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1999). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministers, E. (2007). Leipzig charter on sustainable European cities. Leipzig: European commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oßenbrügge, J., & Vogelpohl, A. (Eds.). (2014). Theorien in der Raum- und Stadtforschung. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. Jr (1986). Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: An assessment of the field. Journal of Public Policy, 6(2), 181–210. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00006486
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. Jr (2004). Implementation theory and the challenge of sustainable development: The transformative role of learning. In W. M. Lafferty (Ed.), Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function (pp. 32–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• OUP. (2012). Oxford dictionaries. Retrieved 20.01.2012, from Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://oxforddictionaries.com
   Google Scholar
• Owens, K. A. (2008). Understanding how actors influence policy implementation: A comparative study of wetland restorations in New Jersey, Oregon, The Netherlands and Finland. Enschede: University Twente Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Stoker, G. (2008). The promise and performance of institutional analysis: Conclusions. In B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Debating institutionalism (pp. 232–240). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PLS. (2003). Bericht über die Halbzeitbewertung des Ziel-2-Programms für Hamburg/ St. Pauli 2000–2006. Hamburg: Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. (2000). Meervoudig ruimtegebruik: stimulansen en belemmeringen. Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenburg, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2002). Evaluation of multifunctional land use: Design and application of policy criteria. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147–156. doi:10.1017/S1049096500050630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. P. A., & Mazmanian, D. A. (1983). Implementation of public policy. Grenview: Scott Foresman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. (2010). Geography as a tool for developing the mind: A theory of place-making. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. (2000). Complexity and urban coherence. Journal of Urban Design, 5(3), 291–316. doi:10.1080/713683969
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Oxford: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, E., & Hauck, J. (2010). Net-Map: Collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods, 22(3), 231–249. doi:10.1177/1525822X10374798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1987). Probative logic. Argumentation: Across the lines of discipline, 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, W., & Reynolds, M. (2010). Critical systems heuristics. In: R. Martin & H. Sue (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 243–292). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ungemach-Bensaid, S. (2011). In itinere evaluation report 2011 Toulouse: P. L'Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wouden, R., Hamers, B., & Verwest, F. (2006). Toekomstverkenning grotestedenbeleid: een beschouwing. Bilthoven: Ruimtelijk Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration Society 6, 445–488. doi:10.1177/009539977500600404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmer, C., & Kübler, D. (Eds.). (2014). Regenerating urban neighbourhoods in Europe. Eight case studies in six European countries (Vol. 3). Aarau: Aarau Centre for Democracy Studies at the University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. J., & Dear, J. M. (Eds.). (1989). The power of geography: How territory shapes social life. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.
   Google Scholar