In pursuit of productive conflict in strategic planning: project identification

References

• Abels, M. (1989). Strategic planning. Public Administration Review, 49, 294–295. doi:10.2307/977017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2001). How to proceed from image and discourse to action: As applied to the Flemish diamond. Urban Studies, 38, 733–745. doi:10.1080/00420980120035312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2006a). Bridge the gap: From spatial planning to strategic projects. European Planning Studies, 14, 1487–1500. doi:10.1080/09654310600852464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2006b). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1149–1170. doi:10.1068/a37304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2010). More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37, 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2013). Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective. Planning Theory, 12, 46–63. doi:10.1177/1473095212452722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2015). Ingredients for a more radical strategic spatial planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42, 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., & Balducci, A. (2013). Practicing strategic planning: In search of critical features to explain the strategic character of plans. disP – The Planning Review, 49, 16–27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003). Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 113–129. doi:10.1080/01944360308976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103. doi:10.1111/j.1475–5661.2011.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, S., & Stafford, I. (2009). Evaluating decision making procedures for Regional Funding Allocations: A preliminary analysis of six English regions. Bristol: University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, M. (2007). Berlin-Adlershof: Local steps into global networks. In W. Salet & E. Gualini (Eds.), Framing strategic urban projects: Learning from current experiences in European urban regions (pp. 115–145). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., & Mäntysalo, R. (2010). Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice-the case of Finland. Planning Theory, 9, 333–350. doi:10.1177/1473095210373684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Hincks, S., & Sherriff, G. (2010). Getting involved in plan making: Participation and stakeholder involvement in local and regional spatial strategies in England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 574–594. doi:10.1068/c0972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Wong, C. (2013). The delusion of strategic spatial planning: What’s left after the labour government’s English regional experiment? Planning Practice and Research, 28, 83–103. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.694314
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A. (2003). Policies, plans and projects: Governing the city-region of Milan. disP – The Planning Review, 39, 59–70. doi:10.1080/02513625.2003.10556835
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., Fedeli, V., & Pasqui, G. (Eds.). (2011). Strategic planning for contemporary urban regions: City of cities: A project for milan. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Banai, R. (2013). Plan vs project dilemma revisited: A progress review of urban and regional studies literature. Urban Studies, 50, 807–824. doi:10.1177/0042098012458548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Hardill, I., Baker, M., & Budd, L. (2006). The rise of the English regions: An introduction. In I. Hardill, P. Benneworth, M. Baker, & L. Budd (Eds.), The rise of the English regions? (pp. 3–21). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. (2001). Spatial planning in the light of Nordic eccentricity. Built Environment (1978–), 27, 295–303. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23288468
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. (2003). Discursive European integration: The case of Nordic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 74, 11–29. doi:10.3828/tpr.74.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Booher, D. E., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 221–236. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, R., & Gaffikin, F. (2007). Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Planning Theory, 6, 282–313. doi:10.1177/1473095207082036
   Google Scholar
• Breheny, M. J. (1988). The planning paradox: Strategic issues and pragmatic responses in the south of England. Built Environment (1978–), 14, 225–240. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23286586
   Google Scholar
• Breheny, M. J. (1991). The renaissance of strategic planning? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 18, 233–249. doi:10.1068/b180233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehny, M., & Hall, P. (1984). The strange death of strategic planning and the victory of the know-nothing school. Built Environment (1978–), 10, 95–99. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23286283
   Google Scholar
• British Mountaineering Council, Campaign to Protect Rural England, Council for National Parks, Friends of the Earth, Friends of the Peak District, North West Transport Activists Roundtable, & the Ramblers. (2007). Public inquiries into the A57-A28 Mottram-Tintwistle Bypass and Glossop spur – proof of evidence on the Regional Funding Allocation process. Manchester: North West Transport Activists Roundtable.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1988). Initiation of strategic planning by governments. Public Administration Review, 48, 995–1004. doi:10.2307/976996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2006). Town and country planning in the UK (14th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2006). Letter to the North West Regional Assembly and Regional Development Agency [Online]. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20081205143343/http://dft.gov.uk/pgr/regional/strategy/rfa/rfa1/response1/lettertothenorthwestregional3775
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000). Planning policy guidance note 11: Regional planning. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., & Xu, J. (2016). Consensus building in group decision making: Searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 634–649. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hakim, S. (1978). The structure and dynamics of consensus decision-making. Man, 13, 55–71. doi:10.2307/2801065
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1998). Deliberation and constitution making. In J. Elster (Ed.), Deliberative democracy (pp. 97–122). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Examination in Public Panel. (2007). North West draft regional spatial strategy: Examination in public – report of the panel. Bristol: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 451–478. doi:10.1177/107808740003500401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2000). The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 15, 299–318. doi:10.1080/713691907
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & and Van der Valk, A. (1994). Rule and order: Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1993). Critical theory, public policy and planning practice: Toward a critical pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2004). Strategic spatial planning and the longer range. Planning Theory and Practice, 5, 49–67. doi:10.1080/1464935042000185062
   Google Scholar
• Government Office for the North West. (2008). North West of England plan: Regional spatial strategy to 2021. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (Ed.). (2015). Planning and conflict: Critical perspectives on contentious urban developments. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, C. (2012). Revisiting the ungovernability debate: Regional governance and sprawl in the USA and UK. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36, 817–830. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, T. L., & Stein, S. M. (1995). Out of the postmodern abyss: Preserving the rationale for liberal planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 233–244. doi:10.1177/0739456X9501400401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N. (2002). Collaborative planning: From theoretical foundations to practice forms. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 21–43). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2013). Configuring the new ‘regional world’: On being caught between territory and networks. Regional Studies, 47, 55–74. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.644239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2010). The new spatial planning: Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Counsell, D. (2004). Regions, spatial strategies and sustainable development. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63, 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422X602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1996a). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 23, 217–234. doi:10.1068/b230217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1996b). Consensus-building across difficult divisions: New approaches to collaborative strategy making. Planning Practice and Research, 11, 207–216. doi:10.1080/02697459650036350
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2003a). The revival of strategic spatial planning in Europe. In P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte, & B. Needham (Eds.), Making strategic spatial plans: Innovation in Europe (pp. 3–19). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2003b). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2, 101–123. doi:10.1177/14730952030022002
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial. European Planning Studies, 14, 525–546. doi:10.1080/09654310500421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2009). In search of the “strategic” in spatial strategy making. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 439–457. doi:10.1080/14649350903417191
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2013). Comment on Albrechts and Balducci “practicing strategic planning”. disP – The Planning Review, 49, 48–50. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., & Hillier, J. (1996). Communicative micropolitics: A story of claims and discourses. International Planning Studies, 1, 165–184. doi:10.1080/13563479608721650
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Khakee, A., Motte, A., & Needham, B. (Eds.). (2003). Making strategic spatial plans: Innovation in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (1993). To boldly go where no planners have ever  …  . Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, 89–113. doi:10.1068/d110089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2003). Agonizing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be real. Planning Theory, 2, 37–59. doi:10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2011). Strategic navigation across multiple planes: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review, 82, 503–527. doi:10.3828/tpr.2011.30
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2004). Planning and Compulsory purchase Act 2004. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. (2010). The emancipatory limits of participation in planning: Equity and power in deliberative plan-making in Perth, Western Australia. Town Planning Review, 81, 55–81. doi:10.3828/tpr.2009.24
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (1998). Memorandum by Government Office for the North West (H 183) [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmselect/cmenvtra/495-v/8031802.htm
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2011). Local and regional transport planning [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtran/473/47308.htm
   Google Scholar
• Houston, J. (2010, November 21). New lease of life promised for Runcorn Widnes Bridge. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-11799771
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (Eds.). (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, D. (1995). Projects, politics and professionals: Alternative approaches for project identification and project planning. Agricultural Systems, 47, 211–233. doi:10.1016/0308-521X(94)P4412-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 369–377. doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 333–342. doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, 183–189. doi:10.1177/0739456X9501400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 460–472. doi:10.1080/01944369608975712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (2004). Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3, 5–20. doi:10.1177/1473095204042315
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999a). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 412–423. doi:10.1080/01944369908976071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999b). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, 9–26. doi:10.1080/01944369908976031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. (2007). Consensus and conflict in policy networks: Too much or too little? In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 133–152). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R. (2013). Strategic planning: A chance for spatial innovation and creativity. disP – The Planning Review, 49, 28–31. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2002). Hope, passion, politics. In M. Zournazi (Ed.), Hope (pp. 122–149). Sydney: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, S., & Game, C. (1991). English metropolitan governance since abolition: An evaluation of the abolition of the English metropolitan county councils. Public Administration, 69, 141–170. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9299.1991.tb00788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Government Chronicle. (2006). Major transport schemes recommended to government: First time region sets its own priorities. Retrieved from http://www.lgcplus.com/major-transport-schemes-recommended-to-government-first-time-region-sets-its-own-priorities/516676.article
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R. (2013). Coping with the paradox of strategic spatial planning. disP – The Planning Review, 49, 51–52. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859009
   Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. (2002). Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 237–253. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2003). English regional planning: Recent progress and current government proposals. Planning Practice and Research, 18, 81–93. doi:10.1080/0269745032000132655
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. (2013). Transport and the spatial strategy. In C. Swain, T. Marshall, & T. Baden (Eds.), English regional planning 2000–2010: Lessons for the future (pp. 54–73). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. L. (2014). The big lie of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review, 92, 3–8. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2014/01/the-big-lie-of-strategic-planning
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastop, H. (1997). Performance in Dutch spatial planning: An introduction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 807–813. doi:10.1068/b240807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastop, H. (2000). Institutional requirements for new local, national and multinational planning realities in Europe. In H. Lithwick & Y. Gradus (Eds.), Developing frontier cities: Global perspectives-regional contexts (pp. 45–64). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Mastop, H., & Faludi, A. (1997). Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 815–832. doi:10.1068/b240815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastop, H., & Needham, B. (1997). Performance studies in spatial planning: The state of the art. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 881–888. doi:10.1068/b240881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastop, H., & Postuma, R. (1991). Key notions underlying Dutch strategic planning. Built Environment (1978–), 17, 53–60. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23286790
   Google Scholar
• Mazza, L. (2013). If strategic planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing. disP – The Planning Review, 49, 40–42. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M. (2001). Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33, 195–217. doi:10.1068/a3355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersey Gateway. (2016). A new and improved route over the Mersey [online]. Retrieved from http://www.merseygateway.co.uk/about-the-mersey-gateway-project/a-new-and-improved-route-over-the-mersey/
   Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: Situating radical planning in the global south. Planning Theory, 8, 32–50. doi:10.1177/1473095208099297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morphet, J. (2011). Effective practice in spatial planning. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66, 745–758. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40971349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, B., Zwanikken, T., & Faludi, A. (1997). Strategies for improving the performance of planning: Some empirical research. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 871–880. doi:10.1068/b240871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2003). Images as institution builders: Metropolitan planning in Madrid. In P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte, & B. Needham (Eds.), Making strategic spatial plans: Innovation in Europe (pp. 77–94). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• New Civil Engineer. (2010). Yorkshire and Humber 2010: The Smeaton award for excellence [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.nce.co.uk/features/yorkshire-and-humber-2010-the-smeaton-award-for-excellence/5215597.article
   Google Scholar
• North West Regional Assembly. (2006). The North West plan: Submitted draft regional spatial strategy for the North West of England. Wigan: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North West Regional Assembly & Northwest Regional Development Agency. (2006). Regional funding allocations: The advice of the North West region. Wigan: NWRA.
   Google Scholar
• North West Regional Leaders Board & Northwest Regional Development Agency. (2009). Regional funding advice: The advice of the North West region. Wigan: NWRA.
   Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1987). A strategic management process for public and third-sector organizations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53, 44–57. doi:10.1080/01944368708976634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. (2004). Planning policy statement 11: Regional Spatial Strategies. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., Albrechts, L., & Van den Broeck, J. (2011). Strategic spatial planning through strategic projects. In S. Oosterlynck, J. Van den Broeck, L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert, & A. Verhetsel (Eds.), Strategic spatial projects: Catalysts for change (pp. 1–13). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., Van den Broeck, J., Albrechts, L., Moulaert, F., & Verhetsel, A. (Eds.). (2011). Strategic spatial projects: Catalysts for change. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., & Ayres, S. (2006). New patterns of governance in the English region: Assessing their implications for spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 909–927. doi:10.1068/c49m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., & Ayres, S. (2007). Emerging patterns of governance in the English regions: The role of regional assemblies. Regional Studies, 41, 699–712. doi:10.1080/00343400600929044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., & Ayres, S. (2009). Governance in the English regions: The role of the regional development agencies. Urban Studies, 46, 537–557. doi:10.1177/0042098008100994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., Mawson, J., & Ayres, S. (2008). Regional governance in England: A changing role for the Government’s Regional Offices? Public Administration, 86, 443–463. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00699.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persona Associates. (2009). The Mersey gateway public inquiry [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.merseygateway.co.uk/publicinquirydocs/
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8, 140–165. doi:10.1177/1473095209102232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringli, H. (2003). Plan-making in the Zürich region. In P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte, & B. Needham (Eds.), Making strategic spatial plans: Innovation in Europe (pp. 115–133). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rivolin, U. J. (2008). Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice & Research, 23, 167–186. doi:10.1080/02697450802327081
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., & Baker, M. (2006). Regions and regional identity. In I. Hardill, P. Benneworth, M. Baker, & L. Budd (Eds.), The rise of the English regions? (pp. 22–43). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. Z. (1989). Some wise and mistaken assumptions about conflict and negotiation. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 195–209. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (1994). Communicative planning theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sartorio, F. S. (2005). Strategic spatial planning: A historical review of approaches, its recent revival, and an overview of the state of the art in Italy. disP – The Planning Review, 41, 26–40. doi:10.1080/02513625.2005.10556930
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, B. B. (1984). Towards responsibility: Public policy in concept and practice. In E. J. Clay & B. B. Schaffer (Eds.), Room for manoeuvre: An exploration of public policy in agricultural and rural development (pp. 142–190). London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, R. D. (1985). The development of strategic policy planning in Victoria, Australia: A review. Town Planning Review, 56, 42–69. doi:10.3828/tpr.56.1.p138q16330n56w60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, C. (2013). Value of independent testing. In C. Swain, T. Marshall, & T. Baden (Eds.), English regional planning 2000–2010: Lessons for the future (pp. 95–112). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (1998). Urban planning theory since 1945. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Allmendinger, P. (1998). Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1975–1989. doi:10.1068/a301975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R., & Dimitriou, H. T. (2007). Conclusions. In H. T. Dimitriou & R. Thompson (Eds.), Strategic planning for regional development in the UK: A review of principles and practices (pp. 338–350). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urfalino, P. (2010). Deciding as bringing deliberation to a close. Social Science Information, 49, 111–140. doi:10.1177/0539018409354812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urfalino, P. (2014). The rule of non-opposition: Opening up decision-making by consensus. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22, 320–341. doi:10.1111/jopp.12037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Belt, M. (Ed.). (2004). Mediated modeling: A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voogd, H. (2001). Social dilemmas and the communicative planning paradox. Town Planning Review, 72, 77–95. Rerieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40111826
   Google Scholar
• Wannop, U. (1995). The regional imperative: Regional planning and governance in Britain, Europe and the United States. London: Regional Studies Association/Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Wannop, U., & Cherry, G. E. (1994). The development of regional planning in the United Kingdom. Planning Perspectives, 9, 29–60. doi:10.1080/02665439408725787
   Google Scholar
• Willhoite, F. H. (1963). Political order and consensus: A continuing problem. The Western Political Quarterly, 16, 294–304. doi:10.2307/444944
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G., & Baker, M. (2007). Strategic and regional planning in the North West. In H. T. Dimitriou & R. Thompson (Eds.), Strategic planning for regional development in the UK: A review of principles and practices (pp. 291–315). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., & Baker, M. (2006). The North West: Cultural coherence and institutional fragmentation. In I. Hardill, P. Benneworth, M. Baker, & L. Budd (Eds.), The rise of the English regions? (pp. 120–136). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, I. (2011). Viewpoint: In search of strategic sites: North West England, 1990–2010. Town Planning Review, 82, i–ix. doi:10.3828/tpr.2011.21
   Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O., & Huxley, M. (2000). Debating dominance and relevance: Notes on the ‘communicative turn’ in planning theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 907–913. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R., & Sly, F. (2011). Portrait of the North West. Regional Trends, 43, 169–198. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/c28d757f4eade3a8ba7abe77274b2770/1?pq-origsite=gscholar doi: 10.1057/rt.2011.6
   Google Scholar
• Zavattaro, S. M. (2014). Critical imagination: Expanding consensual decision-making processes in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 36, 7–24. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806360101
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2014). The application of strategic spatial planning under regionalist and localist approaches to public policy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2015). Reflections on the three schools of thought on strategic spatial planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 30, 132–148. doi:10.1177/0885412214562428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. (2016). Exploring new systems of regionalism: An English case study. Cities, 150, 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., & Baker, M. (2015). Building consensus for network power? Some reflections on strategic spatial planning in the North West region of England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, doi:10.1177/0263774X15614690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., & Baker, M. (in press). Strategic spatial planning under regime governance and localism: Experiences from the North West of England. Town Planning Review.
   Google Scholar