Beyond ‘related variety’: how inflows of skills shape innovativeness in different industries

References

• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016). Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy, 45, 844–856. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. D. (2002). Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. Journal of Economic Geography, 2, 253–278. doi: 10.1093/jeg/2.3.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 571–591. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45, 905–917. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.45.7.905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Añón Higón, D. (2016). In-house versus external basic research and first-to-market innovations. Research Policy, 45, 816–829. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45, 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 163–173. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0
   Google Scholar
• Balsvik, R. (2011). Is labor mobility a channel for spillovers from multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 285–297. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, 38, 318–337. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Parry, S. (2005). The endurance of the diciplines. In I. Bleiklie & M. Henkel (Eds.), Governing knowledge: A study of continuity and change in higher education (pp. 133–144). Dordrecth: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92, 172–200. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Eriksson, R., & Lindgren, U. (2009). How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 169–190. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Eriksson, R. H., & Lindgren, U. (2014). Labour market externalities and regional growth in Sweden: The importance of labour mobility between skill-related industries. Regional Studies, 48, 1669–1690. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.867429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Børing, P., Fevolden, A., & Herstad, S. (2016). Eager and able: A study of innovation activity among young, mature and old firms in Norway. Economics Bulletin, 36, 291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lenzi, C. (2010). Spatial patterns of inventors’ mobility: Evidence on US urban areas. Papers in Regional Science, 89, 235–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00300.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110, 388–410. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52, 68–82. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellacci, F., & Zheng, J. H. (2010). Technological regimes, Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and firm-level productivity growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 1829–1865. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtq051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cefis, E., & Orsenigo, L. (2001). The persistence of innovative activities – a cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis. Research Policy, 30, 1139–1158. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00139-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Asheim, B., Bugge, M. M., & Herstad, S. J. (2016). Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, doi:10.1177/0263774X16646583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. doi: 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotic-Svetina, A., Jaklic, M., & Prodan, I. (2008). Does collective learning in clusters contribute to innovation? Science and Public Policy, 35, 335–345. doi: 10.3152/030234208X319357
   Google Scholar
• Crepon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, innovation, and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7, 115–158. doi: 10.1080/10438599800000031
   Google Scholar
• Dokko, G., Wilk, S. L., & Rothbard, N. P. (2009). Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organization Science, 20, 51–68. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2010). Exploring and comparing innovation patterns across different knowledge intensive business services. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19, 605–625. doi: 10.1080/10438590903128966
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2004). Organizing practices in services: Capturing practice-based knowledge for innovation. Strategic Organization, 2, 35–64. doi: 10.1177/1476127004040914
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2001). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review, 91, 1454–1477. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebersberger, B., Bloch, C., Herstad, S., & van de Velde, E. L. S. (2012). Open innovation practices and their effect on innovation performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 9, 1–23. doi: 10.1142/S021987701250040X
   Google Scholar
• Ebersberger, B., & Herstad, S. (2011). Product innovation and the complementarities of external interfaces. European Management Review, 8, 117–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2011.01014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejermo, O., Kander, A., & Svensson Henning, M. (2011). The R&D-growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors. Research Policy, 40, 664–672. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R. H. (2011). Localized spillovers and knowledge flows: How does proximity influence the performance of plants? Economic Geography, 87, 127–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R., & Lindgren, U. (2008). Localized mobility clusters: Impacts of labour market externalities on firm performance. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 33–53. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, R., Lindgren, U., & Malmberg, G. (2008). Agglomeration mobility: Effects of localisation, urbanisation, and scale on job changes. Environment and Planning A, 40, 2419–2434. doi: 10.1068/a39312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2010). Community innovation survey – Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS). Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/en/inn_esms.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fey, C. F., & Birkinshaw, J. (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode and R&D performance. Journal of Management, 31, 597–621. doi: 10.1177/0149206304272346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). When local interaction does not suffice: Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1248–1267. doi: 10.1068/a43516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2017). Nothing is in the air. Growth and Change, 48, 22–39. doi: 10.1111/grow.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R. D., & Timmermans, B. (2016). Regional skill relatedness: Towards a new measure of regional related diversification. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 516–538. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1244515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Oort, F. V., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in Cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152. doi: 10.1086/261856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 375–387. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Grimpe, C., & Kaiser, U. (2010). Balancing internal and external knowledge acquisition: The gains and pains from R&D outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1483–1509. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the returns to R&D. In B. H. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 1033–1082). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. M., Panasian, C. A., & Seiler, M. J. (2011). Further evidence on the capital structure of REITs. Real Estate Economics, 39, 133–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the high technology sector and product classification. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specifcation error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, L., Munoz-Doyague, M. F., & Nieto, M. (2010). Mobility of public researchers, scientific knowledge transfer, and the firm’s innovation process. Journal of Business Research, 63, 510–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S. J. (2017). Innovation strategy choices in the urban economy. Urban Studies, doi:10.1177/0042098017692941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S., Bloch, C., Ebersberger, B., & van de Velde, E. L. S. (2010). National innovation policy and global open innovation: Exploring balances, tradeoffs and complementarities. Science and Public Policy, 37, 113–124. doi: 10.3152/030234210X489590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S., & Brekke, T. (2012). Globalization, modes of innovation and regional knowledge diffusion infrastructures. European Planning Studies, 20, 1603–1625. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.713334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S., & Ebersberger, B. (2014). Urban agglomerations, knowledge-intensive services and innovation: Establishing the core connections. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26, 211–233. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2014.888098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herstad, S., Sandven, T., & Ebersberger, B. (2015). Recruitment, knowledge integration and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 44, 138–153. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoetker, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 331–343. doi: 10.1002/smj.582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, S. K. (2005). The compositional impact of team diversity on performance: Theoretical considerations. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1534484305275847
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36, 680–693. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jøranli, I., & Herstad, S. J. (2017). Urban concentration and labour market linkages in the Norwegian ICT services sector. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1734–1755. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1337726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., & Nachum, L. (2002). Why do business service firms cluster? Small consultancies, clustering and decentralization in London and southern England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27, 67–90. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Marschke, G. (2005). Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm’s patenting decision. Rand Journal of Economics, 36, 298–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461–477. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiponen, A., & Drejer, I. (2007). What exactly are technological regimes? Intra-industry heterogeneity in the organization of innovation activities. Research Policy, 36(8), 1221–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250131009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250141009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. A. (2011). Accounting for creativity in the European Union: A multi-level analysis of individual competence, labour market structure, and systems of education and training. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 269–294. doi: 10.1093/cje/beq014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1993). Technological regimes and firm bebavior. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 45–71. doi: 10.1093/icc/2.1.45
   Google Scholar
• Maliranta, M., Mohnen, P., & Rouvinen, P. (2009). Is inter-firm labor mobility a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from a linked employer-employee panel. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18, 1161–1191. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtp031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmberg, A., & Power, D. (2005). (How) do (firms in) clusters create knowledge? Industry and Innovation, 12, 409–431. doi: 10.1080/13662710500381583
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. (1920). Industrial organization, continued. The concentration of specialized industries in particular localities. In A. Marshall (Ed.), Principles of economics, Book IV, Chapter X (9th ed, pp. 222–231). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography – rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86, 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. (2007). Sketching out a model of innovation, face-to-face interaction and economic geography. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2, 117–134. doi: 10.1080/17421770701346622
   Google Scholar
• Miles, I. (2008). Patterns of innovation in services industries. IBM Systems Journal, 47, 115–128. doi: 10.1147/sj.471.0115
   Google Scholar
• Møen, J. (2005). Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 81–114. doi: 10.1086/425434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., & Henning, M. (2013). Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 297–316. doi: 10.1002/smj.2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversity over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., Boschma, R., Lundquist, K.-J., & Olander, L.-O. (2011). The dynamics of agglomeration externalities along the life cycle of industries. Regional Studies, 45, 49–65. doi: 10.1080/00343401003596307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Phelps, E. S. (1966). Investments in humans, technological diffusion and economic growth. American Economic Review, 56, 69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, M. J., & Santamarıa, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27, 367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., & Duysters, G. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oettl, A., & Agrawal, A. (2008). International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities. Journal of international Business Studies, 39, 1242–1260. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econmetric methods for fractional logit response variables with an application to 401(K) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619–632. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesola, H. (2011). Labour mobility and returns to experience in foreign firms. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113, 637–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, D., & Lundmark, M. (2004). Working through knowledge pools: Labour market dynamics, the transference of knowledge and ideas, and industrial clusters. Urban Studies, 41, 1025–1044. doi: 10.1080/00420980410001675850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., & Probst, G. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20, 685–695. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, H., & Drazin, R. (2002). Overcoming resource constraints on product innovation by recruiting talent from rivals: A study of the mutual fund industry, 1986–94. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 491–507. doi: 10.2307/3069377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, S., Du, J., & Love, J. H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37, 961–977. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49, 751–766. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapprasert, K., & Clausen, T. H. (2012). Organizational innovation and its effects. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 1283–1305. doi: 10.1093/icc/dts023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, T. (2010). Absorptive capacity – one size fits all? Managerial and Decision Economics, 31, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 37, 1492–1503. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. (2015). Far from the madding crowd: Slow innovators, information value, and the geography of innovation. Growth and Change, 46, 424–442. doi: 10.1111/grow.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, L. M., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., Jung, D. I., Randel, A. E., & Singh, G. (2009). Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going? Human Resource Management Review, 19, 117–133. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., & Agrawal, A. (2011). Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Science, 57, 129–150. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim, M. C. W. (2017). Innovation, space and diversity. Stavanger: University of Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Solheim, M. C. W., & Herstad, S. J. (in press). The differentiated effects of human resource diversity on corporate innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management.
   Google Scholar
• Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2012). Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 537–562. doi: 10.1007/s11187-012-9453-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351–370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. (2003). Expert talent and the design of (professional services) firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 895–916. doi: 10.1093/icc/12.4.895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, B., & Boschma, R. (2014). The effect of intra- and inter-regional labour mobility on plant performance in Denmark: The significance of related labour inflows. Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 289–311. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbs059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tregenna, F. (2009). Characterising deindustrialisation: An analysis of changes in manufacturing employment and output internationally. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, 433–466. doi: 10.1093/cje/ben032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzabbar, D. (2009). When does scientist recruitment affect technological repositioning? Academy of Management Journal, 52, 873–896. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.44632853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 292–312. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. C., He, J. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2009). Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The roles of economic and relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1265–1285. doi: 10.1002/smj.787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuyts, S., Colombo, M. G., Dutta, S., & Nooteboom, B. (2005). Empirical tests of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58, 277–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar