Green industry development in different types of regions

References

• Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., & McHale, J. (2006). Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 571–591. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Regional innovation systems: Past–present–future. In R. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, & D. Doloreux (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of innovation (pp. 45–62). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2017a). Introduction: Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics. Economic Geography, 93, 429–435. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., Trippl, M. (2017b). Smart specialization as an innovation-driven strategy for economic diversification: Examples from Scandinavian regions. In S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, & R. Gheorghiu, et al. (Eds.), Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization (pp. 74–99). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 77–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1013100704794
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 291–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6, 131–140. doi: 10.1080/09654319808720451
   Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Gosens, J., Hansen, T., & Hansen, U. E. (2017). Toward technology-sensitive catching-up policies: Insights from renewable energy in China. World Development, 96, 418–437. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2016). Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography, 92, 172–200. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S. (2011). Policy learning and organizational capacities in innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 38, 725–734. doi: 10.3152/030234211X13070021633323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273–302. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buen, J. (2006). Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion. Energy Policy, 34, 3887–3897. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., & Keenan, M. (2012). Orienting European innovation systems towards grand challenges and the roles that FTA can play. Science and Public Policy, 39, 140–152. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capasso, M., Hansen, T., Heiberg, J., Klitkou, A., & Steen, M. (2019). Green growth – A synthesis of scientific findings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 390–402. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., Mingardo, G., & Van Haaren, J. (2012). Green urban transport policies and cleantech innovations: Evidence from Curitiba, Göteborg and Hamburg. European Planning Studies, 20, 375–396. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chlebna, C., & Simmie, J. (2018). New technological path creation and the role of institutions in different geo-political spaces. European Planning Studies, 26, 969–987. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1441380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Hansen, T., & Rekers, J. V. (2015). Innovation policy for grand challenges. An economic geography perspective. Geography Compass, 9, 483–496. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., & Martin, H. (2015). Path renewal in old industrial regions: Possibilities and limitations for regional innovation policy. Regional Studies, 49, 850–865. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.979321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365–382. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction. Origins of the concept. In H.-J. Braczyk, P. Cooke, & M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governances in a globalized world (pp. 2–25). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2004). Integrating global knowledge flows for generative growth in Scotland: Life sciences as a knowledge economy exemplar. In J. Potter (Ed.), Global knowledge flows and economic development (pp. 73–96). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2010). Regional innovation systems: Development opportunities from the ‘green turn’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22, 831–844. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2010.511156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. (2014). Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 90, 91–112. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essletzbichler, J. (2012). Renewable energy technology and path creation: A multi-scalar approach to energy transition in the UK. European Planning Studies, 20, 791–816. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. A. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7, 635–649. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32, 277–300. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47, 760–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (1995). “Being there”: Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies. Economic Geography, 71, 1–26. doi: 10.2307/144433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., & O’Neill, K. (2014). The green economy, sustainability transitions and transition regions: A case study of Boston. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96, 201–216. doi: 10.1111/geob.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Eguino, M., Galarraga, I., & Ansuategi, A. (2011). The future of old industrial regions in a carbon-constrained world. Climate Policy, 12, 164–186. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2011.605707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties; the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M. (2015). Institutional layers, connectedness and change: Implications for economic evolution in regions. European Planning Studies, 23, 2099–2124. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.1003796
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Asheim, B. (2018). Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 26, 1638–1662. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1484892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11, 257–274. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miörner, J., & Moodysson, J. (2019). Innovation policy for system wide transformation: The case of strategic innovation programs (SIPs) in Sweden. Research Policy, 48, 1048–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science, 54, 299–321. doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Trippl, M. (2016). Innovation policies and new regional growth paths: A place-based system failure framework. Papers in Innovation Studies No. 2016/26.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. (2014). Juggling with proximity and distance: Collaborative innovation projects in the Danish cleantech industry. Economic Geography, 90, 375–402. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. (2015). Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies, 49, 1672–1684. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.873120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2017). Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: The role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29, 500–513. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2016.1249838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., Klitkou, A., Borup, M., Scordato, L., & Wessberg, N. (2017). Path creation in Nordic energy and road transport systems – the role of technological characteristics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 551–562. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Mattes, J. (2018). Proximity and power in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies, 52, 35–46. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1263387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R. (2010). Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 450–468). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J. (2010). Breaking out from lock-in: Regional innovation strategies in the German ruhrgebiet. In P. Ordóñez de Pablos, W. B. Lee, & J. Zhao (Eds.), Regional innovation systems and sustainable development: Emerging technologies (pp. 43–56). Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Huenteler, J., Schmidt, T. S., Ossenbrink, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2016). Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 102–121. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbert, E., Ladu, L., Morone, P., & Quitzow, R. (2017). Comparing policy strategies for a transition to a bio economy in Europe: The case of Italy and Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovation systems: Is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy? Canadian Jounal of Regional Science, 14, 101–120. doi: 10.1.1.556.7412
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Karlsen, J. (2013). Can small regions construct regional advantages? The case of four Norwegian regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20, 243–257. doi: 10.1177/0969776412439200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2014). Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. Papers in Innovation Studies. CIRCLE Working Paper Series, Nr. 2014/17, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2017). Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography, 93, 436–457. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. In Project TBEE (Ed.). Babson Park, MA: Babson College, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016). Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45, 205–217. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25, 609–619. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499. doi: 10.1086/261763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laranja, M., Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2008). Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy, 37, 823–835. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, T., Merisalo, M., & Inkinen, T. (2018). Containers, facilitators, innovators? The role of cities and city employees in innovation activities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25, 106–118. doi: 10.1177/0969776417691565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, N. I. (2004). Renewable energy policy in Denmark. Energy for Sustainable Development, 8, 25–35. doi: 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60388-9
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2016). Nurturing novelty: Regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 35, 569–583. doi: 10.1177/0263774X16645106
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., & Smith, A. (2013). Understanding transition - periphery dynamics: Renewable energy in the highlands and Islands of Scotland. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45, 691–709. doi: 10.1068/a45190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2000). Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4, 69–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1009941416749
   Google Scholar
• Normann, H. E. (2015). The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 15, 180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyborg, S., & Røpke, I. (2013). Constructing users in the smart grid—insights from the Danish eFlex project. Energy Efficiency, 6, 655–670. doi: 10.1007/s12053-013-9210-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32, 319–332. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45, 1620–1635. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47, 1554–1567. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2019). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   Google Scholar
• Simmie, J. (2012). Path dependence and new technological path creation in the Danish wind power industry. European Planning Studies, 20, 753–772. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.667924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmie, J., Sternberg, R., & Carpenter, J. (2014). New technological path creation: Evidence from the British and German wind energy industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24, 875–904. doi: 10.1007/s00191-014-0354-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. (2015). Leadership and the city: Power, strategy and networks in the making of knowledge cities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2010). ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy, 39, 449–458. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Local demonstrations for global transitions—dynamics across governance levels fostering socio-technical regime change towards sustainability. European Planning Studies, 20, 461–479. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24, 1605–1622. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2014). Same sea, different ponds: Cross-sectorial knowledge spillovers in the north sea. European Planning Studies, 22, 2030–2049. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.814622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (1995). The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: The region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2, 191–221. doi: 10.1177/096977649500200301
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M., Kemeny, T., Makarem, N., & Osman, T. (2015). The rise and fall of urban economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strambach, S. (2017). Combining knowledge bases in transnational sustainability innovation: Microdynamics and institutional change. Economic Geography, 93, 500–526. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2017.1366268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90, 403–427. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34, 1203–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26, 1779–1795. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., & Isaksen, A. (2018). Exogenous sources of regional industrial change. Progress in Human Geography, 42, 687–705. doi: 10.1177/0309132517700982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., & Isaksen, A. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. D. Parrilli, R. D. Fitjar, & A. Rodriguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 82–100). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. Nairobi: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar