Developing cross-industry innovation capability: regional drivers and indicators within firms

References

• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016). Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy, 45(4), 844–856. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). The geography of innovation. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Smart specialisation: Sources for new path development in a peripheral manufacturing region. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2015_011.html
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2009). Designing social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A., & Martin, R. (2007). Editorial: Constructing an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 537–548. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, E. A. N., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2012). Embedded and disembedded practice in the firm-place nexus: A study of two world-leading manufacturers of ski equipment in the Lillehammer ski cluster. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(2), 177–194. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2012.00403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Martin, H. (2015). Path renewal in old industrial regions: Possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies, 49(5), 850–865. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.979321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2012). Relatedness, transversality and public policy in innovative regions. European Planning Studies, 20(11), 1889–1907. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.723426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5–15. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-5009-3
   Google Scholar
• Enkel, E., & Gassmann, O. (2010). Creative imitation: Exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 256–270. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00591.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). European technology platform. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?pg=etp
   Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, P. H., Mifflin, K. E., Miller, D., & Whitney, J. O. (2000). Strategy integration: Competing in the age of capabilities. California Management Review, 42(3), 118–147. doi:10.2307/41166045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760–774. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2010). Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: Case studies of two regional industries in Norway. European Planning Studies, 18(12), 1993–2008. doi:10.1080/09654313.2010.516523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Nilsson, M. (2013). Combined innovation policy: Linking scientific and practical knowledge in innovation systems. European Planning Studies, 21(12), 1919–1936. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2014). Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2014_017.html
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680–693. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377–400. doi:10.1142/S1363919601000427
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2012). Knowledge bases and the geography of innovation. Sweden: Media-Tryck, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2013). Differentiated knowledge bases and the nature of innovation networks. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1418–1436. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.755836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 395–437. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P. (2001). The firm in economic geography. Economic Geography, 77(4), 329–344. doi:10.2307/3594104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., & Zukauskaite, E. (2014). Institutional conditions and innovation systems: On the impact of regional policy on firms in different sectors. Regional Studies, 48(1), 127–138. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.649004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers, C. (2011). Intermediaries in regional innovation systems: Role and challenges for policy. In P. Cooke (Ed.), Handbook of regional innovation and growth (pp. 467–481). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Praeger, D. (2007). Our love of sewers: A lesson in path dependence. Retrieved from https://progressivehistorians.wordpress.com/2007/10/page/4/
   Google Scholar
• Rathe, K., & Witt, U. (2001). The nature of the firm – static versus developmental interpretations. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 331–351. doi:10.1023/A:1014051112548
   Google Scholar
• Schienstock, G. (2007). From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledge-based economy. Current Sociology, 55(1), 92–109. doi:10.1177/0011392107070136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2016a). Greatest rise in unemployment among those with higher education. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/en/arbeid-og-lonn/statistikker/regledig/aar/2016-01-19#content
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2016b). Population and population changes, 1.January 2016. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/folkemengde/aar-per-1-januar/2016-02-19?fane=tabell&sort=nummer&tabell=256010
   Google Scholar
• Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709. doi:10.5465/AMR.2009.44885978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537–556. doi:10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Grillitsch, M. (2014). Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwsre/sre-disc-2014_07.html
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2015). External “energy” for regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2015_047.html
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762. doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar