Smart specialization as a strategy to develop early-stage regional innovation systems

References

• Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Vang, J. (2005). Regional innovation system policy: A knowledge-based approach. Paper no. 2005/13, Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE) Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2004). Understanding regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5(3), 299–330. doi: 10.1080/09654319708720402
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 131–140. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720451
   Google Scholar
• Aydalot, P. (1986). Milieux Innovateurs en Europe. Paris: GREMI.
   Google Scholar
• Bagnasco, A. (1977). Tre Italia: La Problematica Territoriale Dello Sviluppo Economico Italiano. Bologna: Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2018). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becattini, G. (Ed.). (1987). Mercato e Forze Locali: Il Distretto Industriale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchet, M., & Parilla, J. (2017). Getting smart on U.S. regional inequality: Lessons from Europe. The Avenue, Friday, October 27, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchrara, M. (1987). L’industrialisation rampante: Ampleur, mecanismes et portee. Economie et Humanisme, 297, 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Brusco, S. (1986). Small firms and industrial districts: The experience of Italy. In D. Keeble, & E. Weaver (Eds.), New firms and regional development in Europe (pp. 184–201). London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T. G., & Coe, N. M. (2001). Spaces and scales of innovation. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 569–589. doi: 10.1191/030913201682688940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capello, R., & Kroll, H. (2016). From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393–1406. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivu, L., Ciutacu, C., & Georgescu, G. (2017). Impacts of Romania’s deindustrialization on labour market and productivity. In Deindustrialization and reindustrialization in Romania (pp. 101–133). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: Origins of the concept. In H. Braczyk, P. Cooke, & M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional innovation systems (pp. 2–25). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2004). The role of research in regional innovation systems: New models meeting knowledge economy demands. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(3/4/5/6), 507–533. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2004.005307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 475–491.
   Google Scholar
• David, P. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2014). Romania: Corporate R&D report.
   Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2004). Regional innovation systems: A critical synthesis. United Nations University Discussion Paper Series. Paper No. 2004–17. August 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London/Washington: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, M. J. (1999). Regional clusters and firm strategy. In A. Chandler, O. Solvell & P. Hagstrom (Eds.), The dynamic firm (pp. 315–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017). European Innovation Scoreboard 2017. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/24829
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/30281
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2013). The economic fundamentals of smart specialisation. Ekonomiaz, 83(2), 54–81.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foray D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation – the concept, knowledge economists policy brief n° 9 June 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2010). How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems? The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1), 87–108. doi: 10.1007/s00168-009-0292-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheorghiu, R., Gheorghe, D., & Roman, I. (2014), Romania: Towards an RDI strategy with a strong smart specialization component. Dublin, 3–4 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2005). How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 521–535. doi: 10.1080/09654310500107134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, H. (2015). Efforts to implement smart specialization in practice—leading unlike horses to the water. European Planning Studies, 23(10), 2079–2098. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.1003036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. (1998). Will new regionalism survive? Tracing dominant concepts in economic geography, Discussion Paper, Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2000). Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 21(3), 487–513. doi: 10.1177/0170840600213001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. (2002). Alternative societal models of learning and innovation in the knowledge economy. International Social Science Journal, 54, 67–82. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00360
   Google Scholar
• Lambooy, J. G., & Boschma, R. A. (2001). Evolutionary economics and regional policy. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(1), 113–131. doi: 10.1007/s001680000033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. (2010). Global knowledge and creativity: New challenges for firms and regions. Regional Studies, 44(8), 1033–1052. doi: 10.1080/00343400903108676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Moodysson, J. (2013). Comparing knowledge bases: On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 170–187. doi: 10.1177/0969776411427326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Trippl, M. (2014). System failures, knowledge bases and regional innovation policies. DISP, 50(1), 24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (1999). Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 167–185. doi: 10.1093/cje/23.2.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 409–427. doi: 10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0052
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). The transatlantic productivity gap: A survey of the main causes. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(3), 395–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00725.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, C. (2014). Deindustrialization and urban shrinkage in Romania. What lessons for the spatial policy? Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 10(42), 181–202.
   Google Scholar
• Radosevic, S., & Ciampi Stancova, K. (2018). Internationalising smart specialisation: Assessment and issues in the case of EU New member states. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(1), 263–293. doi: 10.1007/s13132-015-0339-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riba Vilanova, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2001). Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system. Scientometrics, 50(2), 215–240. doi: 10.1023/A:1010517505793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, M. (2014). Innovation, knowledge spillovers and high-tech services in European regions. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 25(1), 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., Di Cataldo, M., & Rainoldi, A. (2014). The role of Government Institutions for Smart Specialisation and Regional Development, S3 Policy Brief Series No. 04/2014.
   Google Scholar
• Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (1988). The geographical foundations and social regulation of flexible production complexes. In J. Wolch & M. Dear (Eds.), The power of geography (pp. 21–40). London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., & Trippl, M. (2006). Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 1035–1058. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar