Values for self-build urbanism

References

• Albrecht, J. (1988). Towards a Theory of participation in Architecture—An Examination of Humanistic planning Theories. Journal of Architectural Education, 42(1), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Alfasi, N. (2017). The coding turn in urban planning: Could it remedy the essential drawbacks of planning? Planning Theory, 17(3), 375–395. doi: 10.1177/1473095217716206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfasi, N., & Portugali, J. (2004). Planning Just-in-time versus planning Just-in-case. Cities (london, England), 21(1), 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfasi, N., & Portugali, J. (2007). Planning rules for a self-planned city. Planning Theory, 6(2), 164–182. doi: 10.1177/1473095207077587
   Google Scholar
• Bajracharya, B., & Khan, S. (2010). Evolving governance model for community building: Collaborative Partnerships in Master planned communities. Urban Policy and Research, 28(4), 471–485. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2010.520644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J., Jackson, R., & Meikle, J. (2001). Homes to DIY for: The UK's self-build housing market in the twenty-first century. Joseph Rowntree Foundation/YPS.
   Google Scholar
• Bayulken, B., & Huisingh, D. (2015). Are lessons from eco-towns helping planners make more effective progress in transforming cities into sustainable urban systems: A literature review (part 2 of 2). Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 152–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchetti, C., & Sampieri, A. (2014). Can shared practices build a new city? Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 38(1), 73–79. doi: 10.3846/20297955.2014.895416
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, D., Salet, W., & Majoor, S. (2018). Commissioning as the cornerstone of self-build. Assessing the constraints and opportunities of self-build housing in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 77, 524–533. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, R. (2016). Who decides and Who provides? The Anarchistic housing practices of John Turner as Realizations of Henri Lefebvre’s Autogestive space. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 41(2), 83–97. doi: 10.1177/0304375416684856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broer, S., & Titheridge, H. (2010). Eco-Self-Build housing communities: Are they Feasible and Can they lead to sustainable and Low Carbon lifestyles? Sustainability, 2, 2084–2116. doi: 10.3390/su2072084
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (2008). Designing differently: The self-build home. Journal of Design History, 21(4), 359–370. doi: 10.1093/jdh/epn033
   Google Scholar
• Burton, B / Centre for Housing Policy. (2015). Self-Build report: How local authorities Can Support self-build. The University of York / Centre for Housing Policy. Retrieved from https://www.york.ac.uk/media/chp/documents/2015/SelfBuildReportforCYC2015intern.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. (2009). Design Coding and the Creative, market and regulatory Tyrannies of practice. Urban Studies, 46(12), 2643–2667. doi: 10.1177/0042098009344226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., Marshall, S., & Stevens, Q. (2006). Design codes: Their use and potential. Progress in Planning, 65(4), 209–289. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2006.03.008
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. (2007). Unpacking new labour's ‘urban renaissance’ agenda: Towards a socially sustainable reurbanization of British cities? Planning, Practice & Research, 22(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/02697450701455249
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, O. (2017). Parametric design in urbanism: A critical Reflection. Planning Practice & Research, 28, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government / Homes & Communities Agency. (2012). Custom build homes Fund Prospectus. London: Homes & Communities Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. (2005). Preparing design codes: A practice Manual. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. (2011). Laying the Foundation: A housing strategy for England. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. S., & Rowe, A. (1993). Self-provided housing: The first World's Hidden housing Arm. Urban Studies, 30(8), 1331–1354. doi: 10.1080/00420989320081291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. (2014). Process and principles in urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 47–48. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2014.854680
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1998). Response of the Expert group on the urban environment to the communication ‘towards an urban agenda in the European union’. Brussels: EC.
   Google Scholar
• Field, M. (2018). Models of self-build and collaborative housing in the United Kingdom. In M. Benson, & I. Hamiduddin (Eds.), Self-build homes: Social discourse, experience and directions (pp. 38–55). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forde, E. (2018). From cultures of resistance to the new social movements: DIY self-build in West Wales. In M. Benson, & I. Hamiduddin (Eds.), Self-build homes: Social discourse, experience and directions (pp. 81–95). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gierszon, M. (2014). Architect-activist. The socio-political attitude based on the works of Walter Segal. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 38(1), 54–62. doi: 10.3846/20297955.2014.893629
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1989). Arcadia for some: The strange story of autonomous housing. Housing Studies, 4(3), 149–154. doi: 10.1080/02673038908720655
   Google Scholar
• Hamiduddin, I. (2018). Community building: Self-build and the neighbourhood commons. In M. Benson, & I. Hamiduddin (Eds.), Self-build homes: Social discourse, experience and directions (pp. 17–37). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamiduddin, I., & Gallent, N. (2016). Self-build communities: The rationale and experiences of group-build (baugruppen) housing development in Germany. Housing Studies, 31(4), 365–383. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1091920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (1999). Slipping through the Cracks: The Origins of Aided self-help housing, 1918–53. Housing Studies, 14(3), 281–309. doi: 10.1080/02673039982803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, E., & de Wilde, P. (2018). Something wonderful in my backyard: The social impetus for group self-building. In M. Benson, & I. Hamiduddin (Eds.), Self-build homes: Social discourse, experience and directions (pp. 174–191). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. R. (1999). Self-help housing in the Weimar Republic: The work of Ernst May. Housing Studies, 14(3), 311–328. doi: 10.1080/02673039982812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2015). Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding Act.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkirk, E. (2011). The Netherlands’ Almere leads the way on self-build communities. Retrieved from http://www.bdonline.co.uk/the-netherlands-almere-leads-the-way-on-selfbuild-communities/5019196.article
   Google Scholar
• Hutson, S., & Jones, S. (2002). Community self-build for young homeless people: Problems and potential. Housing Studies, 17(4), 639–656. doi: 10.1080/02673030220144385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Stoeger, H. (2018). The role of the local institutional context in understanding collaborative housing models: Empirical evidence from Austria. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 35–54. doi: 10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. G., Peel, D., & Janssen-Jansen, L. B. (2015). Self-build in the UK and Netherlands: Mainstreaming self-development to address housing shortages? Urban, Planning and Transport Research: An Open Access Journal, 3(1), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association / Planning Advisory Service. (2016). Planning for self- and Custom-build housing. London: Local Government Association.
   Google Scholar
• Medved, P. (2016). A contribution to the structural model of autonomous sustainable neighbourhoods: New socio-economical basis for sustainable urban planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehaffy, M. W. (2008). Generative methods in urban design: A progress assessment. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1(1), 57–75. doi: 10.1080/17549170801903678
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. (2013). Participation: Housing and urban viability. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 37(3), 218–225. doi: 10.3846/20297955.2013.832483
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D. (2010). Self-help housing: could it play a greater role? Working Paper 11. Third Sector Research Centre. University of Birmingham. Retrieved from https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tsrc/documents/tsrc/working-papers/working-paper-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nederhand, J., Bekkers, V., & Voorberg, W. (2016). Self-Organization and the role of Government: How and why does self-organization evolve in the shadow of hierarchy? Public Management Review, 18(7), 1063–1084. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1066417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novy, K. (2012). Self-help as a Reform movement: The Struggle of the Viennese settlers after World War I. In E. Krasny (Ed.), Hand-on urbanism 1850–2012: The right to green (pp. 126–159). Vienna: Architekturzentrum Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, V. (1984). Design for the real World. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Parvin, A., Saxby, D., Cerulli, C., & Schneider, T. (2011). A right to build: The next mass-housebuilding industry. Sheffield: University of Sheffield. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/alastairparvin/docs/2011_07_06_arighttobuild
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, B., Strutt, J., & Vine, J. (2011). Self-Help housing: Supporting locally driven housing solutions. Building and Social Housing Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tsrc/documents/tsrc/reports/self-help-housing-consultation-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Portschy, S. (2016). Community participation in sustainable urban growth, case study of Almere, the Netherlands. Pollack Periodica, 11(1), 145–155. doi: 10.1556/606.2016.11.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2007). Urban renaissance: Securing sustainable communities – Citizen, safety and sustainability in the new urban planning. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(4), 305–320. doi: 10.1177/0969776407081164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauws, W. (2016). Civic initiatives in urban development: Self-governance versus self-organisation in planning practice. Town Planning Review, 87(3), 339–361. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2016.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, K., & Fernández Arrigoitia, M. (2015). Development of new cohousing: Lessons from a London scheme for the over-50s. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 106–121. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2015.1011430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheurer, J., & Newman, P. (2009). Vauban: A European Model Bridging the Green and Brown Agendas. Case study prepared for the and Green Agendas Page. Global Report on Human Settlements 2009. Retrieved from http://www.unhabitat.org/grhs/2009
   Google Scholar
• Schoenwitz, M., Naim, M., & Potter, A. (2012). The nature of choice in mass customized house building. Construction Management and Economics, 30(3), 203–219. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2012.664277
   Google Scholar
• Schroepfer, T., & Hee, L. (2008). Emerging forms of sustainable urbanism: Case studies of Vauban Freiburg and solarCity Linz. Journal of Green Building, 3(2), 65–76. doi: 10.3992/jgb.3.2.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, T. (2018). Turning the theory into reality. In M. Benson, & I. Hamiduddin (Eds.), Self-build homes: Social discourse, experience and directions. UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, E., & Olmedo, C. (2015). Informality on the urban periphery: Housing conditions and self-help strategies in Texas informal subdivisions. Urban Studies, 52(6), 1037–1053. doi: 10.1177/0042098014533733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen AICP, E. (2009). Design by the rules: The historical Underpinnings of form-based codes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(2), 144–160. doi: 10.1080/01944360802686662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toker, T., & Pontikis, K. (2011). An inclusive and generative design process for sustainable urbanism: The case of Pacoima. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 4(1), 57–80. doi: 10.1080/17549175.2011.559956
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. F. C. (2009:1976). Hosing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments. London: Maryon Boyars Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Task Force. (1999). Towards an urban renaissance – Final report of the urban Task Force Chaired by Lord Rogers of Riverside. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeman, R. (1999). Reconstruction and the self-help housing movement: The French experience. Housing Studies, 14(3), 355–366. doi: 10.1080/02673039982849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, A., Ford, J., & Quilgars, D. (2013). Build-it-yourself? Understanding the Changing Landscape of the UK self-builds market. York: Centre for Housing Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, P. M., & Peters, P. A. (2007). Self-help housing and informal homesteading in peri-urban America: Settlement identification using digital imagery and GIS. Habitat International, 31, 205–218. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar