The role of the scholar in times of crisis

References

• Aalbers, M. B. (2009). The sociology and geography of mortgage markets: Reflections on the financial crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2), 281–290. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00875.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2009). Cities for people, not for profit: Introduction. CITY, 13(2–3), 176–184. doi:10.1080/13604810903020548
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012a). Editorial: Lots of words … but do any of them matter? The challenge of engaged scholarship. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(3), 349–353. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.711508
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012b). Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 135–146. doi:10.1177/0739456X11436347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2012). Why mass media matter to planning research: The case of megaprojects. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 169–181. doi:10.1177/0739456X12441950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A. (1999). On writing and tenure. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 98–103. doi:10.1177/0739456X9901900110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A. (2012). Commentary: Alternative cultures in planning research – from extending scientific frontiers to exploring enduring questions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 160–168. doi:10.1177/0739456X12442217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A., & Crewe, K. (2006). Research in environmental design: Definitions and limits. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 23(2), 160–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. (2009). A sociology for public sociology: Some needed disciplinary changes for creating public sociology. In I. Jeffries (Eds.), A handbook of public sociology (pp. 123–134). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Carmin, J. (2006). Compact, diffuse, or would-be discipline? Assessing cohesion in planning scholarship, 1963–2002. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26, 66–79. doi:10.1177/0739456X05282353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H., & Mair, G. (2010). The use and valuation of journals in planning scholarship: Peer assessment versus impact factors. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30(1), 66–75. doi: 10.1177/0739456X10375944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2014). Urban responses to the economic crisis: Confirmation of urban policies as crisis management in malmö. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 285–301. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, M. J. (1988). Urban housing crisis. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 8(6), 81–91. doi:10.1108/eb013062
   Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2008). From the subprime to the exotic: Expanded mortgage market risk and implications for metropolitan communities and neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(1), 59–76. doi:10.1080/01944360701702313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2009). The foreclosure crisis, foreclosed properties, and federal policy: Some implications for housing and community development planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(4), 406–423. doi:10.1080/01944360903124316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immergluck, D. (2011). Foreclosed: High-risk lending, deregulation, and the undermining of America’s mortgage market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, P., & Schweitzer, L. (2010). Design determinism, post-meltdown: Urban planners and the search for policy relevance. Housing Policy Debate, 20(2), 317–327. doi:10.1080/10511481003738617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R. (2010). After the global economic crisis: Policy implications for the future of the European territory. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 8, 601–612.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. D., & McClure, K. (2010). Rethinking federal housing policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 319–348. doi:10.1080/01944363.2010.484793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackett, R. L. (1977). Models and urban-planning crisis. Town Planning Review, 48(3), 287–298. doi:10.3828/tpr.48.3.r020n01485k6k149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. (2010). Can planning affect the economic crisis? Barely, and not unless planning changes radically. Berkeley Planning Journal, 23(1), 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Markusen, A. (2015). How real world work, advocacy, and political economy strengthen planning research and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(2), 143–152. doi:10.1080/01944363.2015.1040053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, K. (2010). Go public! Using publicly available data to understand the foreclosure crisis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(2), 160–171. doi:10.1080/01944360903586738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., & Gonzalez, S. (2013). ‘Don't waste a crisis’: Opening up the city Yet again for neoliberal experimentation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1075–1082. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo, P. C., & Ponzini, D. (2010). Spatial planning and urban development. Critical perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., & Lefevre, C. (1996). The urban transport crisis in North America and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Great expectations: An innovation solution to the contemporary economic crisis. European Planning Studies, 20(9), 1429–1438. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.709059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2011). Neoliberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990–2010. Progress in Planning, 76(4), 147–199. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (2008). Critical about criticality. Critical Planning, 15, 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• Shalala, D. E., & Vitullo-Martin, J. (1989). Rethinking the urban crisis: Proposals for a national Urban Agenda. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(1), 3–13. doi:10.1080/01944368908975396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M. (2012). The role of the planning scholar: Research, conflict and social change. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 147–159. doi:10.1177/0739456X12440729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugrue, T. (1996). The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. (2011). The financial crisis inquiry report. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/fcic/20110310173545/http://c0182732.cdn1.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/fcic_final_report_full.pdf
   Google Scholar