Regional design ateliers on ‘energy and space’: systemic transition arenas in energy transition processes

References

• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Re-Examined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 125: 254–259.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., and A. Balducci. 2013. “Practicing Strategic Spatial Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans.” DISP 49 (3): 16–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón, C., J. Buxton, and E. Hamin Infield. 2019. “The Role of Landscape Installations in Climate Change Communication.” Landscape and Urban Planning 189: 11–14. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, P. 2008. Design Charrettes for Sustainable Communities. Washington: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, J., and C. Zuidema. 2015. “Towards and Integrated Energy Landscape.” Urban Planning and Design, doi:10.1680/udap.14.00041.
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, J. 2009. “Landscape Architecture Between Politics and Science: An Integrative Perspective on Landscape Planning and Design in the Network Society.” Dissertation. Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• De Zwart, B. 2015. “Republiek van Beelden, De Politieke Werkingen van het Ontwerp in de Regionale Planvorming.” PhD thesis. TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2005. Technological Transitions and Systems Innovations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., S. Marvin, and H. Bulkeley. 2013. “The Intermediary Organisation of Low Carbon Cities: A Comparative Analysis of Transitions in Greater London and Greater Manchester.” Urban Studies 50 (7): 1403–1422. doi: 10.1177/0042098013480967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. 1995. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Cambridge: Helix Books/Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz, G., M. Brugnach, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2008. “Specifying ‘Regime’ – a Framework for Defining and Describing Regimes in Transition Research.” Technical Forecasting and Social Change 17 (5): 623–643. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.02.010
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., J. Wittmayer, and D. Loorbach. 2018. “Transition Versus Transformation: What’s the Difference?” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27: 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., J. Lukkarinen, P. Kivimaa, R. Lovio, A. Temmes, M. Hildén, T. Martilla, et al. 2019. “Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for Mid-Range Planning.” Sustainability 11 (3). doi: 10.3390/su11030603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IABR. 2014. IABR – Atelier Brabantstad. Rotterdam: IABR. Accessed April 8, 2019. https://iabr.nl/nl/projectatelier/2014pabrabantstad
   Google Scholar
• Joblonska, B., G. Ruijg, I. Opstelten, and E. Willems. 2010. “Innovative Concepts for Energy Neutral Districts in 2050 (Conference Paper).” EASOP 2010 Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., and D. Loorbach. 2006. “Transition Management: A Reflexive Governance Approach.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by J. P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, and R. Kemp, 103–130. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., D. Loorbach, and J. Rotmans. 2007. “Transition Management as a Model for Managing Processes of Co-Evolution Towards Sustainable Development.” International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14: 1–15. doi: 10.1080/13504500709469709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempenaar, A. 2020. “The Connection Between Regional Designing and Spatial Planning.” In Shaping Regional Futures, edited by V. Lingua and V. Balz, 59–69. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kempenaar, A., and A. van den Brink. 2018. “Regional Designing: A Strategic Design Approach in Landscape Architecture.” Design Studies 54: 80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempenaar, A., J. Westerink, M. van Lierop, M. Brinkhuijsen, and A. van den Brink. 2016. “‘Design Makes You Understand’ – Mapping the Contributions of Designing to Regional Planning and Development.” Landscape and Urban Planning 149: 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, and L. Klerkx. 2019. “Towards a Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systemic Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48: 1062–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijers, T., B. Hocks, R. Wijnakker, E. Frijters, J. Hugtenburg, J. Veul, D. Sijmons, et al. 2018. Klimaat-Energie-Ruimte: Ruimtelijke Verkenning Energie en Klimaat. Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. 2013. “Strategic Planning: A Chance for Spatial Innovation and Creativity.” DISP 49 (3): 28–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennertz, B., and A. Lutzenhiser. 2014. The Charrette Handbook, The Essential Guide to Design-Based Public Involvement. Chicago/Washington: The American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. 2010. “Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework.” Governance 23 (1): 161–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijsmans, N. 2010. Designing for a Region. Amsterdam: Sun.
   Google Scholar
• Nassauer, J. 2012. “Landscape as Medium and Method for Synthesis in Urban Ecological Design.” Landscape and Urban Planning 106 (3): 221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M. 2000. “Regional Design: Recovering a Great Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning Tradition.” Landscape and Urban Planning 47 (3–4): 115–128. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M., and W. Zonneveld. 2018. “The Resurgence of Regional Design.” European Planning Studies 26 (7): 1297–1311. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1464127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudes, D., and S. Stremke. 2018. “Spatial Transition Analysis: Spatially Explicit and Evidence-Based Targets for Sustainable Energy Transition at the Local and Regional Scale.” Landscape and Urban Planning 169: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqualetti, M., and S. Stremke. 2018. “Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World: A First Typology of Origins and Expressions.” Energy Research and Social Science 36 (2): 94–105. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.030
   Google Scholar
• Puerari, E., J. De Koning, I. Mulder, and D. Loorbach. 2017. “Shaping Spaces of Interaction for Sustainable Transitions.” Proceedings of AESOP Annual Congress 2017 (pp. 202–208). Lisbon, July 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid, I., and V. Unie van Waterschappen. 2018. Handreiking RES. Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J. 2006. Social Innovation: Between Dream and Reality Lies Complexity. Rotterdam: RSM Erasmus University.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution Than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight 3 (1): 15–31. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., and D. Loorbach. 2009. “Complexity and Transition Management.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 13 (2): 184–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SER. 2018. Ontwerp Klimaatakkoord. Den Haag: SER.
   Google Scholar
• Sijmons, D., E. Frijters, R. Wijnakker, J. Hugtenburg, S. Stremke, B. Hocks, M. Vermeulen, and P. Gerretsen. 2017. Energy & Ruimte – een nationaal perspectief. Rotterdam: Vereniging Deltametropool.
   Google Scholar
• Stremke, S., and S. Schöbel. 2019. “Research Through Design for Energy Transition: Two Case Studies in Germany and the Netherlands.” Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 8 (1): 16–33. doi: 10.1108/SASBE-02-2018-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., J. Edelenbos, A. van den Brink, S. Verweij, R. van Etteger, and T. Busscher. 2019. “To Draw or to Cross the Line? The Landscape Architect as Boundary Spanner in Dutch River Management.” Landscape and Urban Planning 186: 13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lente, H., M. Hekkert, R. Smits, and B. van Waveren. 2003. “Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes.” International Journal of Innovation Management 7 (3): 1–33. doi: 10.1142/S1363919603000817
   Google Scholar