Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes

References

• Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.543126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., & Clower, T. (2014). Mobilizing leadership in cities and regions. Regional studies. Regional Science, 1(1), 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P. (2007). Leading innovation: Building effective regional coalitions for innovation. London: National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. Retrieved from www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/leading_innovation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., & Karlsen, J. (2017). Strategic agency and institutional change: Investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs). Regional Studies, 51(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekholt, P., Arnold, E., & Tsipouri, L. (1998). The evaluation of the pre-pilot actions under Article 10: Innovative Measures regarding Regional Technology Plans. Retrieved from http://www.innovating-regions.org/download/RTPreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CIRA. (2014). Estratégia de Desenvolvimento Territorial da Região de Aveiro 2014–2020. Aveiro: Comunidade Intermunicipal da Região de Aveiro.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2005). Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation exploring ‘globalisation 2’—A new model of industry organisation. Research Policy, 34, 1128–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Rosa Pires, A. R., Pinho, L., & Cunha, C. (2012). Universities, communities and regional innovation strategies. Paper presented at the 18th APDR Congress: Innovation and Regional Dynamics, Faro, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2015). Smart specialisation: Challenges and opportunities for regional innovation policies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2016). On the policy space of smart specialization strategies. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1428–1437. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1176126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GLLEP. (2016). EU structural and investment strategy, 2014–2020, April 2016 refresh. Retrieved from https://www.greaterlincolnshirelep.co.uk/assets/documents/EU_SIF_28Structural_Investment_Fund29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grillitisch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2018). Regional growth paths: From structure to agency and back. Papers in Innovation Studies, (2018, 01). Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2001). The regional mission - the regional contribution of higher education. East Midlands: Innovation through diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J. (2006). Silicon somewhere? Assessing the usefulness of best practices in regional policy. Policy Studies, 27(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/01442870500499934
   Google Scholar
• IRE. (2007). Management of a RIS project: Lessons from 10 years’ experience. RIS methodological guide: Stage 2. Luxembourg: IRE Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355–370. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B. (1993). Designing supportive contexts for emerging enterprises. In C. Karlsson, B. Johannisson, & D. Storey (Eds.), Small business dynamics (pp. 117–142). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks. Strategies for the public sector (1st ed). London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., & Nauwelaers, C. (Eds.). (2003). Regional innovation strategies: The challenge for less-favoured regions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nieth, L., & Benneworth, P. (2018). Future perspectives on universities and peripheral regional development. In P. Benneworth (Ed.), Universities and regional economic development – engaging with the periphery (pp. 194–208). Abingdon: Routledge. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Song, M., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 1–18. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.73.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeneris Consulting. (2017). The social, cultural & economic contribution of the University of Lincoln - A Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C., & Melo, A. I. (2013). The triple helix model as inspiration for local development policies: An experience-based perspective: The triple helix model and local development in Portugal. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1675–1687. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C., & Teles, F. (2017). The fourth helix in smart specialsiation strategies: The gap between discourse and practice. In S. De Oliveira Monteiro, & E. Carayannis (Eds.), The quadruple innovation helix nexus: A smart growth model, quantitative empirical validation and operationalization for OECD countries (pp. 111–136). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. doi: 10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005). Entrepreneurial logics for a technology of foolishness. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 385–406. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.009
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and New technological path creation in the danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20(5), 753–772. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socintec. (2004). Ex-post evaluation of the RIS, RTTs and RISI ERDF innovative actions for the period 1994–99. Luxembourg: Socintec.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2004). Strategy development in learning cities: From classical rhetoric towards dynamic capabilities. SENTE-Working Papers 8/2004, University of Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2016). Leadership and the city: Power, strategy and networks in the making of knowledge cities. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2018). Smart Specialisation, Shared Vision and Policy Traps. Sente Working Papers, 40/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H., Yun, S., Lee, J., & Phillips, F. (2015). Entrepreneurship in East Asian Regional Innovation Systems: Role of social capital, Technological Forecasting & Social Change. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.028
   Google Scholar