Science and technology cooperation in cross-border regions: a proximity approach with evidence for Northern Europe

References

• Aalto, P. (2006). European Union and the making of a wider Northern Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, M., & Laberge, S. (2007). The legitimation and dissemination processes of the innovation system approach: The case of the Canadian and Québec science and technology policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32, 221–249. doi: 10.1177/0162243906296854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldieri, L. (2013). Knowledge technological proximity: Evidence from US and European patents. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22, 807–819. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2013.788838
   Google Scholar
• Anishenko, A., & Sergunin, A. (2012). Twin cities: A new form of cross-border cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region? Baltic Region, 4, 19–27. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2012-1-3
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6, 131–140. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720451
   Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., & Bruzelius, M. (2010). Are patents with multiple inventors from different countries a good indicator of international R&D collaboration? Research Policy, 39, 1321–1334. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergs, R. (2012). Cross-border cooperation, regional disparities and integration of markets in the EU. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 27, 345–363. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2012.751710
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J. (2004). From ‘spaces of place’ to ‘spaces of flows’? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 530–548. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2005). From publishing to patenting: Do productive scientists turn into academic inventors? Revue d’Économie Industrielle, 110, 75–102. doi: 10.3406/rei.2005.3073
   Google Scholar
• Cassi, L., Morrison, A., & Rabellotti, R. (2015). Proximity and scientific collaboration: Evidence from the global wine industry. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 106, 205–219. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Asheim, B. (2004). Nodes, networks and proximities: On the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster. European Planning Studies, 12, 1003–1018. doi: 10.1080/0965431042000267876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2002). Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 133–145. doi: 10.1023/A:1013160923450
   Google Scholar
• Decoville, A., Durand, F., Sohn, C., & Walther, O. (2013). Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: Towards a functional typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28, 221–237. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2013.854654
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Perrin, T. (2017). Eurometropolis Lille–Kortrijk–Tournai: Cross-border integration with or without the border? European Urban and Regional Studies. doi: 10.1177/0969776417704688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B. (1981). Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika, 68, 589–599. doi: 10.1093/biomet/68.3.589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, J., & del-Palacio, I. (2009). Global networks of clusters of innovation: Accelerating the innovation process. Business Horizons, 52, 493–503. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). Boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2008). NACE Rev. 2: Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. Luxembourg: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: What we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38, 583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 222–232. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41, 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, T., & Gualda, E. (2017). Disclosing the relational structure of institutional cross-border cooperation in two cross-border regions in Europe. Journal of Borderlands Studies. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1399810
   Google Scholar
• Greunz, L. (2005). Intra- and inter-regional knowledge spillovers: Evidence from European regions. European Planning Studies, 13, 449–473. doi: 10.1080/09654310500089746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. (2013). Bridging regional innovation: Cross-border collaboration in the Øresund region. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography, 113, 25–38. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2013.781306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harguindéguy, J.-B., & Bray, Z. (2009). Does cross-border cooperation empower European regions? The case of INTERREG III–A France–Spain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 747–760. doi: 10.1068/c08119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, C., Siller, M., Schatzer, T., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2018). Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39, 662–673. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkinen, T. (2005). European coherence and regional policy? A Finnish perspective on the observed and reported territorial impacts of EU research and development policies. European Planning Studies, 13, 1113–1121. doi: 10.1080/09654310500242139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, S., & Lee, K. (2010). Samsung’s catch-up with Sony: An analysis using US patent data. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 15, 271–287. doi: 10.1080/13547860.2010.494907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaisto, B., & Nartova, N. (2008). Imatra-Svetogorsk kaksoiskaupunki: Asennebarometri [Imatra-Svetogorsk twin city: Attitude barometer]. Lappeenranta: Etelä-Karjala Instituutti.
   Google Scholar
• Kiryushin, P., Mulloth, B., & Iakovleva, T. (2013). Developing cross-border regional innovation systems with clean technology entrepreneurship: The case of Øresund. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 5, 179–195. doi: 10.1504/IJIRD.2013.055237
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., van Montfort, K., & Brouwer, E. (2002). The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, 109–121. doi: 10.1080/10438590210899
   Google Scholar
• Koschatzky, K. (2000). A river is a river-cross-border networking between Baden and Alsace. European Planning Studies, 8, 429–449. doi: 10.1080/713666422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liikanen, I. (2008). New neighbourhood and cross-border region-building: Identity politics of CBC on the Finnish–Russian border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 23, 19–38. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2008.9695706
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K. (2004). The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981–1997). Research Policy, 33, 287–321. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, M., Rego, C., Vieira, C., & Vieira, I. (2017). Proximity and cooperation for innovative regional development. In L. Carvalho (Ed.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurial development and innovation within smart cities (pp. 199–228). Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K.-J., & Trippl, M. (2013). Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Regional Studies, 47, 450–460. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.560933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. (2007). National innovation systems: Analytical concept and development tool. Industry and Innovation, 14, 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13662710601130863
   Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M., & Uberti, T. (2009). Knowledge network across Europe: Which distance matters? Annals of Regional Science, 43, 691–720. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0254-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T. (2015). Scientific collaboration in the Danish–German border region of Southern Jutland–Schleswig. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography, 115, 27–38. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2015.1011180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T. (2016). Measuring cross-border regional integration with composite indicators: The Oresund integration index. In V. Jeremic, Z. Radojicic, & M. Dobrota (Eds.), Emerging trends in the development and application of composite indicators (pp. 1–19). Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., & Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: Conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24, 1623–1642. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., & van der Have, R. (2013). Benchmarking regional innovative performance: Composite measures and direct innovation counts. Scientometrics, 94, 247–262. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0753-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., & Weidenfeld, A. (2016). Knowledge-based urban development of cross-border twin cities. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 7, 389–406. doi: 10.1504/IJKBD.2016.080881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., Weidenfeld, A., & Williams, A. (2017). Cross-border regional innovation system integration: An analytical framework. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108, 805–820. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., & Williams, A. (2016). Border region studies: The structure of an ‘offbeat’ field of regional studies. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3, 355–367. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2016.1209982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., & Williams, A. (2018). Developing survey metrics for analysing cross-border proximity. Geografisk Tidsskrift–Danish Journal of Geography, 118, 114–121. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2017.1405734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., Williams, A., Weidenfeld, A., & Kaisto, V. (2018). Cross-border knowledge transfer and innovation in the European neighbourhood: Tourism cooperation at the Finnish-Russian border. Tourism Management, 68, 140–151. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maraut, S., Dernis, H., Webb, C., Spiezia, V., & Guellec, D. (2008). The OECD RegPAT database: A presentation. OECD STI Working Paper, 2008(2). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. (2004). The Öresund area: Pre- and post-bridge cross-border functional integration. GeoJournal, 61, 31–39. doi: 10.1007/s10708-005-5234-1
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, R. (2013). Can’t see the forest for the leaves: Similarity and distance measures for hierarchical taxonomies with a patent classification example. Research Policy, 42, 855–873. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2010). Old vs. recent cross-border cooperation: Portugal–Spain and Norway–Sweden. Area, 42, 434–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00940.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., & Jonsson, O. (2007). Knowledge collaboration and proximity: The spatial organization of biotech innovation projects. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14, 115–131. doi: 10.1177/0969776407075556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, E., Zenker, A., Hufnagl, M., Héraud, J.-A., Schnabl, E., Makkonen, T., & Kroll, H. (2017). Smart specialisation strategies and cross-border integration of regional innovation systems: Policy dynamics and challenges for the Upper Rhine. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 684–702. doi:10.1177/0263774X16688472
   Google Scholar
• Nagaoka, S., Motohashi, K., & Goto, A. (2010). Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. In B. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 1083–1127). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. (2009). Measuring knowledge spillovers: What patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 38, 994–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. (1994). A Region-building approach to Northern Europe. Review of International Studies, 20, 53–74. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500117784
   Google Scholar
• NORDEN. (2004). Cross-border cooperation in the Baltic countries and North-West Russia. Vilnius: Nordic Council of Ministers’ Information Office.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Regions and innovation: Collaborating across borders. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E. (2015). Constructing regional advantage in branding the cross-border Euroregion Galicia–Northern Portugal. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2, 341–349. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1044020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, F., & Mulvey, G. (2018). Cross-border collaboration in economic development: Institutional change on the Anglo–Scottish border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33, 69–84. doi: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1257365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 308–322. doi: 10.1162/0034653053970258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (1999). Building governance institutions across European borders. Regional Studies, 33, 657–667. doi: 10.1080/00343409950078693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10, 153–171. doi: 10.1177/0969776403010002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007a). Construction of new territorial scales: A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region. Regional Studies, 41, 253–266. doi: 10.1080/00343400600990517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007b). Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 861–879. doi: 10.1068/c60m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. (2009). Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88, 531–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., & Hu, Y. (2011). Collaborative knowledge production in China: Regional evidence from a gravity model approach. Regional Studies, 45, 755–772. doi: 10.1080/00343401003713373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. (2017). Cartography of a blind spot: An exploratory analysis of European border cities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108, 512–518. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., Reitel, B., & Walther, O. (2009). Cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: The case of Luxembourg, Basel and Geneva. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 922–939. doi: 10.1068/c0893r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Grimes, S. (2017). The actors and relations in evolving networks: The determinants of inter-regional technology transaction in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. (2010). Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101, 150–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, J., Benneworth, P., & Rutten, R. (2018). Border blocking effects in collaborative firm innovation. European Planning Studies. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1476470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, J., & Smulders, H. (2014). Institutional gaps in cross-border regional innovation systems: The horticultural industry in Venlo–Lower Rhine. In R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, & F. Boekema (Eds.), The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 157–176). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, J., & Smulders, H. (2015). Institutional hindrances in cross-border regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2, 116–122. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1007158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar