Measuring territorial cohesion is not a mission impossible

References

• Abrahams, G. (2014). What “is” territorial cohesion? What does it “do”?: Essentialist versus pragmatic approaches to using concepts. European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2134–2155. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.819838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, N., Cotella, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). The engagement of territorial knowledge communities with European spatial planning and the territorial cohesion debate: A Baltic perspective. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 712–734. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadis, S. (2017). Territorial cohesion and prospects for sustainable development: A co-integration analysis. Habitat International, 68, 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Doucet, P., Komornicki, T., Zaucha, J., & Świątek, D. (2011). How to strengthen the territorial dimension of “Europe 2020” and EU cohesion policy. Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., & Gløersen, E. (2011). Territorial cohesion storylines: Understanding a policy concept. Spatial Foresight Briefing 2011:1. Luxembourg: Spatial Foresight. Retrieved from www.spatialforesight.eu
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Holstein, F., & Toptsidou, M. (2015). Report on the assessment of territorial cohesion and the territorial agenda 2020 of the European Union. Luxembourg: Spatial Foresight.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J., & Zaucha, J. (Eds.). (2017). Territorial cohesion: A missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger (pp. 251). Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320700583_Territorial_Cohesion_A_missing_link_between_economic_growth_and_welfare_Lessons_from_the_Baltic_Tiger
   Google Scholar
• Brodzicki, T., & Ciolek, D. (2017). Territorial capital and Polish regional development. In J. Bradley & J. Zaucha (Eds.), Territorial cohesion: A missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger (pp. 147–168). Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320700583_Territorial_Cohesion_A_missing_link_between_economic_growth_and_welfare_Lessons_from_the_Baltic_Tiger
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (2007). Territorial development policies in the European model of society. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 129–144). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2001). Unity, solidarity, diversity of Europe, its people and its territory: Second report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2004). A new partnership for cohesion: Convergence, competitiveness, co-operation. Third report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2005). European values in the globalised world. Contribution of the Commission to the October Meeting of Heads of State and Government. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2005) 525 final/2 Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2007). Growing regions, growing Europe: Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2008). Green paper on territorial cohesion turning territorial diversity into strength. COM(2008) 616 final Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2010). Investing in Europe’s future: Fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2014). Investment for jobs and growth. Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities. Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2017). My region, my Europe, our future. Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Charron, N., Dijkstra L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90.
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C., & Santinha, G. (2014). European Union competition policy and the European territorial cohesion agenda: an impossible reconciliation? State aid rules and public service liberalization through the European spatial planning lens. European Planning Studies, 22(3), 459–480. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.744384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damsgaard, O., Greve Harbo, L., Lindberg, G., Zaucha, J., Hanell, T., Schürmann, C., … Noorkõiv, R. (2012). ESPON BSR-TeMo. Territorial monitoring for the Baltic Sea Region. Interim report Version 30/11/2012. Scientific Platform and Tools Project 2013/3/9. Luxemburg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2005). Understanding territorial cohesion? Planning Practice and Research, 20(4), 433–441. doi: 10.1080/02697450600767926
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, P. (2006). Territorial cohesion of tomorrow: A path to co-operation or competition? European Planning Studies, 14(10), 1473–1485. doi: 10.1080/09654310600852449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, P., Böhme, K., & Zaucha, J. (2014). EU territory and policy-making: From words to deeds to promote policy integration. Debate article. European Journal of Spatial Development. Retrieved from http://archive.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/debate201401.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, F. (2010). European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. (2010). The territorial dimension of environmental sustainability. Potential territorial indicators to support the environment al dimension of territorial cohesion. EEA Technical Report 9/2010. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Elissalde, B., Santamaria, F., & Jeanne, F. (2014). Harmony and melody in discourse on European cohesion. European Planning Studies, 22(3), 627–647. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.782389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eser, T. W. (2009). From disparities to diversity – Territorial cohesion in the European Union. In H. Kilper (Ed.), German annual of spatial research and policy new disparities in spatial development in Europe (pp. 19–35). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• ESDP. (1999). European Spatial Development Perspective. Agreed at the informal council of ministers responsible for spatial planning in potsdam, May 1999. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2004). Part C: New tools and instruments for European spatial analysis. ESPON Project 3.1. “Integrated tools for European spatial development”. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2007). Feasibility study on monitoring territorial development based on ESPON key indicators, Part A: Tentative spatial monitoring report, final report. ESPON project 4.1.3. Bonn: Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2012a). KIT Knowledge, Innovation, Territory applied research 2013/1/13 final report. Luxembourg: ESPON & & Politecnico di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2012b). INTERCO indicators of territorial cohesion. Part B. Final report. Scientific Platform and Tools Project 2013/3/2. Luxembourg: ESPON & University of Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2014). ETMS – Final report.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2017). ACTAREA – Thinking and planning in areas of territorial cooperation. Final report. Luxembourg: ESPON.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2004). Territorial cohesion: Old (French) wine in new bottles? Urban Studies, 41(7), 1349–1365. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000214833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2005). Territorial cohesion: An unidentified political objective. Town Planning Review, 76(1), 1–13. doi: 10.3828/tpr.76.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2007a). The European model of society. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2007b). Territorial cohesion policy and the European model of society. European Planning Studies, 15(4), 567–583. doi: 10.1080/09654310701232079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2009). Territorial cohesion under the looking glass: Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andreas_Faludi/contributions
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2016). EU territorial cohesion, a contradiction in terms. Plannig Theory & Practice, 17(2), 302–313. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1154657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A., & Peyrony, J. (2012). Cohesion policy contributing to territorial cohesion- scenarios. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andreas_Faludi/contributions
   Google Scholar
• Farrugia, N., & Gallina, A. (2008). Developing indicators of territorial cohesion. Research report 1/2008 of Federico Caffè Centre – Department of Society and Globalization. Roskilde: Roskilde University. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/12518596.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T. B., Sykes, O., Gore, T., Marot, N., Golobič, M., Pinho, P., … Perdicoulis, A. (2015). Territorial impact assessment of European draft directives—The emergence of a new policy assessment instrument. European Planning Studies, 23(3), 433–451. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.868292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. (2011). Interfaces of European Union internal and external territorial governance: the Baltic Sea region. In N. Adams, G. Cotella, & R. Nunes (Eds.), Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning: Knowledge and policy development in an enlarged EU (pp. 382–401). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamez, G. (2005). Territorial cohesion: How to operationalise and measure the concept? Planning Theory & Practice, 6(3), 400–402. doi: 10.1080/14649350500209454
   Google Scholar
• Hanell, T. (2014). Territorial cohesion in the Baltic Sea region. Nordregio News 2014/2, 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hanell, T. (2015). Measuring territorial cohesion: A macro regional approach. In T. Lang, S. Henn, W. Sgibnev, & K. Ehrlich (Eds.), Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization. Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe and beyond (pp. 235–251). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner, D. (2011). Origin of territorial cohesion. In J. Zaucha (Ed.), Territorial cohesion – Baltic Sea region examples. Baltic contribution to the revised territorial agenda of EU, Ecoregion Perspectives, Baltic 21 Series, 2/2011 (pp. 6–7). Retrieved from http://baltic-ecoregion.eu/downloads/02_9_Persp_Freigabe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Komornicki, T., & Ciołek, D. (2017). Territorial capital in Poland. In J. Bradley, & J. Zaucha (Eds.), Territorial cohesion: A missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger (pp. 23–48). Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320700583_Territorial_Cohesion_A_missing_link_between_economic_growth_and_welfare_Lessons_from_the_Baltic_Tiger
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, G., & Dubois, A. (2014). How to monitor territorial dynamics. Nordregio News 2014/2, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• López, E., Gutiérrez, J., & Gómez, G. (2008). Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: An accessibility approach. European Planning Studies, 16(2), 277–301. doi: 10.1080/09654310701814629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., & Moilanen, H. (2012). Territoriality in the strategies and practices of the territorial cohesion policy of the European Union: Territorial challenges in implementing “soft planning”. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 481–500. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, T. S., Saraiva, M., Santinha, G., & Guerra, P. (2018). Re-thinking territorial cohesion in the European planning context. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(4), 547–572. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D., Mehlbye, P., & Schön, P. (2018). Towards a European territorial agenda post 2020: What should it consider and include? Territorial Thinkers’ Briefing 3. Luxembourg: Spatial Foresight. Retrieved from https://territorialthinkers.eu
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2011). Territorial cohesion: A conceptual analysis. Lisbon: Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning (IGOT) Alameda da Universidade. Retrieved from http://www.regionalstudies.org/uploads/funding/conferences/presentations/european-conference-2012/presentations/medeiros.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2016a). Territorial cohesion: An EU concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, 60. Retrieved from https://relocal.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2017/01/Refereed_60-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2016b). Is there a rise of the territorial dimension in EU Cohesion policy. Finisterra, 103, 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017a). The territorial dimensions of European Union policies: A conceptual approach. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), Uncovering the territorial dimension of European Union cohesion policy (pp. 9–22). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (2017b). From simple to relevant TIA tools for European policies. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), Uncovering the territorial dimension of European Union cohesion policy (pp. 147–160). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. (Ed.). (2019). Territorial cohesion the urban dimension. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., & Rauhut, D. (2018). Territorial cohesion cities: A policy recipe for achieving territorial cohesion? Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1548764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehlbye, P., & Böhme, K. (2017). More territorial cooperation post 2020? – A contribution to the debate of future EU cohesion policy (Spatial Foresight Brief No. 8). Heisdorf: Spatial Foresight.
   Google Scholar
• Mogiła, Z. (2017). Cohesion as a territorial optimum. In J. Bradley, & J. Zaucha (Eds.), Territorial cohesion: A missing link between economic growth and welfare. Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk. (pp. 73–92) Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320700583_Territorial_Cohesion_A_missing_link_between_economic_growth_and_welfare_Lessons_from_the_Baltic_Tiger
   Google Scholar
• Molle, W. (2007). European cohesion policy. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pielesiak, I. (2013). Spatial dimension of cohesion and the methods of its assessment. In T. Marszał & I. Pielesiak (Eds.), Spatial inequality and cohesion (pp. 8–21). Warsaw: Polish Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Prezioso, M. (2008). Cohesion policy: Methodology and indicators towards common approach. Romanian Journal of Regional Science, 2(2), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Rispling, L., & Grunfelder, J. (Eds.). (2016). Trends, challenges and potentials in the Baltic Sea region. Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, J. (2007). The origins of territorial cohesion and the vagaries of its trajectory. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 23–36). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Santana, P., Freitas, Â, Costa, C., & Vaz, A. (2015). Evaluating population health: The selection of main dimensions and indicators through a participatory approach. European Journal of Geography, 6(1), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Santinha, G. (2016). Policy integration: Placing the spatial dimension in the health agenda. Evidence from Portugal. Space and Polity, 20(2), 158–176. doi: 10.1080/13562576.2015.1132543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, P. (2005). Territorial cohesion in Europe? Planning Theory & Practice, 6(3), 389–400. doi: 10.1080/14649350500209397
   Google Scholar
• Schout, J. A., & Jordan, A. J. (2007). From cohesion to Territorial Policy Integration (TPI): Exploring the governance challenges in the European Union. European Planning Studies, 15(6), 835–851. doi: 10.1080/09654310701220280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2014). The rise of territorial governance in European policy. European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1368–1383. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.786684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, A. (2010). Territorial cohesion in the context of interregional and transnational cooperation. European Spatial Research and Policy, 17(1), 5–22. doi: 10.2478/v10105-010-0001-9
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, O. (2011). Investigating sub-state interpretations of European territorial cohesion: The case of the United Kingdom. International Planning Studies, 16(4), 377–396. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2011.618026
   Google Scholar
• Szlachta, J., & Zaucha, J. (2010). A new paradigm of the EU regional development in the context of the Poland’s national spatial development concepts. In P. Churski, & W. Ratajczak (Eds.), Regional development and regional policy in Poland: First experiences and new challenges of the European Union membership, Part 1 (pp. 153–171). Warsaw: Polish Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• TA. (2007). Territorial agenda of the European Union – Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions – Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion on 24/25th May 2007, Leipzig, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• TA. (2011). Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020 – Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions – Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May, Hungary: Gödöllő.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, B. I. (2015). Territorial capital: Theory, empirics and critical remarks. European Planning Studies, 23(7), 1327–1344. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2014.928675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VASAB. (1994). Towards a framework for spatial development in the Baltic Sea region. Denmark: Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea.
   Google Scholar
• VASAB. (2001). VASAB 2010 plus spatial development action programme. Gdańsk: Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea.
   Google Scholar
• VASAB. (2005). Gdańsk declaration and policy document connecting potentials, vision and strategies around the Baltic Sea 2010. 6th Conference of Minister for Spatial Planning and Development. Gdańsk: Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea.
   Google Scholar
• VASAB. (2009). VASAB long-term perspective for the territorial development of the Baltic Sea region. Towards better territorial integration of the Baltic Sea region and its integration with other areas of Europe. Riga: Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea.
   Google Scholar
• Vogelij, J. (2010). Fifteen steps towards territorial cohesion. Brussels: ECTP-CEU.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. (2007). Territorial cohesion: The underlying discourse. In A. Faludi (Ed.), Territorial cohesion and the European model of society (pp. 37–59). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Brodzicki, T., Ciołek, D., Komornicki, T., Mogiła, Z., Szlachta, J., & Zaleski, J. (2015). Terytorialny wymiar wzrostu i rozwoju. Spójność, potencjały i użyteczność. Warszawa: Difin.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2014). Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial agenda of the EU and Europe 2020. European Planning Studies, 22(2), 246–267. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Świątek, D., & Stańczuk-Olejnik, K. (2013). Place-based territorially sensitive and integrated approach. Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development.
   Google Scholar