Activist planning: a response to the woes of neo-liberalism?

References

• Addie, J.-P. D. (2009). Constructing neoliberal urban democracy in the American inner-city. Local Economy, 24(6–7), 536–554. doi:10.1080/02690940903314944
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (1999). Planners as catalysts and initiators of change: The new structure plan for Flanders. International Planning Studies, 7(5), 587–603. doi:10.1080/09654319908720540
   Google Scholar
• Angotti, T. (2008). New York for sale. Community planning confronts global real estate. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angotti, T., & Kennedy, M. (2012). Occupy urban planning! Progressive Planning, 191(Spring), pp. 2, 5, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten, G. (2000). From community planning to partnership planning. Urban regeneration and shifting power geometries on the south bank, London. GeoJournal, 51(4), 293–300. doi:10.1023/A:1012236328008
   Google Scholar
• Beard, V. A. (2012). Citizen planners: From self-help to political transformation. In R. Weber & R. Crane (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban planning (pp. 706–721). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, S., Dinerstein, A. C., & Spicer, A. (2010). (Im)possibilities of autonomy: Social movements in and beyond capital, the state and development. Social Movement Studies, 9(1), 17–32. doi:10.1080/14742830903442485
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, J., Frandsen, M., & Larsen, J. L. (2008). Supertanker: In search of urbanity. Architectural Review Quarterly, 12(2), 173–181. doi.10.1017/S135913550800105X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, R. G., & Reardon, K. M. (2013). Beyond the ladder: New ideas about resident roles in contemporary community development in the United States. In N. Carmon & S.S. Fainstein (Eds.), Policy, planning, and people. Promoting justice in urban development (pp. 356–381). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., & Mayer, M. (2012). Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, T. (2000). Community roles in urban regeneration. New partnerships on London’s south bank. City, 4(3), 363–377. doi:10.1080/713657033
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, S., & Frediani, A. A. (2014). Insurgent citizenship practices: The case of Muungano wa Wanavijiji in Nairobi, Kenya. City, 18(2), 119–133. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.896637
   Google Scholar
• Chandhoke, N. (2010). Civil society. In A. Cornwall & D. Eade (Eds.), Deconstructing development discourse buzzwords and fuzzwords (pp. 175–184). Rugby, UK: Practical Action and Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A., Tang, C., Torres, C., Douglas, D., Ramos, D., Micah, R., & Shakir, U. (2004). Alternative social planning: A paradigm shift. Developing an inclusive, healthy Toronto. Toronto: Alternative Planning Group.
   Google Scholar
• Clavel, P., & Kraushaar, R. (1998). On being unreasonable: Progressive planning in Sheffield and Chicago. International Planning Studies, 3(2), 143–162. doi:10.1080/13563479808721706
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, J., Curl, S., Arredondo, G., & Malagon, J. (2015). Making health equity planning work: A relational approach in Richmond, California. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(3), 265–281. doi:10.1177/0739456X15580023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, D. (2004). Activist planning and the neoliberal city: The case of Planning Action. Progressive Planning Magazine, (Summer). Retrieved May 7, 2014, from http://www.plannersnetwork.org/2004/07/activist-planning-and-the-neoliberal-city-the-case-of-planning-action
   Google Scholar
• De Souza, M. L. (2006). Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social movements as ‘critical urban planning’ agents. City, 10(3), 327–342. doi:10.1080/13604810600982347
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences. Dramas of mediating public disputes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2013). How much do we care about progressive and radical practice? Crios (Critica Degli Ordinamenti Spaziali), (1), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2014, May 19–23). On the evolution of a critical pragmatism. Paper prepared for the Workshop on the Evolution of Planning Thought, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J., & Stitzel, D. (1989). Beyond neutrality: The possibilities of activist mediation in public sector conflicts. Negotiation Journal, 5(3), 251–264. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.1989.tb00521.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Zamor, J.-C. (2009). Social equity in urban development: The Leipzig experience. International Review of Public Administration, 14(2), 1–11. doi:10.1080/12294659.2009.10805151
   Google Scholar
• Gasparre, A. (2011). Emerging networks of organized urban poor: Restructuring the engagement with government toward the inclusion of the excluded. Voluntas, 22(4), 779–810. doi:10.1007/s11266-010-9180-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gills, B. K., & Gray, K. (2012). People power in the era of global crisis: Rebellion, resistance, and liberation. Third World Quarterly, 33(2), 205–224. doi:10.1080/01436597.2012.664897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, S., & Vigar, G. (2008). Community influence and the contemporary local state. Potentials and contradictions in the neo-liberal city. City, 12(1), 64–78. doi:10.1080/13604810801933545
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2009). Direct action: An ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, J., & Corijn, E. (2005). Reclaiming urbanity: Indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting. Urban Studies, 42(3), 503–526. doi:10.1080/00420980500035436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardina, D., & Malott, O. W. (1996). Strategies for the empowerment of low income consumers on community-based planning boards. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 7(2), 43–61. doi:10.1300/J059v07n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2000). Going around the back? Complex networks and informal action in local planning processes. Environment and Planning A, 32(1), 33–54. doi:10.1068/a321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, R. (2011). The transition companion. Making your community more resilient in uncertain times. Totnes, Devon: Green Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hum, T. (2010). Planning in neighborhoods with multiple publics: Opportunities and challenges for community-based nonprofit organizations. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(4), 461–477. doi:10.1177/0739456X10368700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysing, E., & Olsson, J. (2011). Who greens the northern light? Green inside activists in local environmental governing in Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(4), 693–708. doi:10.1068/c10114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INURA. (2003). An alternative urban world is possible: A declaration for urban research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 952–955. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, R. (2012). Kritisk-alternative initiativ i norsk byplanlegging. En studie av Byutviklingens År i Tromsø og Nyhavna-Regjeringen i Trondheim (PhD thesis, the Department of Sociology, Political Science and Community Planning). University of Tromsø, Tromsø.
   Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N. (2013). Toward an equity-oriented planning practice in the United States. In N. Carmon & S. S. Fainstein (Eds.), Policy, planning, and people. Promoting justice in urban development (pp. 123–140). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. L. (2007). Politisk urbanitet. Projekter, planer, protester og Supertanker på Krøyers Plads (Political urbanity. Projects, plans, protests and supertanker at Krøyers Plads] (PhD dissertation). Department of Environmental, Social and Spatial Change, Roskilde University (RUC), Roskilde.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. L. (2010, January 29). Vague spaces – recognizing other urbanities in the city. Contribution to the exhibition Micronomics. Brussels: City Mine(d).
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., & Forester, J. (2015). Conflict, improvisation, governance: Street level practices for urban democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leal, P. A. (2010). Participation: The ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. In A. Cornwall & D. Eade (Eds.), Deconstructing development discourse buzzwords and fuzzwords (pp. 89–100). Rugby, UK: Practical Action and Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Leavitt, J., & Yonder, A. (2013). Planning through the lens of everyday life: From local to global. In I. Boniburini, J. Le Maire, L. Moretto, & H. Smith (Eds.), The city as a common good: Urban planning and the right to the city (pp. 195–220). Les Cahiers d’Architecture la Cambre-Horta No. 9. Brussels: La Lettre Volée.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, U., & Keil, R. (2007). From possible urban worlds to the contested metropolis. Research and action in the age of urban neoliberalism. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. S. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neoliberalism. Urban frontiers (pp. 291–310). London: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. (2013). Sense of place and place-based activism in the neoliberal city: The case of ‘weird’ resistance. City, 17(1), 52–67. doi:10.1080/13604813.2012.754186
   Google Scholar
• Loopmans, M., & Dirckx, T. (2012). Neoliberal urban movements? A geography of conflict and mobilisation over urban renaissance in Antwerp, Belgium. In T. Taşan-Kok & G. Baeten (Eds.), Contradictions of neoliberal planning (pp. 99–116). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S., & Domingo-Price, M. L. (2012). The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), 497–512. doi:10.1177/0956247812456125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia, M. (1996). NGOs as mediators. Their role in expertise, language and institutional exemption in urban development planning (DPU Working Paper No. 77). London: Bartlett Development Planning Unit, UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, K. (2013). Academics and social movements: Knowing our place, making our space. ACME, 12(1), 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (1998). The changing scope of action in urban politics: New opportunities for local initiatives and movements. In R. Wolff, A. Schneider, C. Schmid, P. Klaus, A. Hofer, & H. Hitz (Eds.), Possible urban worlds. Urban strategies at the end of the 20th century (pp. 66–75). INURA, Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (2009). The ‘right to the city’ in the context of shifting mottos of urban social movements. City, 13(2–3), 362–374. doi:10.1080/13604810902982755
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (2013). First world urban activism: Beyond austerity urbanism and creative city politics. City, 17(1), 5–19. doi:10.1080/13604813.2013.757417
   Google Scholar
• Modlich, R. (2012). Women Plan Toronto (1985-2000) and Toronto Women’s City Alliance (2004 – and struggling on): Experiences and lessons. Universitas Forum, 3(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W. J. (2003). Forging a ‘new’ organizational infrastructure for Los Angeles’ progressive community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 881–896. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00489.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy, J., & Colomb, C. (2013). Struggling for the right to the (creative) city in Berlin and Hamburg: New urban social movements, new ‘spaces of hope’? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1816–1838. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01115.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J. (2009). The power of the inside activist: Understanding policy change by empowering the advocacy coalition framework (ACF). Planning Theory and Practice, 10(2), 167–187. doi:10.1080/14649350902884425
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., & Hysing, E. (2012). Theorizing inside activism: Understanding policymaking and policy change from below. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 257–273. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.677123
   Google Scholar
• Patel, S., & Arputham, J. (2007). An offer of partnership or a promise of conflict in Dharavi, Mumbai? Environment and Urbanization, 19(2), 501–508. doi:10.1177/0956247807082832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., & Mitlin, D. (2004). Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, The National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan. In D. Mitlin & D. Satterthwaite (Eds.), Empowering squatter citizen. Local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction (pp. 216–241). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Petropoulou, C. (2014). Crisis, right to the city movements and the question of spontaneity: Athens and Mexico City. City, 18(4–5), 563–572. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.939478
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. London: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse, R. (2009). Abahlali baseMjondolo and the struggle for the city in Durban, South Africa. Cidades, 6(9), 241–270. Retrieved from 29 March, 2016, http://revista.fct.unesp.br/index.php.revistacidades/article/viewFile/552/584
   Google Scholar
• Pruijt, H. (2013). The logic of urban squatting. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1), 19–45. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, K. M. (2008). Planning, hope, and struggle in the wake of Katrina: Ken Reardon on the New Orleans Planning Initiative (Ken Reardon in conversation with John Forester, in Interfaces). Planning Theory and Practice, 9(4), 518–540. doi:10.1080/14649350802481363
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2011). Neo-liberal urban planning policies: A literature survey 1990-2010. Progress in Planning, 76(4), 147–199. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2013). Reviving critical planning theory. Dealing with pressure, neo-liberalism and responsibility in communicative planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1998). The death of modernist planning: Radical praxis for a postmodern age. In M. Douglass & J. Friedmann (Eds.), Cities for citizens. Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age (pp. 163–184). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L., & Attili, G. (2014). Changing the lens: Film as action research and therapeutic planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), 19–29. doi:10.1177/0739456X13516499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, G. F. (2013). Planning in the shadows. Unauthorized immigrants in Postville. Progressive Planning Magazine, ( 194, Winter), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Shakir, U. (2008). An alternative tale of the city: Toronto and the Alternative Planning Group. Progressive Planning Magazine, (Issue 177, Fall). Retrieved April 29, 2014, from http://www.plannersnetwork.org/2008/10/an-alternative-tale-of-the-city-toronto-and-the-alternative-planning-group
   Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M. (2012). The role of the planning scholar: Research, conflict, and social change. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 147–159. doi:10.1177/0739456X12440729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. M., Taylor, H. L., & Crawford, C. (2008). The role of citizen participation and action research principles in main street revitalization: An analysis of a local planning project. Action Research, 6(1), 69–93. doi:10.1177/1476750307083725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A., & Kasdan, A. (2013). Inserting community perspective research into public housing policy discourse: The right to the city Alliance’s ‘We call these projects home’. Cities, 35, 327–334. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2011). The transition town network: A review of current evolutions and renaissance. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 99–105. doi:10.1080/14742837.2011.545229
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2004). ‘Whose streets?’ Urban social movements and the politicization of space. Public, 29(Summer), 156–167. Retrieved from 29 March, 2016, public.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/public/article/viewFile/30361/27889
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, J. (2012). Deliberation or what? A study of activist participation on social networking sites. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(2), 103–115. doi:10.1504/IJEG.2012.049787
   Google Scholar
• Theodore, N., & Martin, N. (2007). Migrant civil society: New voices in the struggle over community development. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(3), 269–287. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapenberg Frick, K. (2013). The actions of discontent. Tea party and property rights activists pushing back against regional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(3), 190–200. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.885312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. (2009). An in memoriam for the just city of Amsterdam. City, 13(2–3), 347–361. doi:10.1080/13604810902982813
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, L. (2007). Postcolonial planning: The Alternative Planning Group and the transformation of social planning in Toronto at the turn of the 21st century (PhD thesis). Toronto: Graduate Program in Environmental Studies, York University.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, T. (2009). For the equitable city yet to come. Planning Theory and Practice, 10(1), 65–83. doi:10.1080/14649350802661725
   Google Scholar