Spatial governance and planning systems in the public control of spatial development: a European typology

References

• Affolderbach, J., & Carr, C. (2016). Blending scales of governance: Land-use policies and practices in the small state of Luxembourg. Regional Studies, 50(6), 944–955. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.893057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. (2008). The emerging Danish government reform – centralised decentralisation. Urban Research and Practice, 1(1), 3–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060701795298
   Google Scholar
• Benedek, J. (2013). The spatial planning system in Romania. Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 9(2), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, E. (2018). The evolution of spatial planning systems in the Western Balkan Region. Between international influences and domestic actors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Politecnico di Torino, Turin, IT.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, E., Colic, N., Cotella, G., & Nedovic Budic, Z. (2018). Mind the gap: Spatial planning systems in the Western Balkan Region. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 2, 47–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2018.01.004
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J., & McGreal, S. (Eds.). (1995). European cities, planning systems and property markets. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Boussauw, K. (2012). Challenges, threats and opportunities in post-conflict urban development in Kosovo. Habitat International, 36(1), 143–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brade, I., Herfert, G., & Wiest, K. (2009). Lull before the storm? Recent trends and future prospects of sociospatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe. Cities, 26(5), 233–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., & Bregman, A. (2016). Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis: Trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise. European Planning Studies, 24(7), 1281–1294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., Galle, M., & Sorel, N. (2011). Plan-led planning systems in development-led practices: An empirical analysis into the (lack of) institutionalisation of planning law. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(4), 928–941. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a43400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caesar, C. (2016). Municipal land allocations: Integrating planning and selection of developers while transferring public land for housing in Sweden. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 257–275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9457-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (1997). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Regional Development Studies, 28. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2000). The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies, France. Regional Development Studies, 28E. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G. (2007). Central Eastern Europe in the global market scenario: Evolution of the system of governance in Poland from socialism to capitalism. Journal fur Entwicklungspolitik, 23(1), 98–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-23-1-98
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G. (2014). Spatial planning in Poland between European influences and dominant market forces. In M. Reimer, P. Getimis, & H. Blotevogel (Eds.) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective on continuity and changes (pp. 255-277). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2002). Town and country planning in the UK (13th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H., Edwards, D., Hooper, A., & Punter, J. (1989). Comparative study. In H. Davies (Ed.), Planning control in Western Europe (pp. 409–442). London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Djurasovic, A. (2016). Ideology, political transition and the city: The case of Mostar, Bosnia & Herzegovina. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2007). Governance of territorial and urban policies from EU to local level. ESPON Project 2.3.2, Final report. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018a). COMPASS – comparative analysis of territorial governance and spatial planning systems in Europe. Final Report. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018b). COMPASS – comparative analysis of territorial governance and spatial planning systems in Europe. Final Report – Additional Volume 2 Methodology. Luxembourg: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1987). A decision-centred view of environmental planning. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1988). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauci, P. (2002). Structure planning in the Maltese Islands: An assessment of contemporary endeavours in the establishment of a policy-led planning system in Malta ( Vol. I & II). Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle, School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, J.-D. (2016). The managerial turn and municipal land-use planning in Switzerland – evidence from practice. Planning Theory and Practice, 17(2), 192–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1161063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2002). Urban and regional planning (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, M., Carman, C., Castle, M., Conradt, D., Nanetti, R., Leonardi, R., … White, S. (2014). Politics in Europe (6th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanocq, P. (2011). The territorial planning system and the urban development in Belgium: From a deterministic to a strategic model. Final report, COST Action TU 0602 Land Management for Urban Dynamics. Strasbourg, FR: Publications Office of the European Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Humer, A. (2018). An Austrian perspective on negotiated land use plans: A means for municipalities to mobilise building land. In J. Gerber, T. Hartmann, & A. Hengstermann (Eds.) Instruments of land policy (pp. 114–117). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ilmavirta, T. (2018). Livability in new urban Helsinki. In R. Caves & F. Wagner (Eds.), Livable cities from a global perspective (pp. 15–28). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2008). Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice and Research, 23(2), 167–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 63–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2017). Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: A European comparison. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 994–1012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadimitriou, N., & Pagonis, T. (2019). Planning reform and development rights in Greece: Institutional persistence and elite rule in the face of the crisis. European Planning Studies, 27(6), 1217–1234.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., O’Callaghan, C., Boyle, M., Gleeson, G., & Keaveney, K. (2012). Placing neoliberalism: The rise and fall of Ireland’s Celtic Tiger. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(6), 1302–1326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a44349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., Janin Rivolin, U., Seixas, J., & Vladova, G., (2016). Crisis and urban change. Reflections, strategies, and approaches. In J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds.) Cities in crisis. Socio-spatial impacts of the economic crisis in Southern European cities (pp. 48–70). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (Eds.), (2009). Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kovachev, A., Slaev, A., Zeković, S., Maričić, T., & Daskalova, L. (2017). The changing role of planning and the market in the process of urban growth in English and Sofie. Spatium, 37(1), 34–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1737034K
   Google Scholar
• Kule, L., & Røsnes, A. (2011). Balancing developers’ interests in planning control: Tendencies in the revision of planning legislation in Latvia and Norway. In E. Hepperle, R. Dixon-Gough, T. Kalbro, R. Mansberger, & K. Meyer-Cech (Eds.), Core-theme of land use politics: Sustainability and balance of interests (pp. 161–187). Zurich, CH: Vdf Hichschulverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Liepa-Zemeša, M., & Hess, D. (2016). Effects of public perception on urban planning: Evolution of an inclusive planning system during crises in Latvia. Town Planning Review, 87(1), 71–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2016.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovering, J., & Turkmen, H. (2011). Bulldozer neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The state-led construction of property markets, and the displacement of the urban poor. International Planning Studies, 16(1), 73–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.552477
   Google Scholar
• Mantiñán, M. (2010). Expansion and crisis in the neoliberal town planning process in Spain. Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche di Geografia, 12(1), 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Mazza, L. (2015). Planning and citizenship. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mirò, V. (2011). Producing a “successful city”: Neoliberal urbanism and gentrification in the tourist city – the case of Palma (Majorca). Urban Studies Research, 2011, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/989676
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2010). Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, 18(7), 1097–1131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008). European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP - The Planning Review, 44(172), 35–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2013). Opening up the compendium: An evaluation of international comparative planning research methodologies. European Planning Studies, 21(10), 1542–1561. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D., (2014). Spatial planning in the United Kingdom, 1990–2013. In M. Reimer, P. Getimis, & H. Blotevogel (Eds.) Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective on continuity and changes (pp. 183–207). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996). Urban planning in Europe. International competition, national systems and planning projects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Notermans, T. (2015). An unassailable fortress? Neo-liberalism in Estonia. Localities, 5(1), 103–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.15299/local.2015.11.5.103
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). The governance of land use in the Czech Republic. The case of Prague. Paris, FR: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, M. (2017). Spatial planning in transition in Greece: A critical overview. European Planning Studies, 25(10), 1818–1833. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1344194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D. (2016). Introduction: Crisis and renewal of contemporary urban planning. European Planning Studies, 24(7), 1237–1245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1168782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potsiou, C., Theodorou, M., & Elikkos, E. (2009). Informal development due to market pressure – A case study on Cyprus and the role of land administration [special series]. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 4(1), 28–52.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., Getimis, P., & Blotevogel, H. (Eds.) (2014). Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: A comparative perspective on continuity and changes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruoppila, S. (2007). Establishing a market-orientated urban planning system after state socialism: The case of Tallinn. European Planning Studies, 15(3), 405–427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310601017117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (Ed.). (2005). Comparative planning cultures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slaev, A., & Nikiforov, I. (2013). Factors of urban sprawl in Bulgaria. Spatium, 29(1), 22–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1329022S
   Google Scholar
• Solly, A. (2018). Spatial planning and well-being: A survey on the Swiss case (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Politecnico di Torino, Turin, IT.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanovska, J., & Kozelje, J. (2012). Urban planning and transitional development issues: The case of Skopje, Macedonia. Urbani izziv, 23(1), 91–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-01-002
   Google Scholar
• Tansel, B. (2019). Reproducing authoritarian neoliberalism in Turkey: Urban governance and state restructuring in the shadow of executive centralization. Globalizations, 16(3), 320–335. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1502494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. (1999). Discretion, flexibility and certainty in British planning: Emerging ideological conflicts and inherent political tensions. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(3), 244–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9901800306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtonen, E., Falkenbach, H., & Viitanen, K. (2017). Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: Empirical evidence from Finland. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 1053–1075. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1301885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, P., & Verachtert, K. (2016). Whose permits? The tenacity of permissive development control in Flanders. European Planning Studies, 24(2), 387–406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1045838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettoretto, L. (2009). Planning cultures in Italy – reformism, laissez-faire and contemporary trends. In J. Knieling & F. Othengrafen (Eds.) Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning (pp. 189–204). Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F., & Sykes, O. (2013). Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An exploration. Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), 141–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.699261
   Google Scholar
• Zakhour, S., & Metzger, J. (2018). From a “planning-led regime” to a “development-led regime” (and back again?): The role of municipal planning in the urban governance of Stockholm. disP - The Planning Review, 54(4), 46–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1562797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar