Hard work with soft spaces (and vice versa): problematizing the transforming planning spaces

References

• Allen, J., Cochrane, J., & Massey, D. (1998). Rethinking the region. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T., & Sielker, F. (2014). Europeanizing territoriality – Towards soft spaces. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2703–2718. doi: 10.1068/a130037p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A, 41, 617–633. doi: 10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010). Spatial planning, devolution and new planning spaces. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 803–818. doi: 10.1068/c09163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., Haughton, G., Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Soft spaces in Europe. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Axford, B. (2006). The dialectic of borders and networks in Europe: Reviewing ‘topological presuppositions’. Comparative European Politics, 4, 160–182. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110079
   Google Scholar
• Bothnian Arc Brochure. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.bothnianarc.net/-en/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/BA-esite-broschyr-201705-Eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bothnianarc.net. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.bothnianarc.net/en/peramerenkaari
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. (2018). Relational thinking and the region. In A. Paasi, J. Harrison, & M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of regions and territories (pp. 79–88). Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Strange, I. (2009). Conceptions of space and place in strategic spatial planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deas, I., Haughton, G., & Hincks, S. (2015). ‘A good geography is whatever it needs to be’: The Atlantic Gateway and evolving spatial imaginaries in North West England. In P. Allmendinger, G. Haughton, J. Knieling, & F. Othegrafen (Eds.), Soft spaces in Europe. Re-negotiating governance, boundaries and borders (pp. 25–44). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, K. (2010). Flag planting and finger pointing: The law of the sea, the Arctic and the political geographies of the outer continental shelf. Political Geography, 29(2), 63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44, 343–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frisvoll, S., & Rye, J. K. (2009). Elite discourses of regional identity in a new regionalism development scheme: The case of the ‘mountain region’ in Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidskrift, 63, 175–190. doi: 10.1080/00291950903238990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Allmendinger, P. (2015). Fluid spatial imaginaries: Evolving estuarial city-regional spaces. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., & Oosterlynck, S. (2013). Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: Soft spaces, post-politics and neoliberal governmentality. Environment and Planning A, 45, 217–234. doi: 10.1068/a45121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), 45–67. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., & Underwood, J. (1978). Professional ideals and planning practice. Progress in Planning, 9, 73–127. doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(78)90005-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heley, J. (2013). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries and spatial governance in post-devolution Wales. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37, 1325–1348. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01149.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hincks, S., Deas, I., & Haughton, G. (2017). Real geographies, real economies and soft spatial imaginaries: Creating a ‘more than Manchester’ region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(4), 642–657. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing socio-spatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & MacLeod, G. (2004). Regional spaces, spaces of regionalism: Territory, insurgent politics and the English question. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29, 433–452. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Paasi, A. (2013). Regional world(s): Advancing the geography of regions. Regional Studies, 47(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.746437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., & Moilanen, H. (2012). Territoriality in the strategies and practices of the territorial cohesion policy of the European Union: Territorial challenges in implementing ‘soft planning’. European Planning Studies, 20(3), 481–500. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson, M., & Pettersson, Ö. (2005). Cross-border collaboration in the north. Viewpoints of municipal representatives and firm managers on the Bothnian Arc project. Fennia, 183(2), 97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. (2013). Raising the regional Leviathan: A relational-materialist conceptualization of regions-in-becoming as publics-in-stabilization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4), 1368–1395. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., & Schmitt, P. (2012). When soft spaces harden: The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea region. Environment and Planning A, 44(2), 263–280. doi: 10.1068/a44188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., & Paasi, A. (2013). From geopolitical to geoeconomic? The changing political rationalities of state space. Geopolitics, 18(2), 267–283. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2012.723287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2007). The polycentric state: New spaces of empowerment and engagement? Regional Studies, 41, 1237–1251. doi: 10.1080/00343400701543363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2012). Soft spaces as vehicles for neoliberal transformations of strategic spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 30(5), 910–923. doi: 10.1068/c11241
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, K., & Richardson, T. (2011). The spatial politics of spatial representation: Relationality as a medium for depoliticization? International Planning Studies, 16, 355–375. doi: 10.1080/13563475.2011.615549
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (1991). Deconstructing regions: Notes on the scales of human life. Environment and Planning A, 23, 239–256. doi: 10.1068/a230239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A (2013). Regional planning and the mobilization of ‘regional identity’: from bounded spaces to relational complexity. Regional Studies, 47(8), 1206–1219. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2012.661410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., & Metzger, J. (2017). Foregrounding the region. Regional Studies, 51(1), 19–30. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1239818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., & Prokkola, E.-K. (2008). Territorial dynamics, cross-border work and everyday life in the Finnish-Swedish border. Space and Polity, 12(1), 13–29. doi: 10.1080/13562570801969366
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., & Zimmerbauer, K. (2016). Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning. Environment and Planning A, 48(1), 75–93. doi: 10.1177/0308518X15594805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, J. (2010). Rethinking territory. Antipode, 42(5), 1090–1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00795.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F., & Frisk, H. (2016). Soft space regional planning as an approach for integrated transport and land use planning in Sweden – challenges and ways forward. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 4(1), 64–82. doi: 10.1080/21650020.2016.1156020
   Google Scholar
• Pohjois-Pohjanmaan liitto. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.pohjois-pohjanmaa.fi/regional_development_and_planning
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. (2018). Diminishing borders and conflating spaces: A storyline to promote soft planning scales. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 1008–1027. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1430750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2000). Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. European Integration Online Papers, 4(8). Retrieved from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2000-008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schack, M. (2000). On the Multicontextual character of border regions. In M. van der Velde & H. van Houtum (Eds.), Borders, regions and people (pp. 202–219). London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Shabir, M., & Naz, M. (2011). On soft topological spaces. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 61(7), 1786–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2012). Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27, 103–116. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2011.644084
   Google Scholar
• Terlouw, K. (2009). Rescaling regional identities: Communicating thick and thin regional identities. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 9(3), 452–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9469.2009.01064.x
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Littlewood, S. (2010). From green belts to green infrastructure? The evolution of a new concept in the emerging soft governance of spatial strategies. Planning Practice & Research, 25(2), 203–222. doi: 10.1080/02697451003740213
   Google Scholar
• Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space. Theories of urban design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C., Jacuniak-Suda, M., Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015). Soft spaces in spatial planning and governance: theoretical reflections and definitional ideas. Conference paper. Retrieved from https://3ftfah3bhjub3knerv1hneul-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/walsh-et-al.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K. (2013). Unusual regionalism in northern Europe. Barents region in the making. Regional Studies, 47(1), 89–103. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.644236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar