Social sustainability tool for assessing land use planning processes

References

• Alexander, E. R. (2016). There is no planning – only planning practices: Notes from spatial planning theories. Planning Theory, 15(1), 91–103. doi: 10.1177/1473095215594617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancell, S., & Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2008). The social sustainability of medium density housing: A conceptual model and Christchurch case study. Housing Studies, 23(3), 423–442. doi: 10.1080/02673030802029990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassarri, D., & Diani, M. (2007). The integrative power of civic networks. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 735–780. doi: 10.1086/521839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, L., & Gauntlett, E. (2002). Stage 1 report – model of social sustainability. Housing and sustainable communities’ indicators project. Perth: Murdoch University.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, H. (2000). Sustainable communities: The potential for eco-neighbourhoods. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., & Conroy, M. M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1080/01944360008976081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. J. (2016). Identifying a knowledge management approach for public-private partnerships. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 158–180. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2016.1204928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. D. (2016). The planner’s triangle revisited: Sustainability and the evolution of a planning ideal that can’t stand still. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 388–397. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, H., Moobela, C., Price, A. D. F., & Marthur, V. N. (2007). Assessing urban social sustainability: Current capabilities and opportunities for future research. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability: Annual Review, 1(3), 39–50. doi: 10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v03i03/54355
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, R. L. H. (2003). Social sustainability, sustainable development and housing development: The experience of Hong Kong. In R. Forrest & J. Lee (Eds.), Housing and social change: East-west perspectives (pp. 221–239). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cocklin, C., & Alston, M. (2003). Community sustainability in rural Australia: A question of capital? Wagga Wagga: Center for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University.
   Google Scholar
• Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (Eds.). (2010). Urban regeneration & social sustainability; best practice from European cities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darchen, S., & Ladouceur, E. (2013). Social sustainability in urban regeneration practice: A case study of fortitude valley renewal plan in Brisbane. Australian Planner, 50(4), 340–350. doi: 10.1080/07293682.2013.764909
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, M. (2010). Social sustainability and the city. Geography Compass, 4(7), 872–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00339.x
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., Hansen, R., Rall, E., Pauleit, S., Lafortezza, R., De Bellis, Y. D., … Tosics, I. (2015). Green infrastructure planning and implementation. Retrieved from http://greensurge.eu/working-packages/wp5/files/D_5.1_Davies_et_al_2015_Green_Infrastructure_Planning_and_Implementation_v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. K. D., & Herbert, D. T. (1993). Communities within cities. London: Belhaven/Halstead-Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, M., & Allwinkle, S. (2007). Urban regeneration and sustainable communities: The role of networks, innovation, and creativity in building successful partnerships. Journal of Urban Technology, 14(1), 77–91. doi: 10.1080/10630730701260118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, K., & Van Kempen, R. (2009). Participation, social cohesion and the challenges in the governance process: An analysis of a post-world war II neighbourhood in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 17(1), 109–130. doi: 10.1080/09654310802514011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lange, M., & De Waal, M. (2013). Owning the city: New media and citizen engagement in urban design. First Monday, Special Issue Media & the City, 18(11). doi: 10.5210/fm.v18i11.4954
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Wiley InterScience, Sustainable Development. Retrieved from www.interscience.wiley.com
   Google Scholar
• Department of Planning Western Australia. (2012). Role of social infrastructure in local and regional economic development. RDSA Regional Infrastructure Summit. Retrieved from http://www.sgsep.com.au/assets/20130332-Linda-Perrine-presentation-130719.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DESA. (2009). Creating an inclusive society: Practical strategies to promote social integration. United Nation Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2009/Ghana/inclusive-society.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eames, M., & Adebowale, M. (2002). Sustainable development and social inclusion: Towards an integrated approach to research. London: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Eizenberg, E., & Jabareen, Y. (2017). Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 9(1), 68. doi: 10.3390/su9010068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eizenberg, E., & Shilon, M. (2016). Pedagogy for the new planner: Refining qualitative toolbox. Environment and Planning B, 43, 1118–1135. doi: 10.1177/0265813515604477
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Equity Act (30.12.2014/1325, including amendments up until 768/2017).
   Google Scholar
• Erdiaw-Kwasie, M., & Basson, M. (2017). Reimaging socio-spatial planning: Towards a synthesis between sense of place and social sustainability approaches. Planning Theory, 1–19. doi: 10.1177/1473095217736793
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital, and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143. doi: 10.1080/00420980120087081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Gapas, D. F. (2013). Evaluation social sustainability in plans for inter-cultural cities (Master’s thesis). Virginia Commonwealth University. VSU Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3018. Retrieved from http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/3018
   Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D., & Rouse, D. (2015). Sustaining places: Best practices for comprehensive plans. Chicago: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• González Martínez, M. F. (2015). Social sustainability in the land use planning process of Bogotá (Master’s thesis). Aalto University. Retrieved from https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/18124
   Google Scholar
• Guzman, S., & Douglas, A. (2015). Livability for all. American Planning Association. Retrieved from https://www.planning.org/planning/2015/dec/livabilityforall.htm
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, B. (2016). The role of planning in minimizing the negative impacts of global climate change. Urban Planning, 1(3), 13–24. doi: 10.17645/up.v1i3.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Zonneveld, W. (2000). Spatial planning in network society – rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 8(3), 337–355. doi: 10.1080/713666411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422×602303814821 doi: 10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Herrle, P., Fokdal, J., Ley, A., & Nebel, S. (2016). Cities alliance – cities without slums. Technical background paper. Retrieved from https://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/CA_Images/2016_04_27_TBP_InclusivePartnerships_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M. (2012). Urban policy engagement with social sustainability in Metro, Vancouver. Urban Studies, 49(3), 527–542. doi: 10.1177/0042098011403015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgersen, S. (2015). Spatial planning as condensation of social relations: A dialectical approach. Planning Theory, 14(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1177/1473095213501672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, N., & Rydin, Y. (2013). What can social capital tell us about planning under localism? Local Government Studies, 39(1), 71–88. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2012.675330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Gruber, J. (2005). Planning styles in conflict: The metropolitan transportation commission. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 177–188. doi: 10.1080/01944360508976691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64, 55–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., Segerstedt, E., Olofsson, T., & Jakobsson, M. (2016). Revealing social values by 3D city visualization in city transformations. Sustainability, 8(2), 195. doi: 10.3390/su8020195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., & Tyger, T. (2016). Let the citizen map: Public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process. Planning Practice & Research, 31(2), 195–214. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R., & Venables, A. J. (2005). Spatial inequality and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keefer, P., & Knack, S. (2003). Social capital, social norms and the new institutional economics. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25025/1/MPRA_paper_25025.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kellaher, L., Peace, S. M., & Holland, C. (2004). Environment, identity, and old age: Quality of life or a life of quality? In A. Walker & C. Hagan Hennessy (Eds.), Growing older: Quality of life in old age (pp. 60–80). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Haybatollahi, M., & Schmidt-Throme, K. (2016). Urban happiness: Context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban setting. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(1), 34–57. doi: 10.1177/0265813515600121
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, D. (2000). Planning theories and environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(6), 607–625. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00036-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LUBA (Land Use and Building Act 132/1999, including amendments up until 569/2016).
   Google Scholar
• LUBD (Land use and Building Decree 895/1999 including amendments up until 233/2016).
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (2017). Performance management and citizen satisfaction with the government: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Public Administration, 95(1), 39–59. doi: 10.1111/padm.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maginn, P. J. (2007). Towards more effective community participation in urban regeneration: The potential of collaborative planning and applied ethnography. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 25–43. doi: 10.1177/1468794106068020
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R. (2005). Approaches to participation in urban planning theories. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.3107&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mayan, M., Turner, A. T., Ortiz, L., & Moffatt, J. (2013). Building a multicultural coalition: Promoting participation in civic society among ethnic minority communities. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 45(1–2), 157–178. doi: 10.1353/ces.2013.0020
   Google Scholar
• McClintock, C. G., & Keil, L. J. (1983). Social values: Their definition, their development, and their impact on human decision making in setting of outcome independence. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 123–143). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series No 27. Hawke Research Institute University of South Australia. Retrieved from http://naturalcapital.us/images/Social%20Sustainability%20-%20Towards%20Some%20Definitions_20100120_024059.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meegan, R., & Mitchell, A. (2001). ‘It’s not community round here, it’s neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies. Urban Studies, 38, 2167–2194. doi: 10.1080/00420980120087117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood, A., & Parra, C. (2013). Social innovation in an unsustainable world. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & H. Abdelillah (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 53–66). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, B. F. (2016). How participatory planning processes for transit-oriented development contribute to social sustainability. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(3), 520–524. doi: 10.1007/s13412-014-0217-5
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan, L. (2017). Socio-spatial learning: A case study of community knowledge in participatory spatial planning. Progress in Planning, 111, 1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaidou, S., Klöti, T., Tappert, S., & Drilling, M. (2016). Urban gardening and green space governance: Towards new collaborative planning practices. Urban Planning, 1(1), 5–19. doi: 10.17645/up.v1i1.520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, C., Baldwin, C., & Thomson, D. (2016). Contributions of social capital to best practice urban planning outcomes. Urban Policy and Research, 34(3), 212–224. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2015.1062361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, A. R., & Vanegas, J. A. (2002). Defining sustainability for built environment systems: An operational framework. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 2(1–3), 94–113. doi: 10.1504/IJETM.2002.000780
   Google Scholar
• Pearsall, H., & Pierce, J. (2010). Urban sustainability and environmetnal justice: Evaluating the linkages in public planning/policy discourse. International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 15(6), 569–580. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2010.487528
   Google Scholar
• Polese, M., & Stren, R. (2000). The social sustainability of cities: Diversity and the management of change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2007). Securing sustainable communities: Citizenship, safety, and sustainability in the new urban planning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(4), 305–320. doi: 10.1177/0969776407081164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashidfarokhi, A., Toivonen, S., & Viitanen, K. (2018). Sustainability reporting in the nordic real estate companies: Empirical evidence from Finland. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 22(1), 52–64. doi: 10.3846/ijspm.2018.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasoolimanesh, S., Badarulzaman, N., & Jaafar, M. (2011). Achievement to sustainable urban development using city development strategies: A comparison between cities alliance and the world bank definitions. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(5), 151–166. doi: 10.5539/jsd.v4n5p151
   Google Scholar
• Staffans, A., Rantanen, H., & Nummi, P. (2010). Local internet forums: Interactive land use planning and urban development in neighbourhoods. In N. C. Silva (Ed.), Handbook for research on e-planning: ICTs for urban development and monitoring (pp. 80–102). USA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• STAR Communities. (2016). Our framework. Retrieved from http://www.starcommunities.org/about/framework/
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. doi: 10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susniene, D., & Jurkauskas, A. (2009). The concepts of quality of life and happiness – correlation and differences. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 3, 58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Szreter, S., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 33(4), 650–667. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2002). The social goals of new urbanism. Housing Policy Debate, 13(1), 165–188. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2002.9521438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., & Brody, S. D. (2009). Linking planning theories with factors influencing local environmental-plan quality. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, 522–537. doi:10.1068/b3407 doi: 10.1068/b34076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen, S. (2011). The future commercial real estate market – the forces of change, influences, and preferences in the Helsinki metropolitan area (Doctoral thesis). Aalto University. Retrieved from http://lib.tkk.fi/Diss/2011/isbn9789526044194/
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen, S., & Viitanen, K. (2015). Forces of change shaping the future commercial real estate market in the Helsinki metropolitan area in Finland. Land Use Policy, 42, 471–478. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen, S., & Viitanen, K. (2016). Environmental scanning and futures wheels as tools to analyze the possible future themes of the commercial real estate market. Land Use Policy, 52(1), 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.011
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, R., & Fenton, A. (2006). In the mix: A review of research of mixed income, mixed tenure and mixed communities. York: A Joint Publication from Housing Corporation, Joseph Rowntree Foundation and English Partnerships.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, R., Lupton, R., Power, A., & Richardson, L. (2011). Building the big society ( CASE Reports; No. 67). York: CASE, LSE.
   Google Scholar
• Udovic, D. (2006). Economic security. Ljubljana: Large and Small States in Enlarged European Union, Centre for International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2015). Gender equality and the environment. Retrieved from http://apps.unep.org/piwik/download.php?file=/publications/pmtdocuments/-Gender_equality_and_the_environment__Policy_and_strategy-2015Gender_equality_and_the_environment_policy_and_strategy.pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Green Building Council. (2017). Diverse uses. Retrieved from https://www.usgbc.org/credits/lt32
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (1993). WHO global strategy for health and environment. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/59479/1/WHO_EHE_93.2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J., & Taub, R. P. (2006). There goes the neighbourhood: Racial, ethnic and class tensions in four Chicago neighbourhoods and their meaning for America. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2017). The travel & tourism competitiveness report 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-travel-tourism-competitiveness-report-2017
   Google Scholar