767
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Residential location, workplace location and car driving in four Norwegian cities

, &
Pages 2036-2057 | Received 09 Jan 2018, Accepted 25 Jul 2018, Published online: 02 Aug 2018

References

  • Alonso, W. (1960). A theory of the urban land market. Papers in Regional Science, 6, 149–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01710.x
  • Bruegmann, R. (2005). Sprawl: A compact history. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2006). Which reduces vehicle travel more: Jobs-housing balance or retail-housing mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 475–490. doi: 10.1080/01944360608976767
  • Cervero, R., & Landis, J. (1992). Suburbanization of jobs and the journey to work: A submarket analysis of commuting in the San Francisco Bay area. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 26, 275–297. doi: 10.1002/atr.5670260305
  • Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2, 199–219. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
  • Cervero, R., & Wu, K. L. (1997). Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco bay area. Environment & Planning A, 29, 865–886. doi: 10.1068/a290865
  • Chatman, D. (2003). How density and mixed uses at the workplace affect personal commercial travel and commute mode choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1831, 193–201. doi: 10.3141/1831-22
  • Christiansen, P., Gundersen, F., & Gregersen, F. A. (2016). Kompakte byer og lite bilbruk? Reisemønster og arealbruk. TØI rapport 1505. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.
  • Duun, H. P. (1994). Byutviklingens transportvirkninger. En studie av transporteffekter, energibruk og utslipp til luft ved alternative byutviklingsstrategier i Bergen. Bergen: West Norwegian Planning Group.
  • Echenique, M., Hargreaves, A. J., Mitchell, D., & Namdeo, A. (2012). Growing cities sustainably: Does urban form really matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(2), 121–137. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2012.666731
  • Elldér, E. (2014). Residential location and daily travel distances: The influence of trip purpose. Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.008
  • Elldér, E. (2017). Does telework weaken urban structure–travel relationships? Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(2), 187–210.
  • Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 265–294. doi: 10.1080/01944361003766766
  • Fishman, R. (1996). Bourgeois utopias: Visions of suburbia. In S. Fainstein, & S. Campbell (Eds.), Readings in urban theory (pp. 23–60). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
  • Handy, S. L. (1993). Regional versus local accessibility: Implication for non-work travel. Transportation Research Record, 1400, 58–66.
  • Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. L. (2001). Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel. Transportation, 28(4), 317–346. doi: 10.1023/A:1011850618753
  • Hartoft-Nielsen, P. (2001). Arbejdspladslokalisering og transportadfærd. Hørsholm: Forskningscenteret for skov og landskab.
  • Holden, E., & Norland, I. T. (2004). En undersøkelse av husholdningers forbruk av energi til bolig og transport i Stor-Oslo. Oslo: University of Oslo.
  • Lee, B., Gordon, P., Moore IIJ. E., & Richardson, H. (2011). The attributes of residence/workplace areas and transit commuting. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(3), 43–63. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v4i3.310
  • Lin, D., Allan, A., & Cui, J. (2015). The impact of polycentric urban development on commuting behaviour in urban China: Evidence from four sub-centres of Beijing. Habitat International, 50, 195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.018
  • Milakis, D., Vlastos, T., & Barbopoplos, N. (2008). Relationships between urban form and travel behaviour in Athens, Greece. A comparison with Western European and North American results. European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, 8, 201–215.
  • Mogridge, M. H. J. (1985). Transport, land use and energy interaction. Urban Studies, 22, 481–492. doi: 10.1080/00420988520080851
  • Næss, P. (2005). Residential location affects travel behavior—but how and why? The case of Copenhagen metropolitan area. Progress in Planning, 63, 167–257. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2004.07.004
  • Næss, P. (2009). Residential self-selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 293–324. doi: 10.1080/01441640802710812
  • Næss, P. (2010). Residential location, travel, and energy use in the Hangzhou metropolitan area. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(3), 27–59. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v3i3.98
  • Næss, P. (2011). ‘New urbanism’ or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(1), 25–44. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v4i1.170
  • Næss, P. (2012). Urban form and travel behavior: Experience from a nordic context. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(2), 21–45. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.314
  • Næss, P. (2014). Tempest in a teapot: The exaggerated problem of transport-related residential self-selection as a source of error in empirical studies. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7(3), 57–77. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.491
  • Næss, P. (2015). Residential location and travel behavior. In P. Pinho, & C. Silva (Eds.), Mobility patterns and urban structure (pp. 151–186). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Næss, P., Cao, X., & Strand, A. (2017). Which D’s are the important ones? The effects of regional location and density on driving distance in Oslo and Stavanger. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 945–964. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2017.1183
  • Næss, P., & Jensen, O. B. (2004). Urban structure matters, even in a small town. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(1), 35–57. doi: 10.1080/0964056042000189790
  • Næss, P., Peters, S., Stefansdottir, H., & Strand, A. (2018). Causality, not just correlation: Residential location, transport rationales and travel behavior across metropolitan contexts. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 181–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.003
  • Næss, P., Røe, P. G., & Larsen, S. L. (1995). Travelling distances, modal split and transportation energy in thirty residential areas in Oslo. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38(3), 349–370. doi: 10.1080/09640569512913
  • Næss, P., & Sandberg, S. L. (1996). Workplace location, modal split and energy use for commuting trips. Urban Studies, 33(3), 557–580. doi: 10.1080/00420989650011915
  • Næss, P., Strand, A., Wolday, F., & Stefansdottir, H. (2017). Residential location, commuting and non-work travel in two urban areas of different size and with different center structures. Progress in Planning. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2017.10.002
  • Newman, P. W. G., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1989). Cities and automobile dependence: An international sourcebook. Aldershot: Gower.
  • Nielsen, T. S. (2002). Boliglokalisering og transport i Aalborg (Ph.D. thesis). Aalborg University.
  • Planning for Sustainable Travel. (2018). Jobs-housing balance. Retrieved from http://www.plan4sustainabletravel.org/key_themes/jobs_housing_balance/
  • Røe, P. G. (2001). Storbymenneskets hverdagsreiser. Sammenhenger mellom bosted, livsstil og hverdagsreisepraksis i et senmoderne perspektiv (Dr. Polit. Dissertation). Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim.
  • Saelens, B. E., & Handy, S. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(7 Suppl), S550–S566. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
  • Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F. M., & Diest, M. (2001). Travel behaviour in Dutch monocentric and policentric urban systems. Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 173–186. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00009-6
  • Statistics Norway. (2017). Areal og befolkning i tettsteder, etter tettsted, tid og statistikkvariabel. Table 04859. Oslo: Statistics Norway. Retrieved from https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken
  • Stevens, M. R. (2017). Does compact development make people drive less? Journal of the American Planning Association, 83, 7–18. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1240044
  • Strømmen, K. (2001). Rett virksomhet på rett sted – om virksomheters transportskapende egenskaper (Ph.D. thesis). Norwegian University of Technology and Science.
  • Vale, D. S. (2013). Does commuting time tolerance impede sustainable urban mobility? Analysing the impacts on commuting behaviour as a result of workplace relocation to a mixed-use centre in Lisbon. Journal of Transport Geography, 32, 38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.08.003
  • Van Wee, B. (2013). Land use and transport. In B. van Wee, J. A. Annema, & D. Banister (Eds.), The transport system and transport policy. An introduction (pp. 78–100). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Wolday, F., Cao, X., & Næss, P. (2018). Examining factors that keep residents with high transit preference away from transit-rich zones and associated behavior outcomes. Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.12.009
  • Woods, L., & Ferguson, N. S. (2014). The influence of urban form on car travel following residential relocation: A current and retrospective study in Scottish urban areas. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7(1), 95–104. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v7i1.405
  • Yang, J. (2005). Commuting impacts of spatial decentralization: A comparison of Atlanta and Boston. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 35, 69–78.
  • Yang, J., Shen, Q., Shen, J., & He, C. (2012). Transport impacts of clustered development in Beijing: Compact development versus overconcentration. Urban Studies, 49, 1315–1331. doi: 10.1177/0042098011410336
  • Yang, X., Day, J. E., Langford, B. C., Cherry, C. R., Jones, L. R., Han, S. S., & Sun, J. (2016). Commute responses to employment decentralization: Anticipated versus actual mode choice behaviors of new town employees in kunming, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52(B), 454–470.
  • Zegras, C. (2010). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership & use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 47, 1793–1817. doi: 10.1177/0042098009356125
  • Zhou, B., & Kockelman, K. (2008). Self-selection in home choice: Use of treatment effects in evaluating the relationship between the built environment and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2077, 54–61. doi: 10.3141/2077-08

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.