Outsmarting geography: implementing territorial innovation strategies in sparsely populated regions

References

• Asheim, B., & Grillitsch, M. (2015). Smart specialisation: Sources for new path development in a peripheral manufacturing region. Lund: Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy – a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report, prepared at the request of the European Commissioner for Regional Policy, Danuta Hübner, European Commission, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart experimentation. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 58(1), 33–49. doi: 10.1515/zfw.2014.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2008). Constructing regional advantage: Related variety and regional innovation policy (Report for the Dutch Scientific Council for Government Policy). Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2014). Constructing regional advantage and smart specialisation: Comparison of two European policy concepts. Scienze Regionali, 13(1), 51–68. doi: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001004
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2007). Related variety and regional growth in Italy. Science and Technology Policy Research, 62, 1–24. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7372149.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, G., & Atterton, J. (2012). Entrepreneurial in-migration and neoendogenous rural development. Rural Sociology, 77(2), 254–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00079.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., & Boschma, R. (2012). Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: The proximity paradox. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(2), 409–433. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, D. B., & Carson, D. A. (2014). Local economies of mobility in sparsely populated areas: Cases from Australia’s spine. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 340–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Content, J., & Frenken, K. (2016). Related variety and economic development: A literature review. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2097–2112. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2016). The virtues of variety in regional innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 1. doi: 10.1186/s40852-016-0036-x
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Roto, J. (2012). Making the best of Europe’s sparsely populated areas – on making geographic specificity a driver for territorial development in Europe (Nordregio Working Paper. 15).
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities in the global economy: A triple helix of university–industry–government relations. London: Cassell Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation – opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. H. (2011). Smart specialisation from academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation. Lausanne: EPFL.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Goenaga, X. (2013). The goals of smart specialisation. JRC Scientific and Policy Report, S3 Policy Brief Series No. 01/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., & Johnston, A. (2009). Knowledge networks in an uncompetitive region: SME innovation and growth. Growth and Change, 40(2), 227–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirat, T., & Lung, Y. (1999). Innovation and proximity: Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 27–38. doi: 10.1177/096977649900600103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice – leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A., & Lorentzen, A. (2007) Proximity, knowledge and innovation in peripheral regions. On the Intersection between Geographical and Organizational Proximity, European Planning Studies, 15(4), 457–466. doi: 10.1080/09654310601133260
   Google Scholar
• Landabaso, M., McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). Guest editorial on research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation in Europe. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 378–389. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-08-2014-0093
   Google Scholar
• Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., & Cinti, T. (2010). The regional development platform and ‘related variety’: Some evidence from art and food in Tuscany. European Planning Studies, 18(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1080/09654310903343518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark, L., & Pettersson, Ö. (2012). The relevance of cluster initiatives in rural areas: Regional policy in Sweden. Urbani Izziv, 23(1), s42–s52. doi: 10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-supplement-1-004
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, J. (2012). Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1085–1099. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.552493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2011). Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy (Documents de treball, IEB(14)), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rst007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2013). The regional state in the era of smart specialisation. Ekonomiaz, 83(02), 103–126. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekz/ekonoz/2013205.html#download
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2015). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies, 49(3), 480–482. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1007572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016a). Collective entrepreneurship: The Basque model of innovation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1544–1560. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1151483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016b). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16645106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2006). Innovation, learning and cluster dynamics. In B. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.), Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations (pp. 137–163). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nuur, C., & Laestadius, S. (2010). Development in peripheral regions: Case studies in Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(3), 293–307. doi: 10.1177/0969776409352156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantisi, N. M., & Leslie, D. (2015). Circus in action: Exploring the role of a translation zone in the Cirque du Soleil’s creative practices. Economic Geography, 91(2), 147–164. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (2006). Do clusters or innovation systems drive competitiveness? In B. Asheim, P. Cooke, & R. Martin (Eds.), Clusters and regional development: Critical reflections and explorations (pp. 164–187). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Teräs, J., Dubois, A., Sörvik, J., & Pertoldi, M. (2015). Implementing smart specialisation in sparsely populated areas (S3 Working Paper 10/2015). European Commission. Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Torre, A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42(6), 869–889. doi: 10.1080/00343400801922814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., & Yeow, J. (2014). Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation, 34(10), 631–645. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar