Different typologies of ‘co-working spaces’ and the contemporary dynamics of local economic development in Rome

References

• Andersson, M., & Larsson, J. P. (2016). Local entrepreneurship clusters in cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(1), 39–66. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbu049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2008). Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy; a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. EERI research paper Series, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Maskell, P., & Malmberg, A. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Turi, P. (2011). Local, global and virtual buzz: The importance of face-to-face contact in economic interaction and possibilities to go beyond. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 42(5), 520–529. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2017). Curating the ‘third place’? Coworking and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 82(April), 112–126. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. (2014). Coworker, makers, and fabbers. Global, local and internal dynamics of innovation in localized communities in Barcelona. Montreal: HEC Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localized dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 1540004. doi: 10.1142/S1363919615400046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Hertog, P. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491–528. doi: 10.1142/S136391960000024X
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations, 7(3), 11–14. doi: 10.1162/INOV_a_00135
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). The Entrepreneurship Action Plan 2020. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/promoting-entrepreneurship/action-plan_en
   Google Scholar
• Ferm, J. (2014). Delivering affordable workspace: Perspectives of developers and workspace providers in London. Progress in Planning, 93, 1–49. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2013.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertner, D., & Mack, E. (2017). The entrepreneurial orientation (EO) of incubators, accelerators, and Co-working Spaces. International Journal of Regional Development, 4(2), 1–35. doi: 10.5296/ijrd.v4i2.10210
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insolera, I. (2001). Roma moderna. Un secolo di storia urbanistica. 1870-1970. Roma: Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Kalil, T., & Rodriguez, R. (2015). Building a Nation of Makers. Obama White House Archives. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/05/04/building-nation-makers
   Google Scholar
• Kojo, I., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? Facilities, 34(5/6), 302–313. doi: 10.1108/F-08-2014-0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 15(1), 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• MiBACT. (2017). Franceschini, nelle periferie si giocano le sfide del nostro tempo. Al Cerimant di Tor Sapienza grande investimento per sostenere e promuovere la creatività contemporanea. Retrieved from http://www.beniculturali.it/mibac/export/MiBAC/sito-MiBAC/Contenuti/MibacUnif/Comunicati/visualizza_asset.html_1465208079.html (accessed 15 May 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Moriset, B. (2014). Building new places of the creative economy: The rise of coworking spaces. In: 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014 Utrecht University, Utrecht, 23-25 January 2014 (2014), 2014, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento, S., & Pólvora, A. (2016). Maker cultures and the prospects for technological action. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, M., & Vandore, E. (2014). Here be startups: Exploring London’s ‘tech city’ digital cluster. Environment and Planning A, 46(10), 2283–2299. doi: 10.1068/a130255p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pais, I. (2013). Il coworking può rinnovare le politiche del lavoro. Vita e Pensiero, 4, 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 13(3), 261–271. doi: 10.1057/kmrp.2013.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2017). Interplaces. An economic geography of the inter-urban and international economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Silva, C. (2018). Mind the gaps! A research agenda for urban interstices. Urban Studies, 55(6), 1203–1222. doi: 10.1177/0042098017732714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, U., & Di Bella, A. (2017). Start-up urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the global urbanization of technology-based economies. Environment and Planning A, 49(5), 999–1018. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17690153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., & Brinks, V. (2017). Open creative labs: Spatial settings at the intersection of communities and organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(3), 291–299. doi: 10.1111/caim.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., Brinks, V., & Brinkhoff, S. (2015). Innovation and creativity labs in Berlin: Organizing temporary spatial configurations for innovations. Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie, 58(4), 232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., Müller, F. C., Ibert, O., & Brinks, V. (2017). Open region: Creating and exploiting opportunities for innovation at the regional scale. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(2), 187–205. doi: 10.1177/0969776417705942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Comparative case study of three Makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. doi: 10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone, together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441. doi: 10.1177/1050651912444070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J. (2016). The post-industrial ‘shop floor’: Emerging forms of gentrification in San Francisco’s innovation economy. Antipode, 48(2), 474–493. doi: 10.1111/anti.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, 10 years Later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2(3), 191–221. doi: 10.1177/096977649500200301
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 147–167. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbn052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370. doi: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toombs, A., & Bardzell, S. (2014). Becoming makers: Hackerspace member habits, values, and identities. Journal of Peer Production, 5, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• van Holm, E. J. (2015). Makerspaces and contributions to entrepreneurship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.167
   Google Scholar
• Van Holm, E. J. (2017). Makerspaces and local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(2), 164–173. doi: 10.1177/0891242417690604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, L. (2012). Le borgate del fascismo. Storia Urbana, politica e sociale della periferia romana. Milano: Ledizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B., & Loo, B. P. Y. (2017). Hubs of Internet entrepreneurs: The emergence of co-working offices in Shanghai, China. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(3), 67–84. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1285124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Powers, L., Doussard, M., Schrock, G., Heying, C., Eisenburger, M., & Marotta, S. (2017). The maker movement and urban economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(4), 365–376. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2017.1360787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar