From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories

References

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). Political losers as a barrier to economic development. American Economic Review, 90(2), 126–130. doi:10.1257/aer.90.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Yuill, D. (2001). Policies and strategies for regional development: A shift in paradigm? (Regional and industrial policy research paper, N. 46). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009, April). An agenda for the reformed cohesion policy. Report to the Commissioner for Regional Policy, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2011). Alternative approaches to development policy: Intersections and divergencies. (OECD Regional Outlook 2011, pp. 215–225). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2014). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialization: Comparison of two European policy concepts. Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). Technological relatedness and regional branching. In H. Bathelt, M. P. Feldman, & D. F. Kogler (Eds.), Beyond territory. Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation (pp. 64–81). London: Routledge. doi:10.1111/ecge.12001
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2001). The economic role and spatial contradictions of global city-regions: The functional, cognitive and evolutionary context. In A. J. Scott (Ed.), Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy (pp. 96–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2009). Territorial capital and regional development. In R. Capello & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional growth and development theories (pp. 118–132). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.4337/9781848445987.00014
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2016). Territorial capital, competitiveness and regional development. In R. Huggins & P. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of regions and competitiveness: Contemporary theories and perspectives on economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.681640
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Towards smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(2), 355–389. doi:10.1111/grow.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2015). Rationale and design of EU cohesion policies in a period of crisis. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 7(1), 25–47. doi:10.1111/rsp3.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2014). The rise of second-rank cities: What role for agglomeration economies? European Planning Studies. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.904999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Fratesi, U. (2015). Territorial scenarios in Europe: Growth and disparities beyond the economic crisis. Europa Regional, 21(4), 190–209. pid:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-457139
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R. (2014). Smart specialization strategy and the EU policy reform: Introductory remarks. Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 5–14. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001001
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (Eds.). (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation: An inquiry on the knowledge economy in European regions. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Territorial capital and regional growth: Increasing returns in knowledge use. Tijdschriftvoor Economische en Sociale Geographie (TESG), 102(4), 385–405. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramis, A., & Fay Lucianetti, L. (2016). Scoperta Imprenditoriale e Strategie di Specializzazione Intelligente: dalla Teoria alla Pratica. Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science.
   Google Scholar
• Coffano, M., & Foray, D. (2014). The centrality of entrepreneurial discovery in building and implementing a smart specialisation strategy, Scienze Regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 33–50. doi:10.1080/09537325.2014.1002464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012). Complex adaptive innovation systems: Relatedness and transversality in the evolving region (regions and cities). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2005, May). Territorial state and perspectives of the European Union, scoping document and summary of political messages. Luxembourg. Retrieved February 24, 2016, from file:///C:/Users/Capello/Documents/Capello/Volumi/territorial_state_and_perspectives.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J. (2011). Why location matters: The terms of a debate (OECD Regional Outlook 2011, pp. 167–174). Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264120983-en.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2009). Understanding smart specialisation. In D. Pontikakis, D. Kyriakou, & R. van Bavel (Eds.), The question of R&D specialisation (pp. 19–28). Brussels: JRC, European Commission, Directoral General for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). Smart specialisation, opportunities and challenges for regional innovations policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation - the concept (Knowledge Economists Policy Brief No. 9). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/kfg_policy_brief_no9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P., & Hall, B. (2011, November). Smart specialisation. From academic idea to political instrument. The surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation (MTEI-working paper). Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., Goddard, J., Goenaga Beldarrain, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., … Ortega-Artile’s, R. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). European Commission, Smart Specialisation Platform. Retrieved October 30, 2015, from http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=a39fd20b-9fbc-402b-be8c-b51d03450946&groupId=10157
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Rainoldi, A. (2013). Smart specialisation programmes and implementtation report EUR 26002 EN (S3 Policy Brief Series. No. 02/2013). Seville: European Commission, JRC-IPTS.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giannitsis, T. (2009). Technology and specialization: Strategies, options, risks (Knowledge Economists Policy Brief No. 8). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/kfg_policy_brief_no8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V. (2010). Cities and development. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 515–540. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00636.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level: Some open questions, Scienze Regionali. Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 107–126. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., & Guzzini, E. (2016). Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: The missing links in S3 Design and Implementation. European Planning Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2011). Non-market effects on agglomeration and their policy responses: Can we overcome the mismatch? (OECD Regional Outlook 2011, pp. 195–201). Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264120983-en
   Google Scholar
• Komninos, N., Musyck, B., & Reid, A. I. (2014). Smart specialisation strategies in south Europe during crisis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 448–471. doi:10.1108/EJIM-11-2013-0118
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23, 2079–2098. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H., Dornbusch, F., & Schnabl, E. (2015). Universities’ regional involvement in Germany: How academics’ objectives and opportunity shape choices of activity. Regional Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1051016
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H., Muller, E., Schnabl, E., & Zenker, A. (2014). From smart concept to challenging practice – How European regions deal with the commission’s request for novel innovation strategies (Working paper Policy and Region No. R2/2014). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Kroll, H., & Stahlecker, T. (2015). Prozess und Auswirkungen der Entwicklung von “Strategien intelligenter Spezialisierung” in deutschen Ländern (Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem No. 14-2015). Berlin: EFI.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landabaso, M. (1997). The promotion of innovation in regional policy: Proposals for a regional innovation strategy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9, 1–24. doi:10.1080/08985629700000001
   Google Scholar
• Landabaso, M. (2012). What public policies can and cannot do for regional development. In P. Cooke, M. D. Parrilli, & J. L. Curbelo (Eds.), Innovation, global challenge and territorial resilience (pp. 364–381). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Landabaso, M. (2014). Time for the real economy: The need for new forms of public entrepreneurship. Scienze Regionali, Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 127–140. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001007
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). The role of the smart specialisation agenda in a reformed EU cohesion policy. Scienze Regionali – Italian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 15–32. doi:10.3280/SCRE2014-001002
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2011). Why and when development policy should be place-based (OECD regional outlook 2011, pp. 203–213). Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264120983-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2001). OEcd territorial outlook. Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264189911-en
   Google Scholar
• Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 97–110. doi:10.1023/A:1013104805703
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., Komninos, N., Sanchez, J., & Tsanakas, P. (2012). RIS3 national assessment: Greece. (Smart Specialisation as a Means to Foster Economic Renewal Report to the European Commission, DG Regional Policy). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Stanovnik, P. (2013). The development of a smart specialisation strategy (S3) for Slovenia (Report to the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51–67. doi:10.1080/00343400701654186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., di Cataldo, M., & Rainoldi, A. (2014). The role of government institutions for smart specialisation and regional development, JRC technical reports (S3 Policy Brief Series No. 04/2014). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, A. (2003, July). An agenda for a growing Europe. Brussels: The Sapir Report to the EU.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2009). World development report. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-7607-2
   Google Scholar