Building a cross-border territorial strategy between four countries: wishful thinking?

References

• Anderson, A., & Wever, E. (2003). Borders, border regions and economic integration: One world, ready or not. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 18(1), 27–38. doi:10.1080/08865655.2003.9695599
   Google Scholar
• Auburtin, E. (2012). The role of city networks in cross-border metropolitan governance. In C. Sohn (Eds.), Luxembourg an emerging cross-border metropolitan region (pp. 229–247). Brussels: PIE. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. (2005). Europe constitution frontière [ Europe, Constitution, Border]. Bègles: Editions du Passant.
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2001). Debordering the world of states: Towards a multi-level system in Europe and a multi-polity system in North America? Insights from border regions. European Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 175–209. doi:10.1177/1354066101007002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2004). From ‘spaces of place’ to ‘spaces of flows’? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 530–548. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., & Clement, N. (2000). Cross-border cooperation in Europe: Historical development, institutionalization and contrasts to North America. Journal of Borderland Studies, 15(1), 15–53. doi:10.1080/08865655.2000.9695541
   Google Scholar
• Bufon, M. (2011). Cross-border policies and spatial and social integration: Between challenges and problems. European Spatial Research and Policy, 18(2), 29–45. doi:10.2478/v10105-011-0011-2
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., Evrard, E., & Schultz, C. (2012). On the territoriality of cross-border cooperation: “Institutional mapping” in a multi-level context. European Planning Studies, 20(6), 961–980. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.673563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., Durand, F., Sohn, C., & Walther, O. (2013). Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: Towards a functional typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 221–237. doi:10.1080/08865655.2013.854654
   Google Scholar
• De Boe, P., Grasland, C. and Healy, A., (1999). Spatial Integration. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning 14, Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. (2008). Breaking the deadlock: Lessons from cross-border spatial projects in Flanders and the Netherlands. disP – The Planning Review, 44(172), 48–61. doi:10.1080/02513625.2008.10557002
   Google Scholar
• Donnan, H., & Wilson, T. (2001). Borders. Frontiers of identity, nation and state. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Dörry, S., & Decoville, A. (2013). Governance and transportation policy networks in the cross-border metropolitan region of Luxembourg: A social network analysis. European Urban and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, P., Böhme, K., & Zaucha, J. (2014). EU territory and policy-making: From words to deeds to promote policy integration (debate article). European Journal of Spatial Development. Retrieved from http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/debate201401.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. (2014). Challenges of cross-border spatial planning in the metropolitan regions of Luxembourg and Lille. Planning Practice & Research, 29(2), 113–132. doi:10.1080/02697459.2014.896148
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F. (2015). Theoretical framework of the cross-border space production – The case of the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk–Tournai. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 30(3), 309–328. doi:10.1080/08865655.2015.1066701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Lamour, C. (2014). Cross-border metropolitan governance: The multi-faceted state power – The case study of the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai. Space and Polity, 18(3), 197–214. doi:10.1080/13562576.2014.957041
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2010). Metroborder: Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions (Final Report), Luxembourg. Retrieved from http//www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_TargetedAnalyses/metroborder.html
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2013). Ulysses. Using applied research results from ESPON as a yardstick for cross-border spatial development planning (Final Report), Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/TargetedAnalyses/ULYSSES/Ulysses_Final_Report_2013_01_25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1999). ESDP – European spatial development perspective. Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communitie.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). Green paper on territorial cohesion turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels: Official Publications of the European Communitiesm.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Agenda territorial 2020 – Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development, Gödöllő.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E. (2016). The European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC): Towards a supraregional scale of governance in the greater region SaarLorLux? Geopolitics, 1–25. doi:10.1080/14650045.2015.1104667
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E., & Schulz, C. (2015). L'ambition métropolitaine : clé vers un aménagement du territoire transfrontalier en Grande Région SaarLorLux? L'Information géographique, 3(79), 54–78. doi:10.3917/lig.793.0054
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age? Milton Park. Abingdon: Routeledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, C. (2015). Spatial governance across borders revisited: Organizational forms and spatial planning in metropolitan cross-border regions. European Planning Studies, 23(5), 849–870. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.887661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gløersen, E., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., & Dubois, A. (2007). Polycentricity in transnational planning initiatives: ESDP applied or ESDP reinvented? Planning Practice and Research, 22(3), 417–437. doi:10.1080/02697450701666761
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. A. (2000). Cross-border planning and cooperation. In P. Ganster (Eds.), The U.S. Mexican border environment a road map to sustainable 2020 (pp. 139–161). San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. A., & Sohn, C. (2014). The cross-border metropolis in a global age: A conceptual model and empirical evidence from the US–Mexico and European border regions. Global Society, 28(4), 441–461. doi:10.1080/13600826.2014.948539
   Google Scholar
• Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers Responsible For Spatial Planning and Territorial Development. (2011). Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Gödöllö, 19 May. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/what/territorial-cohesion/territorial_agenda_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (2014). Spatial planning in cross-border regions: A systems theoretical perspective. Planning Theory. doi:10.1177/1473095214547149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean, Y., & Baudelle, G. (2010). L’Europe: Aménager les territoires [ Europe: Planning the territories]. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2009). Planning cultures in Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Knippschild, R. (2011). Cross-border spatial planning: Understanding, designing and managing cooperation processes in the German–Polish–Czech borderland. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 629–645. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippschild, R., & Wiechmann, T. (2012). Supraregional partnerships in large cross-border areas – Towards a new category of space in Europe? Planning, Practice and Research, 27(3), 297–314. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.670933
   Google Scholar
• Kramsch, O., & Hooper, B. (2004). Introduction. In O. Kramsch, & B. Hooper (Eds.), Cross-border governance in the European Union (pp. 1–21). London: Routledgem.
   Google Scholar
• Monfort, P. (2009). Regional convergence, growth and interpersonal inequalities across EU. Brussels: Directorate General Regional Policy European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, P. (2009). Uses and abuses of the concept of integration. In C. Rumford (Ed.), The Sage handbook of European studies (pp. 227–244). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, J., & Durand, F. (2014). Political rescaling and metropolitan governance in cross-border regions/comparing the cross-border metropolitan areas of Lille and Luxembourg. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), 104–122. doi:10.1177/0969776411431103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996). Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems and planning projects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peña, S. (2007). Cross-border planning at the U.S.–Mexico border: An institutional approach. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 22(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/08865655.2007.9695666
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 153–171. doi:10.1177/0969776403010002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007). Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 861–879. doi:10.1068/c60m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyrony, J., & Denert, O. (2012). Planning for cross-border territories: The role played by spatial information. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 70(3), 229–240. doi:10.1007/s13147-012-0156-0
   Google Scholar
• Reitel, B. (2013). Border temporality and space integration in the European trans-border agglomeration of Basel. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 239–256. doi:10.1080/08865655.2013.854657
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. (2014). Modelling cross-border integration: The role of borders as a resource. Geopolitics, 19(3), 587–608. doi:10.1080/14650045.2014.913029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., Decoville, A., Durand, F., & Lamour, C. (2014). Dynamiques socio-spatiales du réseau de villes Tonicités [Socio-spatial dynamics of the cities network Tonicités].Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., Reitel, B., & Walther, O. (2009). Cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: The case of Luxembourg, Basel, and Geneva. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 922–939. doi:10.1068/c0893r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spatial Foresight. (2015). Assessment of territorial cohesion and the territorial agenda 2020 of the European Union, Luxembourg (68 p.).
   Google Scholar
• STATEC. (2014). Le Luxembourg en chiffres [Luxembourg in figures]. Luxembourg: STATEC.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, S., & Nordlund, C. (2015). The building blocks of a Euroregion: Novel metrics to measure cross-border integration. Journal of European Integration, 37(3), 371–389. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.968568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topaloglou, L., Kalliora, D., Manetos, P., & Petrakos, G. (2005). A border regions typology in the enlarged European Union. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 20(2), 67–89. doi:10.1080/08865655.2005.9695644
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtum, H. (2000). An overview of European geographical research on borders and border regions. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 15(1), 57–83. doi:10.1080/08865655.2000.9695542
   Google Scholar