How outward looking is smart specialisation? Rationales, drivers and barriers

References

• Barca, F. (2009). Agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. Brussels: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., & Dassen, A. (2011). Strengthening global-local connectivity in regional innovation strategies: Implications for regional innovation policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/5kgc6d80nns4-en
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D. (2008). Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 227–239. doi: 10.3152/030234208X287056
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2013). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Toward smart innovation policies. Growth and Change, 44(44), 355–389. doi: 10.1111/grow.12012
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2014). A territorial taxonomy of innovative regions and the European regional policy reform: Smart innovation policies. Scienze Regionali, (1/2014), 69–105. doi: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001005
   Google Scholar
• Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231. doi: 10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2016). Persistence in regional learning paradigms and trajectories: Consequences for innovation policy design. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1587–1604. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1177493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J. (2010). Coordinate to collaborate: The governance challenges for European international S&T policy. In H. Prange (Ed.), International science and technology cooperation in a globalized world: The external dimension of the European research area (pp. 135–160). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS 3). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy ( Vol. 79). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2016). On the policy space of smart specialization strategies. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1428–1437. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1176126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., & Van Ark, B. (2007). Smart specialisation in a truly integrated research area is the key to attracting more R&D to Europe. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 1, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/00343400903389979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Kiriakou, D., Cohen, C., & Przeor, M. (2016). Implementing smart specialisation strategies: A handbook. Seville: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. (2015). Institutions, smart specialisation dynamics and policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 22–37. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15614694
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2016). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Higher Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72(2), 603–633. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(03)00124-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D. (2014). Designing and implementing a smart specialisation strategy at regional level: Some open questions. Scienze Regionali, (1), 107–126. doi: 10.3280/SCRE2014-001006
   Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., & Guzzini, E. (2016). Relatedness and connectivity in technological domains: Missing links in S3 design and implementation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1511–1526. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1170108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93(5), 436–457. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschatzky, K. (2000). A river is a river-cross-border networking between Baden and Alsace. European Planning Studies, 8(4), 429–449. doi: 10.1080/713666422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice—Leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K.-J., & Trippl, M. (2013). Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Regional Studies, 47(3), 450–460. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.560933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundquist, K.-J., & Winther, L. (2006). The interspace between Denmark and Sweden: The industrial dynamics of the Öresund cross-border region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 106(1), 115–129. doi: 10.1080/00167223.2006.10649549
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2016). The early experience of smart specialization implementation in EU cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1407–1427. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1166177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miörner, J., Zukauskaite, E., Trippl, M., & Moodysson, J. (2018). Creating institutional preconditions for knowledge flows in cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 201–218. doi: 10.1177/2399654417704664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., Trippl, M., & Zukauskaite, E. (2015). Policy learning and smart specialization: Exploring strategies for regional industrial change. Retrieved from http://orca.cf.ac.uk/78211/
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2017a). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 569–583. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16645106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2017b). Speaking truth to power: The political dynamics of public sector innovation. In D. Kyriakou (Ed.), Governing smart specialisation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, E., Zenker, A., Hufnagl, M., Héraud, J.-A., Schnabl, E., Makkonen, T., & Kroll, H. (2017). Smart specialisation strategies and cross-border integration of regional innovation systems: Policy dynamics and challenges for the Upper Rhine. Environment and Planning C, 35, 684–702. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16688472
   Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87, 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Regions and innovation collaborating across borders: Collaborating across borders. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, R. (2011). Self-selection bias. In P. J. Lavrakas (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of survey research methods (pp. 809–811). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 97–110. doi: 10.1023/A:1013104805703
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2006). The search for coordination and coherence. In Public policy: Return to the centre? Unpublished. Department of Political Science. University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, A., Dawley, S., & Tomaney, J. (2010). Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1), 59–70. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, H., Fernandez-Esquinas, M., & Uyarra, E. (2015). Universities and knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) as sources of knowledge for innovative firms in peripheral regions. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1873–1891. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.857396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, R. E. (2014). ‘Old wine in new bottles’? Smart specialisation in Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 1(1), 152–157. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2014.944209
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S. (2017). Assessing EU smart specialisation policy in a comparative perspective. In S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, R. Gheorghiu, L. Andreescu, & I. Wade (Eds.), Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization (pp. 2–37). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., & Stancova, K. C. (2018). Internationalising smart specialisation: Assessment and issues in the case of EU new member states. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(1), 263–293. doi: 10.1007/s13132-015-0339-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policies for the twenty-first century. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Severijns, J. (2017). Reflections on regional innovation and research policy from a Limburg perspective. In Severijns (Ed.), Solving contradictions by connectivity, reflections on regional innovation and research policy (pp. 253–270). Maastricht: Province of Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Sörvik, J., & Kleibrink, A. (2015). Mapping innovation priorities and specialisation patterns in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Sorvik, J., Midtkandal, I., Marzocchi, C., & Uyarra, E. (2016). How outward looking is smart specialisation? (S3 Policy Brief Series 16/2016). JRC Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2018). Smart specialization and place leadership: Dreaming about shared visions, falling into policy traps? Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 190–203.
   Google Scholar
• Szerb, L., Ács, Z., Autio, E., Ortega-Argilés, R., & Komlósi, É. (2013). The regional entrepreneurship and development index – Measuring regional entrepreneurship. Retrieved from http://real.mtak.hu/21512/
   Google Scholar
• Trippl, M. (2010). Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 101(2), 150–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2010). From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(4), 681–695. doi: 10.1068/c0961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., Sörvik, J., & Midtkandal, I. (2014). Inter-regional collaboration in research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). Seville, Spain: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, J., Benneworth, P., & Rutten, R. (2018). Border blocking effects in collaborative firm innovation. European Planning Studies, 26, 1330–1346. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1476470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broek, J., & Smulders, H. (2015). Institutional hindrances in cross-border regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 116–122. doi: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1007158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar