Spatial imaginaries and institutional change in planning: the case of the Mersey Belt in north-west England

References

• Albrechts, L., Healey, P., & Kunzmann, K. (2003). Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 113–129. doi: 10.1080/01944360308976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 617–633. doi: 10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J.-A. (2007). Making new political spaces: Mobilizing spatial imaginaries, instrumentalizing spatial practices, and strategically using spatial tools. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(11), 2593–2611. doi: 10.1068/a39228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Lagendijk, A., & Jacobs, W. (2007). A theory of institutional change: Illustrated by Dutch city-provinces and Dutch land policy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(4), 891–908. doi: 10.1068/a38191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Futures Network. (2017). Towards a common future, a new agenda for England and the UK: Interim prospectus of the common futures network. London: Common Futures Network.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. (2009). Space and place in twentieth century planning: An analytical framework and an historical review. In S. Davoudi, & I. Strange (Eds.), Conceptions of space and place in strategic spatial planning (pp. 7–42). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I., Haughton, G., & Hincks, S. (2014). A good geography is whatever it needs to be: The Atlantic Gateway and evolving spatial imaginaries in North West England. In P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling, & F. Othengrafen (Eds.), Soft spaces in Europe: Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 25–44). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dembski, S. (2015). Structure and imagination of changing cities: Manchester, Liverpool and the spatial in-between. Urban Studies, 52(9), 1647–1664. doi: 10.1177/0042098014539021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembski, S., & Salet, W. (2010). The transformative potential of institutions: How symbolic markers can institute new social meaning in changing cities. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(3), 611–625. doi: 10.1068/a42184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). (1997). Building partnerships for prosperity: Sustainable growth, competitiveness and employment in the English regions. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2004). The form, style, and use of cartographic visualisations in European spatial planning: Examples from England and Germany. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36(11), 1961–1989. doi: 10.1068/a35262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ExUrbe. (2013). Peel and the Liverpool City-region: Predatory capitalism or providential corporatism? Liverpool: ExUrbe.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2005). The Netherlands: A culture with a soft spot for planning. In B. Sanval (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 442–454). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2005). Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning, 64(3), 183–234. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2005.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, P. (1915). Cities in evolution: An introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics. London: Williams and Norgate.
   Google Scholar
• Government Office North West (GONW). (1996). Regional planning guidance 13 for the North West. London: Department of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, G. (1996). The spatial imaginary of national practices: Dwelling—Domesticating /Being—Exterminating. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14(4), 463–485. doi: 10.1068/d140463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In F. Fischer, & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–76). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A., Marvin, S., & Robson, B. (2006). A framework for city-regions. London: ODPM.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2012). Life after regions? The evolution of city-regionalism in England. Regional Studies, 46(9), 1243–1259. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2010.521148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2014). The rise of the non-state ‘place-based’ economic development strategy. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29(4/5), 453–468. doi: 10.1177/0269094214533650
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2015). Fluid spatial imaginaries: Evolving estuarial city-regional spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(5), 857–873. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2015). Spatial imaginaries, urban dynamics and political community. Planning Theory and Practice, 16(2), 266–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincks, S., Deas, I., & Haughton, G. (2017). Real geographies, real economies and soft spatial imaginaries: Creating a ‘more than Manchester’ region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 642–657. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, & Communities and Local Government. (2007). Review of sub-national economic development and regeneration. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2014). Autumn statement 2014. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O. B., & Richardson, T. (2003). Being on the map: The new iconographies of power over European space. International Planning Studies, 8(1), 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2012). Cultural political economy, spatial imaginaries, regional economic dynamics. CPERC Working Paper 2012-02. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing socio-spatial relations. Environment and Planning D, 26(3), 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. (1996). Euro-megalopolis or theme park Europe? Scenarios for European spatial development. International Planning Studies, 1(2), 143–163.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, N. (2017). Powerhouse of cards? Understanding the Northern Powerhouse. Regional Studies, 51(3), 478–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverpool City Region. (n.d.). Statement of cooperation on local planning. Retrieved from Liverpool City Region website: http://liverpoolcityregion-ca.gov.uk/uploadedfiles/documents/Appendix_One_Statement_of_Co-operation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2014). Is planning ‘under attack’? Chronicling the deregulation of urban and environmental planning in England. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Schmitt, P. (2012). When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Environment and Planning A, 44(2), 263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morphet, J., & Pemberton, S. (2013). ‘Regions out – sub-regions in’: Can sub-regional planning break the mould? The view from England. Planning Practice and Research, 28(4), 384–399.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (1996). Images as institution builders: Metropolitan planning in Madrid. European Planning Studies, 4(3), 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2007). How institutions and individuals use plans: Planning cultures and images of futures. In L. D. Hopkins, & M. A. Zapata (Eds.), Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans and projects (pp. 155–174). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2010). The imaginative institution: Planning and governance in Madrid. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. (2012). The image of the institution. The Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(2), 139–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North West Development Agency (NWDA). (2000). England’s North West: A Strategy Towards 2020. Warrington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North West Development Agency (NWDA). (2007). Spatial hypothesis for the single regional strategy. Warrington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North West Development Agency (NWDA). (2008). Comments on the spatial hypothesis for the single regional strategy. Warrington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North West Development Agency (NWDA). (2010a). Atlantic gateway: Accelerating growth across the Manchester and Liverpool City-regions – Framework for a global growth opportunity. Warrington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North West Development Agency (NWDA). (2010b). RS 2010: Regional strategy for England’s North West. Part 1 – The high level framework: Consultation report. Warrington: Author.
   Google Scholar
• North West Joint Planning Team. (1974). Strategic plan for the North West. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• North West Regional Association. (1993). Greener growth: Draft advice on regional planning guidance for North West England. Wigan: NWRA.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., Sykes, O., & Shaw, D. (2017). Evolving conceptions of regional policy in Europe and their influence across different territorial scales. In I. Deas, & S. Hincks (Eds.), Territorial policy and governance: Alternative paths (pp. 35–52). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). (2003). Regional planning guidance for the North West, RPG 13. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). (2004). Making it happen: The northern way. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F., & Reimer, M. (2013). The embeddedness of planning in cultural contexts: Theoretical foundations for the analysis of dynamic planning cultures. Environment and Planning A, 45(6), 1269–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, G., & Ayres, S. (2007). Emerging patterns of governance in the English regions: The role of regional assemblies. Regional Studies, 41(5), 699–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel Group. (2009). Ocean gateway: Prospectus. Manchester: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). (1990). North West 2010: The pressing case for strategic planning. Liverpool: RTPI North West Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Senior, D. (1974). Structural realities. Built Environment, 3(9), 450–451.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the Unites States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., & Phelps, N. A. (2018). Framing the future: On local planning cultures and legacies. Planning Theory and Practice, 19(5), 698–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Duinan, L. (2013). Mainport and corridor: Exploring the mobilizing capacities of Dutch spatial concepts. Planning Theory and Practice, 14(2), 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Varró, K. (2014). Spatial imaginaries of the Dutch-German-Belgian borderlands: A multidimensional analysis of cross-border regional governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2235–2255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannop, U. (1995). The regional imperative: Regional planning and governance in Britain in the 1990s. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wannop, U., & Cherry, G. E. (1994). The development of regional planning in the United Kingdom. Planning Perspectives, 9(1), 29–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., & Jonas, A. (2004). Competitive city-regionalism as a politics of space: A critical reinterpretation of the new regionalism. Environment and Planning A, 36(12), 2119–2139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. (2014). Spatial imaginaries research in geography: Synergies, tensions, and new directions. Geography Compass, 9(9), 508–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W., & Waterhout, B. (2005). Visions on territorial cohesion. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 15–27.
   Google Scholar