De-democratising the Irish planning system

References

• ABP. (2017, June). Strategic housing development planning applications. An Bord Pleanála (ABP). Retrieved from http://www.pleanala.ie/shd/general/overview/Strategic%20Housing%20Developments%20-%20Overview.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2012). Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37, 89–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2013a). The evolution and trajectories of English spatial governance: ‘Neoliberal’ episodes in planning. Planning Practice & Research, 28, 6–26. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699223
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2013b). The evolution and trajectory of English spatial governance: ‘Neoliberal’ episodes in planning. Planning Practice & Research, 28, 6–26. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699223
   Google Scholar
• Boland, P. (2014). The relationship between spatial planning and economic competitiveness: The ‘path to economic nirvana’ or a ‘dangerous obsession’? Environment and Planning A, 26, 770–787. doi: 10.1068/a4687
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (1996). Controlling development: Certainty and discretion in Europe, the USA and Hong Kong. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Towards deep neoliberalisation. In J. Künkel & M. Mayer (Eds.), Neoliberal urbanism and its contestations: crossing theoretical boundaries (pp. 27–45). London: Palgrave Mcmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34, 349–379. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York City, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., & Norris, M. (2018). Procyclical social housing and the crisis of Irish housing policy: Marketization, social housing, and the property boom and bust. Housing Policy Debate, 28, 50–63. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2016.1257999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Statistics Office (CSO). (2018). Residential property price index - July 2018. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, R. S., & Mcbeth, M. K. (2009). Public policy Praxis: A case approach for understanding policy and analysis. Essex: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., & Owens, S. (2006). Governing space: Planning reform and the politics of sustainability. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 403–421. doi: 10.1068/c0416j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and US foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, C. (2008). The power of words in international relations: Birth of an anti-whaling discourse. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (1991). Promoting economic development: Urban planning in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57, 22–33. doi: 10.1080/01944369108975469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falleth, E., & Saglie, I. (2011). Democracy or efficiency: Contradictory national guidelines in urban planning in Norway. Urban Research & Practice, 4, 58–71. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2011.550541
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. S. (1989). Order without design: Information production and policy making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2014). Informal strategies of power in the local planning system. Planning Theory, 13, 244–268. doi: 10.1177/1473095213492512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., Murphy, E., & Grist, B. (2011). Legislative change in Ireland: A Marxist political economy critique of planning law. Town Planning Review, 82, 639–668. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2011.37
   Google Scholar
• Grist, B. (2001). Curtailment of third party planning appeals in the Republic of Ireland. Scottish Planning and Environmental Law, 86, 80–82.
   Google Scholar
• Grist, B. (2004). Planning. In M. Callanan & J. Keogan (Eds.), Local government in Ireland: Inside out (pp. 221–252). Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Grist, B. (2008). The planning and development (Strategic Infrastructure Act - one year on). Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal, 15, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Laws, D. (2006). Ordering through discourse. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 409–424). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7, 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2011). The neo-liberal revolution. Cultural Studies, 25, 705–728. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2011.619886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herweg, N., Zahariadis, N., & Zohlnhöfer, R. (2018). The multiple streams framework: Foundations, refinements, and empirical applications. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 17–53). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., Peterson, H. L., Pierce, J. J., Herweg, N., Bernal, A., Lamberta Raney, H., & Zahariadis, N. (2016). A River runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Studies Journal, 44, 13–36. doi: 10.1111/psj.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, T. (1993). Reading policy narratives: Beginnings, middles and ends. In F. Fischer & J. Forrest (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 167–185). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives and public politics. New York City, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., O’Callaghan, C., Boyle, M., Gleeson, J., & Keaveney, K. (2012). Placing neoliberalism: The rise and fall of Ireland's Celtic Tiger. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1302–1326. doi: 10.1068/a44349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (1985). Arguments for and against planning. Town Planning Review, 1, 5–20. doi: 10.3828/tpr.56.1.e8286q3082111km4
   Google Scholar
• Knaggård, Å. (2015). The multiple streams framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54, 450–465. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., & Winkel, G. (2017). Discoursive agency: (Re-)Conceptualising actors and practices in the analysis of discursive policymaking. Policy Studies Journal, 45, 510–534. doi: 10.1111/psj.12172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2014). Presentation and persuasion: The meaning of evidence in Irish green infrastructure policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10, 167–186. doi: 10.1332/174426414X13935916947767
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2015). Explaining the currency of novel policy concepts: Learning from green infrastructure planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 1039–1057. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15605939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2015). Contending expertise: An interpretive approach to (Re)conceiving wind power’s ‘planning problem’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17, 593–611. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2017). Opportunity or threat: Dissecting tensions in a post-carbon rural transition. Sociologia Ruralis, 57, 87–109. doi: 10.1111/soru.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2014). Is planning “under attack”? Chronicling the deregulation of urban and environmental planning in England. European Planning Studies, 22, 345–361. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.741574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2018). Getting the planners off our backs: Questioning the post-political nature of English planning policy. Planning Practice & Research, 33, 229–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, H. (2018). Has planning been de-democratised in Sydney? Geographical Research, 56, 230–240. doi: 10.1111/1745-5871.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercille, J., & Murphy, E. (2015). Deepening neoliberalism, austerity, and crisis: Europe’s treasure Ireland. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMilan.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 649–667. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008). European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. Disp-The Planning Review, 44, 35–47. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• Norris, M. (2016). Varieties of home ownership: Ireland’s transition from a socialised to a marketised policy regime. Housing Studies, 31, 81–101. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1061107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K., & Carter, H. (2018). Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish planning act. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36, 689–707. doi: 10.1177/2399654417719285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., & Doak, J. (2012). Competitiveness. Key concepts in planning. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• PII. (2019). About property industry Ireland. Retrieved from https://www.propertyindustry.ie/Sectors/PII/PII.nsf/vPages/About_us~about-us!OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• Rawat, P., & Morris, J. C. (2016). Kingdon’s “streams” model at thirty: Still relevant in the 21st Century? Politics & Policy, 44, 608–638. doi: 10.1111/polp.12168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, L. (2018). Networks and problem recognition: Advancing the multiple streams approach. Policy Sciences, 51, 457–476. doi: 10.1007/s11077-018-9330-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roodbol-Mekkes, P. H., & van den brink, A. (2015). Rescaling spatial planning: Spatial planning reforms in Denmark, England and the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 184–198. doi: 10.1068/c12134
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H. (2009). Putting SEA in context: A discourse perspective on how SEA contributes to decision-making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 200–209. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. (2013). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. New York City, NY: Farrar, Srraus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 281–300. doi: 10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York City, NY: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (1993). Survey research as rhetorical trope: Electric power planning arguements in Chicago. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The arguementative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 117–144). London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiernan, A., & Burke, T. (2002). A load of old garbage: Applying garbage–can theory to contemporary housing policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61, 86–97. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.00287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2007). Interpretation and intention in policy analysis. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods (pp. 429–442). Boco Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, R. (in press). Financialization, urban governance and the planning system: Utilizing ‘development viability’ as a policy narrative for the liberalization of Ireland’s post-crash planning system. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12789
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, R., & Redmond, D. (2014). The extent of the mortgage crisis in Ireland and policy responses. Housing Studies, 29, 149–165. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2013.825694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013). Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany and the Netherlands: An exploration. Planning Practice & Research, 28, 141–159. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.699261
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R., & O’Neill-Kohl, S. (2013). The historical roots of tax increment financing, or how real estate consultants kept urban renewal alive. Economic Development Quarterly, 27, 193–207. doi: 10.1177/0891242413487018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2016). The real estate bubble in Ireland. Policy Context and Responses. Urban Research & Practice, 9, 204–218. doi: 10.1080/17535069.2016.1174401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York City, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Winkel, G., & Leipold, S. (2016). Demolishing dikes: Multiple streams and policy discourse analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 44, 108–129. doi: 10.1111/psj.12136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N. (2003). Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zohlnhöfer, R., Herweg, N., & Rüb, F. (2015). Theoretically refining the multiple streams framework: An introduction. European Journal of Political Research, 54, 412–418. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar