Spatial conditions for car dependency in mid-sized European city regions

References

• Bagley, M., and P. Mokhtarian. 2001. “The Impact of Residential Neighbourhood Type on Travel Behaviour: A Structural Equations Modelling Approach.” The Annals of Regional Science 36 (2002): 279–297. doi:10.1007/s001680200083.
   Google Scholar
• Baptista, P., S. Melo, and C. Rolim. 2014. “Energy, Environmental and Mobility Impacts of Car- Sharing Systems. Empirical Results from Lisbon, Portugal.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 111: 28–37. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.035.
   Google Scholar
• Bento, A., M. Cropper, A. Mobarak, and K. Vinha. 2005. “The Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (3): 466–478. doi:10.1162/0034653054638292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS Statline regionale kerncijfers. 2018. fromstatweb Banen van werknemers; afstand woon-werk (2006–2014). https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/81251NED/table?
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., A. Golub, and B. Nec. 2006. San Francisco City Car Share, Longer Term Travel Demand and Car-Ownership Impacts. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Debrezion, G., E. Pels, and P. Rietveld. 2007. “The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 35 (2): 161–180. doi:10.1007/s11146-007-9032-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPOMM. http://www.epomm.eu/tems/result_city.phtml?city=74.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/cities/data/database.
   Google Scholar
• Geurs, K., and B. Van Wee. 2006. “Ex-post Evaluation of Thirty Years of Compact Urban Development in the Netherlands.” Urban Studies 43 (1): 139–160. doi:10.1080/00420980500409318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giffinger, R., and E. Meyers. 2007. City Ranking of European mid-Sized Cities. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Girardet, H. 2004. Cities People Planet. Chichester: Wiley Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Givoni, M., J. Macmillen, D. Banister, and E. Feitelson. 2013. “From Policy Measures to Policy Packages.” Transport Reviews 33 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/01441647.2012.744779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Maps. https://www.google.nl maps.
   Google Scholar
• Goudappel Coffeng. 2015. Bereikbaarheidsstudie Zuid-Limburg. Maastricht: Regio Zuid-Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. 1993. “A Cycle of Dependence: Automobiles, Accessibility, and the Evolution of the Transportation and Retail Hierarchies.” Berkeley Journal 8: 21–43. doi:10.5070/BP38113081.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. 2017. “Thoughts on the Meaning of Mark Stevens’s Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association 83 (1): 26–28. doi:10.1080/01944363.2016.1246379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms, S. 2003. “From Routine Choice to Rational Decision Making Between Mobility Alternatives.” Conference paper STRC 2003, Swiss Transport Research Conference 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, L., Kansen M., and Jorritsma P. 2015. Verduurzaming sociaal recreatieve Mobiliteit. Den Haag: KiM (Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid).
   Google Scholar
• Inkar. 2013. https://www.inkar.de.
   Google Scholar
• Jeekel, H. 2013. The Car-dependent Society. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kager, R., L. Bertolini, and M. te Brömmelstroet. 2016. “Characterisation of and Reflections on the Synergy of Bicycles and Public Transport.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 85: 208–219. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, J. 2018. “Three Signs Autonomous Vehicles Will Not Lead to Less Car Ownership and Less Car Use in Car Dependent Cities – A Case Study of Sydney.” Australia Planning Theory & Practice, 19 (5): 753–778. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1537599.
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, J., and F. Laube. 1999. “Patterns of Automobile Dependence in Cities: An International Overview of key Physical and Economic Dimensions with Some Implications for Urban Policy.” Transportation Research Part A 33: 691–723.
   Google Scholar
• KiM. 2018. Busgebruikers door dik en dun. Den Haag: Ministerie van knfrastructuur en Waterstaat.
   Google Scholar
• KPPV Dashboard. 2012. Duurzame en slimme mobiliteit. E-bike kan fietsverkeer met meer dan 20% doen toenemen. (http://kpvvdashboard-6blogspot.nl).
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. 2020. Autonomous Vehicle Implementation Predictions Implications for Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtarian, P., I. Salomon, and M. Singer. 2015. “What Moves Us? An Interdisciplinary Exploration of Reasons for Traveling.” Transport Reviews 35 (3): 1–25. doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1013076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 1999. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependency. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. 2006. “Urban Design to Reduce Automobile Dependence.” Opolis: An International Journal of Suburban and Metropolitan Studies 2 (1). Article 3. http://repositories.cdlib.org/cssd/opolis/vol2/iss1/art3.
   Google Scholar
• NOMIS. WP101EW –Population (Workplace population). https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/query/construct/submit.asp?menuopt=201&subcomp=#
   Google Scholar
• NTS UK. 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-travel-survey-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, M., Tim Brown, A. Fernandez-Maldonado, and Lei Qu. 2009. Review of European Planning Systems. Leicester: Centre for Comparative Housing Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rijkswaterstaat (RWS). Nationaal verkeersmodel Ritjeweg. https://ritjeweg.nl/kosten-auto-huren-of-kopen/.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. 1997. Cities for a Small Planet. London: Faber &Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap N., Harms, L., Kansen, M. 2015. Fietsen en lopen: de smeerolie van onze mobiliteit. Den Haag: Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid.
   Google Scholar
• Schakenbos, R., L. La Paix Puello, S. Nijenstein, and K. Geurs. 2015. “Valuation of a Transfer in a Multimodal Public,” Master thesis R. Schakenbos TU Twenthe.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C., and P. Pinho. 2010. “The Structural Accessibility Layer (SAL): Revealing How Urban Structure Constrains Travel Choice.” Environment and Planning A 2010 Volume 42: 2735–2752. doi:10.1068/a42477.
   Google Scholar
• Städteregion Aachen. 2013. Mobilität 2013, Zahlen und Daten. Aachen: Stádteregion Aachen.
   Google Scholar
• Staps, E. 2014. Voor- en natransport bij hoogwaardig openbaar vervoer. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Stradling, S. 2007. Determinants of Car Dependence. Edinburgh: Transport Research Institute, Napier University.
   Google Scholar
• Tayal, T., K. Anantuni, and E. Burns. 2001. Measuring Auto Dependence in Metro Phoenix Using GIS. Tempe: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Tordoir, P., A. Poorthuis, and P. Renooy. 2015. De veranderende geografie van Nederland. Amsterdam: Regioplan.
   Google Scholar
• UK Census. 2011. https://www.ons.gov.uk “census” 2011census.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture and Society 21 (4/5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Acker, V., B. Van Wee, and F. Witlox. 2010. “When Transport Geography Meets Social Psychology : Toward a New Conceptual Model of Travel Behaviour.” Transport Reviews 30 (2): 219–240. doi:10.1080/01441640902943453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Coevering, P. 2013. “Mobiliteit en ruimte in de hedendaagse stedelijke regio.” In Mobiliteit en Ruimte, d ewisselwerking tussen mobiliteit en ruimte in de stedelijkeregio, edited by K.Geurs, 50–65. Ede: CROW.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B. 2009a. “Ruimtelijke Inrichting.” In Verkeer en Vervoer in hoofdlijnen, edited by B. Van Wee, and J. A. Annema, 85–106. Bussum: Coutinho.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B. 2009b. “Self-selection: A Key to a Better Understanding of Location Choices, Travel Behaviour, and Transport Externalities?” TransportReviews 29 (3): 279–292. doi:10.1080/01441640902752961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., W. Bohte, E. Molin, T. Arentze, and F. Liao. 2014. “Policies for Synchronization in the Transport–Land-use System.” Transport Policy 31: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wee, B., and K. Maat. 2003. Land-Use and Transport: A Review and Discussion of Dutch Research. Delft: Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management Delft University of Technology Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M., and F. Furst. 1999. Land Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art. Dortmund: IRPUD.
   Google Scholar
• Wiersma, J. 2020. “Commuting Patterns and car Dependency in Urban Regions.” Journal of Transport Geography 84: 102700. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersma, J., L. Bertolini, and T. Straatemeier. 2016. “How Does the Spatial Context Shape Conditions for car Dependency?” Journal of Transport and Land Use 9 (3): 35–55. doi:10.5198/jtlu.2015.583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersma, J., L. Bertolini, and T. Straatemeier. 2017. “Adapting Spatial Conditions to Reduce car Dependency in mid-Sized ‘Post Growth’ European City Regions: The Case of South Limburg, Netherlands.” Transport Policy 55: 62–69. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar