Networks of cross-border cooperation in Europe – the interests and values. The case of Spree–Neisse–Bober Euroregion

References

• Anderson, S., & Francois, P. (2008). Formalizing informal institutions: Theory and evidence from a Kenyan Slum. In E. Helpman (Ed.), Institutions and economic Performance (pp. 409–451). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batorski, D. (2008). Metody analizy sieci i ich zastosowanie w ewaluacji [Methods of network analysis and their application in evaluation.]. In A. Haber, & M. Szałaj (Eds.), Środowisko i warsztat ewaluacji [Environment and evaluation workshop] (pp. 167–192). Warsaw: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R. (2001). Dokumentująca orientacja wzorów orientacji działania [Documenting the orientation of the operational orientation patterns]. In D. Urbaniak-Zając, & J. Piekarski (Eds.), Jakościowe orientacje w badaniach społecznych [Qualitative Orientations in social research] (pp. 183–201). Łódź: Uniwersytet Łódzki.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22, 1168–1181. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrabąszcz, R. (2015). Governance vs multi-level governance. In S. Mazur (Ed.), Public governance (pp. 258–274). Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2002). Spatial concepts and cross-border governance strategies: Comparing north American and northern Europe experiences. Paper presented at the EURA conference on Urban and Spatial European policies, Turin, 2. Advance online publication. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Susan_Clarke10/publication/268201057_Spatial_concepts_and_cross_border_governance_strategies_Comparing_North_American_and_Northern_Europe_experiences/links/55628e0008ae6f4dcc952fd9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1982). Człowiek i system. Ograniczenia działania zespołowego [Man and system. Limitations of team activities]. Warsaw: PWE Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeMarco, T., & Lister, T. (2013). Peopleware: Productive projects and teams (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Dołzbłasz, S., & Raczyk, A. (2010). Współpraca transgraniczna w Polsce po akcesji do UE [Cross-border cooperation in Poland after accession to the EU]. Krakow: Wolters Kluwer Business Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Nelles, J. (2012). Cross-border governance within the Eurometropolis Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai (ELKT) through the example of cross-border public transportation. CEPS/INSTEAD, Working Papers Vol. 16. Retrieved from https://www.liser.lu/?type=module&id=104&tmp=2652
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., & Nelles, J. (2014). Binding cross-border regions: An analysis of cross-border governance in Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai Eurometropolis. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105(5), Retrieved from www.researchgate.net/publication/259556479_Binding_Cross-Border_Regions_An_Analysis_of_Cross-Border_Governance_in_Lille-Kortrijk-Tournai_Eurometropolis. Accessed January 7, 2019. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. (2010). Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12), 5334–5338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913149107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frątczak-Müller, J., & Mielczarek-Żejmo, A. (2014). Partnerstwa transgraniczne – udział instytucji w inicjowaniu sieci społecznych (na przykładzie Euroregionu Sprewa-Nysa-Bóbr) [Cross-border partnerships – participation of institutions in initiating social networks (on the example of the Spree–Neisse–Bober Euroregion)]. Opuscula Socilogica, 3(9), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Frątczak-Müller, J., & Mielczarek-Żejmo, A. (2016a). Cross-border partnerships – the impact of institutions on creating the borderland communities (the case of Spree–Neisse–Bober Euroregion). Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(1), 77–97. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2015.1098523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frątczak-Müller, J., & Mielczarek-Żejmo, A. (2016b). Zwischen Sympathie und Gleichgültigkeit. Die Einstellung der Einwohner der Euroregion Spree-Neisse-Bober zu ihren Nachbarn [Between sympathy and indifference. The attitude of the inhabitants of Euroregion Spree–Neisse–Bober towards their neighbours]. In U. Bretschneider, F. Sönke, & I. Spieker (Eds.), Verordnete Nachtbarschaften: Transformationsprozesse im deutsch-polnisch-tchechischen Grenzraum seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg [Decreed Neighbourhoods: Transformation processes in the German–Polish–Czech border area since the second World War] (pp. 165–179). Dresden: Thelem.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, WA: Empirical Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gołdyka, L. (1999). Miasto pogranicza polsko-niemieckiego jako środowisko wychowawcze [A city of the Polish–German borderland as an educational environment]. In L. Gołdyka, J. Leszkowicz-Baczyński, L. Szczegóła, & M. Zielińska (Eds.), Transgraniczność w perspektywie socjologicznej [Cross-border in the sociological perspective] (pp. 153–163). Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe.
   Google Scholar
• Gołdyka, L. (2013). Pogranicze polsko-niemieckie jako przestrzeń socjalizacji [The Polish–German borderland as a space for socialization]. Warsaw: Scholar Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greta, M., & Lewandowski, K. (2008). The significance of Euroregions in the process of achieving social and economic cohesion in the European Union. In R. Stanisławski, M. Greta, & A. Maciaszczyk (Eds.), Structural funds for the socio-economic development of the Lodz region in the perspective of experiences of Polish regions (pp. 213–225). Łódź: Politechnika Łódzka Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2011). Concepts and measures for basic social network analysis. In J. Scott, & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social network analysis (pp. 340–369). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hubermann, A. M., & Miles, M. (1994). Data management and analysis method. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). London: New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Klatt, M. (2012). Mobile regions: Competitive regional concepts (not only) in the Danish–German border region. In D. Jagetić Andersen, M. Klatt, & M. Sandeberg (Eds.), The border multiple: The practicing of borders between public policy and everyday life in a re-scaling Europe (pp. 55–73). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Skelcher, C. K. (2007). Democracy and governance networks: Compatible or not? Four conjectures and their implications. Public Administration, 85(3), 587–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00662.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurcz, Z. (1999). Pogranicze polsko-niemieckie a “polnische Wirtschaft” [Polish–German borderland and “Polnische Wirtschaft”]. In L. Gołdyka (Ed.), Transgraniczność w perspektywie socjologicznej. Kontynuacje [Cross-border in the sociological perspective. Continuations] (pp. 219–233). Zielona Góra: Lubuskie Towarzystwo Naukowe.
   Google Scholar
• Kurczewska, U. (2014). Partycypacja obywatelska w zarządzaniu politykami publicznymi Unii Europejskiej [Citizen participation in managing public policies of the European Union]. In A. Przybylska, & A. Giza (Eds.), Partycypacja obywatelska. Od teorii do praktyki społecznej [Civic participation. From theory to social practice] (pp. 100–120). Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, M. (2013). Konkurs jako instytucja fasadowa [Competition as a façade institution]. Studia Socjologiczne, 1(208), 95–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lechevalier, A., & Wielgohs, J. (Eds.). (2013). Borders and border regions in Europe. Changes, challenges, and chance. Bielefeld: Transcript. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://www.transcript-verlag.de/ts2442/ts2442_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1968). On the concept of value-commitments. Sociological Inquiry, 38(2), 135–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1968.tb00679.x
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2002). Policy entrepreneurs, multilevel governance and policy networks in the European policy: The case of the EUREGIO. Published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Perkmann-Policy-Entrepreneurs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. (2007). Construction of new territorial scales: A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region. Regional Studies, 41(2), 253–266. doi: 10.1080/00343400600990517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multi-level governance: Conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132–1205. doi: 10.1086/421508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. (1963). From a logical point of view. Logico-philosophical essays. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Radek, R. (2011). Znaczenie współpracy transgranicznej w rozwoju społeczności lokalnych i regionalnych polskiego pogranicza [The importance of cross-border cooperation in the development of local and regional communities of the Polish border]. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobczyński, M. (2005). Percepcja współpracy transgranicznej Polski z sąsiadami pośród mieszkańców pograniczy [Perception of Poland’s C-border cooperation with its neighbors among borderland residents]. In M. Malikowski, & D. Wojakowski (Eds.), Granice i pogranicza nowej Unii Europejskiej. Z badań regionalnych, etnicznych i lokalnych [Borders and borderlines of the new European Union. From the regional, ethnic and local research] (pp. 55–76). Kraków: Nomos Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 27(2), 197–237. doi: 10.1080/10841806.2005.11029489
   Google Scholar
• Stokłosa, K., & Besier, G. (Eds.). (2014). European border regions in comparison. Overcoming nationalistic aspects or re-nationalization? Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strihan, A. (2008). A network-based approach to regional borders: The case of Belgium. Regional Studies, 42(4), 539–554. doi: 10.1080/00343400701541813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmigiel-Rawska, K., & Dołzbłasz, S. (2012). Trwałość współpracy przygranicznej [Durability of cross-border cooperation]. Warsaw: CeDeWu Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (2002). Socjologia [Sociology]. Warsaw: Znak.
   Google Scholar
• Ziółkowski, M. (2000). Przemiany interesów i wartości społeczeństwa polskiego [Transformations of interests and values of Polish society]. Poznań: Fundacja Humaniora Publishing House.
   Google Scholar