Tacit coopetition: chimera or reality? Evidence from the Basque Country

References

• Ahuja, G., Lampert, C., & Tandon, V. (2008). Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 1–98. doi: 10.1080/19416520802211446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonioli, D., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2014). Regional innovation policy and innovative behaviour: Looking for additional effects. European Planning Studies, 22(1), 64–83. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., Eriksson, J., & Wincent, J. (2010). Co-opetition dynamics – An outline for further inquiry. Competitiveness Review, 20(2), 194–214. doi: 10.1108/10595421011029893
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., & Johansson, M. (2014). Managing coopetition to create opportunities for small firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(4), 401–427. doi: 10.1177/0266242612461288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (1999). Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 14(3), 178–194. doi: 10.1108/08858629910272184
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). ‘Coopetition’ in business networks – To cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00067-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., Clauß, T., & Fredrich, V. (2016). Product innovation through coopetition in alliances: Singular or plural governance? Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-opetition: A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation in the marketplace. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975–1005. doi: 10.1093/icc/10.4.975
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. S., & Chen, B. Y. (2011). Utilizing patent analysis to explore the cooperative competition relationship of the two LED companies: Nichia and Osram. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 294–302. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, T., & Peng, T. (2005). Competition and cooperation intensity in a network–a case study in Taiwan simulator industry. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(2), 150–155.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cygler, J., Gajdzik, B., & Sroka, W. (2014). Coopetition as a development stimulator of enterprises in the networked steel sector. Metalurgija, 53(3), 383–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., & Mitchell, W. (2000). Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 99–126. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200002)21:2<99::AID-SMJ80>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenmann, F., & Reiss, M. (2012). Co-opetition as a facilitator of manufacturing competitiveness: Opportunities and threats. In H. El Maraghy (Ed.), Enabling manufacturing competitiveness and economic sustainability (pp. 403–408). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Estrada, I., Faems, D., & de Faria, P. (2016). Coopetition and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A. S., Le Roy, F., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2014). Sources and management of tension in co-opetition case evidence from telecommunications satellites manufacturing in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 222–235. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzen, J., & Nakamoto, K. (1993). Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 360–375. doi: 10.1086/209355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraudel, M., & Salvetat, D. (2014). What are the antecedents of coopetition? An explanation in terms of centrality and personality traits. European Business Review, 26(1), 23–42. doi: 10.1108/EBR-09-2012-0051
   Google Scholar
• Gnyawali, D. R., & He, J. (2006). Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: An empirical examination. Journal of Management, 32(4), 507–530. doi: 10.1177/0149206305284550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnyawali, D., He, J., & Madhavan, R. (2008). Co-opetition: Promises and challenges. In C. Wankel (Ed.), 21st century management: A reference handbook (pp. I-386–I-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gnyawali, D., & Park, B. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnyawali, D., & Park, B. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhrgebeit. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, B., Feng, Y., & Frigant, V. (2017). Rethinking the ‘mirroring’ hypothesis: implications for technological modularity, tacit coordination, and radical innovation. R&D Management, 47(1), 3–16. doi: 10.1111/radm.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS™ system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jankowska, B. (2011). Implications of coopetition for international competitiveness and internationalization of firms: Perspective of SME and large companies. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(1), 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Katsanakis, I., Kossyva, D., & Vorria, E. (2011). Co-opetition strategy in business excellence: Confronting the economic crisis. Proceedings of 14th QMOD-ICQSS Conference on Quality and Service Sciences, pp. 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 193–210. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<193::AID-SMJ949>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, S., Nisuls, J., & Söderqvist, A. (2010). Co-opetition: A source of international opportunities in Finnish SMEs. Competitiveness Review, 20(2), 111–125. doi: 10.1108/10595421011029839
   Google Scholar
• Kylänen, M., & Rusko, R. (2011). Unintentional coopetition in the service industries: The case of Pyhä-Luosto tourism destination in the Finnish Lapland. European Management Journal, 29(3), 193–205. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner, B., & Seidel, V. P. (2009). Collaborative concept development using supplier competitions: Insights from the automotive industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D. (2007). Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12), 1187–1212. doi: 10.1002/smj.637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1080/08985620210159220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner, C., Soppe, B., & Dowling, M. (2016). Vertical coopetition and the sales growth of young and small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(1), 67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, T., & Polsa, P. (2016). Coopetition close to the customer – A case study of a small business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y. (2007). A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2), 129–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastroeni, M., Tait, J., & Rosiello, A. (2013). Regional innovation policies in a globally connected environment. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 8–16. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., Koçak, A., & Özer, A. (2007). Coopetition as a small business strategy: Implications for performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18(1), 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. (3rd ed.). Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Padula, G., & Dagnino, G. (2007). Untangling the rise of coopetition: The intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. International Studies of Management and Organization, 37(2), 32–52. doi: 10.2753/IMO0020-8825370202
   Google Scholar
• Park, B., Srivastava, M., & Gnyawali, D. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210–221. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy, 41, 1–18. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100066110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Porto Gómez, I., Otegi Olaso, J. R., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2016). Modelling a regional, open, sectoral innovation system. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(1), 26–50. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2015.1095946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porto Gómez, I., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., & Aguirre Larrakoetxea, U. (2017). Old wine in old bottles: The neglected role of vocational training centres in innovation. Vocations & Learning. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12186-017-9187-6
   Google Scholar
• Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), 927–938. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00060-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy – When is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2013). Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition. The role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 154–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00956.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., & Blomqvist, K. (2009). Tug of war in innovation-coopetitive service development. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 12(3), 255–272. doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2009.025390
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Thornill, A., & Lewis, P. (2011). Research methods for business students. Essex: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Soubeyran, A., & Weber, S. (2002). District formation and local social capital: A (tacit) co-opetition approach. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1), 65–92. doi: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00005-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, L., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2016). Coopetition as a paradox: Integrative approaches in a multi-company, cross-sector partnership. Organization Studies, 37(5), 655–685. doi: 10.1177/0170840615622066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. (1996). Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31(2), 193–224. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(96)00895-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley, K. (2007). Coopetition: An introduction to the subject and an agenda for research. International Studies of Management and Organization, 37(2), 11–31. doi: 10.2753/IMO0020-8825370201
   Google Scholar
• Walley, K., & Custance, P. (2010). Coopetition: Insights from the agri-food supply chain. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 10(3), 185–192. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2010.x187
   Google Scholar
• Yami, S., & Nemeh, A. (2014). Organizing coopetition for innovation: The case of wireless telecommunication sector in Europe. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 250–260. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zineldin, M. (2004). Co-opetition: The organisation of the future. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 22(7), 780–790. doi: 10.1108/02634500410568600
   Google Scholar