A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy

References

• Blečić, I., Cecchini, A., Congiu, T., Fancello, G., & Trunfio, G. (2015). Evaluating walkability: A capability-wise planning and design support system. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(8), 1350–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1026824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, T., Jain, J., & Chatterjee, K. (2019). When urban environments meet pedestrian’s thoughts: Implications for pedestrian affect. Mobilities, 14(5), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1613025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. (2019). Urban ethics in the anthropocene The moral dimensions of six emerging conditions in contemporary urbanism (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, K., Smith, A., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1-2), 95–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credit, K., & Mack, E. (2019). Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 264–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317710466
   Google Scholar
• D’Acci, L. (2019). Orientational versus aesthetical urban street morphology parameterization in space syntax. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 19(3), 172–189.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2018.1564754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016a. Real GDP per capita. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab = table&plugin=1&language = en&pcode = sdg_08_10 (accessed 26 March 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016b. Regional gross domestic product (PPS per inhabitant) by NUTS 2 regions. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tgs00005&plugin=1 (accessed 27 March 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., Connors, M., Goates, J., Hajrasouliha, A., Neckerman, K., Nelson, A., & Green, W. 2013. Validating urban design measures. In TRB 92nd annual meeting compendium of papers, proceedings of the transportation research board 92nd annual meeting, Washington, DC, January 13–17, 2013; 13-1662
   Google Scholar
• Ferdman, A. (2019). Walking and its contribution to objective well-being. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X19875195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Sallis, J., Conway, T., Chapman, J., Saelens, B., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garau, C., & Annunziata, A. (2019). Smart city governance and childrens' agency: An assessment of the green infrastructure impact on children’s activities in Cagliari (Italy) with the tool “opportunities for children in urban spaces (OCUS)”. Sustainability, 11(18), 4848.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garau, C., Annunziata, A., & Coni, M. (2018). A methodological framework for assessing practicability of the urban space: The survey on conditions of practicable environments (SCOPE) procedure applied in the case study of Cagliari (Italy). Sustainability, 10(11), 4189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garau, C., & Pavan, V. (2018). Evaluating urban quality: Indicators and assessment tools for smart sustainable cities. Sustainability, 10(3), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island Press. ISBN 9781597265737.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.2307/429816
   Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., Timperio, A., Bull, F., & Pikora, T. (2005). Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: Increased specificity for ecological models. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 33(4), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200510000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillette, H. (2010). Civitas by design: Building beter communities, from the Garden city to the New Urbanism. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giusti, M., Svane, U., Raymond, C., & Beery, T. (2018). A framework to assess where and how children connect to nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2283. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children's environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children's Environments Quarterly, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., Hanson, J., & Graham, H. (1987). Ideas are in things: An application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14(4), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1068/b140363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. (1999). Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 4(3/4), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1999.19
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. (2012). The genetic codes for cities: Is it simpler than we think? In J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, & E. Tan (Eds.), Complexity theories of cities have come of age. An overview with implications to urban planning and design (pp. 129–152). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., & Iida, S. 2005. Network effects and psychological effects: A theory of urban movement. 5th International space syntax symposium, proceedings, pp. 553–564
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). : Natural movement: Or configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., & Sahbaz, O. (2011). Safety in numbers: High-resolution analysis of crime in street networks. In V. Ceccato (Ed.), The urban fabric of crime and fear (pp. 111–137). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., Yang, T., & Turner, A. (2012). Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap and how it opens nw perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. Journal of Space Syntax, 3(2), 155–193.
   Google Scholar
• Il sole 24 Ore. 2016. La mappa dei redditi nelle città. http://lab24.ilsole24ore.com/mappaRedditi/index.html (Accessed 27 March 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Istat. 2019. Popolazione residente per età, sesso e stato civile al 1° Gennaio 2018. http://demo.istat.it/pop2018/index4.html (Accessed 26 March 2019 )
   Google Scholar
• Jabbari, M., Fonseca, F., & Ramos, R. (2018). Combining multi-criteria and space syntax analysis to assess a pedestrian net-work: The case of Oporto. Journal of Urban Design, 23(1), 23–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1343087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House. ISBN 978-067964433-0.
   Google Scholar
• Jamme, H., Bahl, D., & Banerjee, T. (2018). Between “broken windows” and the “eyes on the street:” Walking to school in inner city San Diego. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel, M. (2013). Encouraging walkability in GCC cities: Smart urban solutions. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(3), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-03-2013-0015
   Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M. (2002). Affordances of children’s environments in the context of cities, small towns, suburbs and rural villages in Finland and Belarus. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., Oliver, M., Ikeda, E., Ahmadi, E., Omiya, I., & Laatikainen, T. (2018). Children as urbanites: Mapping the affordances and behavior settings of urban environments for Finnish and Japanese children. Children's Geographies, 16(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1453923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, E., Coffee, N., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., & Hugo, G. (2007). Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. Health & Place, 13(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2011). Safe on the move: The importance of the built environment. In V. Ceccato (Ed.), The urban fabric of crime and fear (pp. 85–110). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1964). The Image of the city, 2nd ed. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262620017.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafavi, M. (2017). Agnostic urbanism. In M. Mostafavi (Ed.), Ethics of the urban: The city and the spaces of the political (pp. 9–16). Lars Muller.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, F., Cambra, P., & Gonçalves, A. (2017). Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2001). Women and human development: The capabilities approach (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press. ISBN-13 978-0-521-00385-8.
   Google Scholar
• Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Knuiman, M., Jamrozik, K., & Donovan, R. (2000). Survey of the physical envi-ronment in local neighbourhoods SPACES instrument: Observers manual. The University of Western Australia. https://activelivingresearch.org/sites/default/files/ SPACES_Observation_Manual.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2018)
   Google Scholar
• Pyyry, N. (2017). Thinking with broken glass: Making pedagogical spaces of enchantment in the city. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1391–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1325448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, M. (2017). The geometry of urban layouts. A global comparative study. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C., Giusti, M., & Barthel, S. (2018). An embodied perspective on the co-production of cultural ecosystem services: Toward embodied ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(5-6), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1312300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D., Ding, D., Sallis, J., Kerr, J., Norman, G., Durant, N., Harris, S., & Saelens, B. (2009). Neighborhood environment walkability scale for youth (NEWS-Y): Reliability and relationship with physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 49(2-3), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saelens, B., Frank, L., Auffrey, C., Whitaker, R., Burdette, H., & Colabianchi, N. (2006). Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds: EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S190–S207. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saelens, B., & Handy, S. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7 Suppl), S550. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi, B. (2013). La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Gius. Laterza & Figli Spa. ISBN 978 885810841 3.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum, & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Su, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., & Weng, M. (2019). Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2018). Space syntax: A method to measure urban space related to social, economic and cognitive factors. In C. Yamu, A. Poplin, O. Devisch, & G. De Roo (Eds.), The virtual and the real in planning and urban design (pp. 136–150). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2020). Introduction to space syntax in urban studies. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L. (2007). The spatial syntax of urban segregation. The Spatial Syntax of Urban Segregation, 67(3), 205–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and contradiction in architecture (Vol. 1). The Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, I., & Taegen, J. (2019). Access to services in rural areas from the point of view of older population—A case study in Finland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Yang, Y. (2019). Neighbourhood walkability: A review and bibliometric analysis. Cities, 93, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witten, K., Kearns, R., Carroll, P., & Asiasiga, L. (2019). Childrens' everyday encounters and affective relations with place: Experiences of hyperdiversity in Auckland neighbourhoods. Social & Cultural Geography, 20(9), 1233–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1347700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, M., Yu, C., Lee, C., & Frank, L. (2018). Single-family housing value resilience of walkable versus unwalkable neighborhoods during a market downturn: Causal evidence and policy implications. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(8), 1714–1722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118768765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamu, C. (2014). It is simply complex(ity). Modeling and simulation in the light of decision-making, Emergent structures and a world of non-linearity. disP – The Planning Review, 50(4), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2014.1007662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar